The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. As long as each Miss USA winner has an article then in order to avoid Systemic bias I can see no reason why each winner of Most Beautiful Girl in Nigeria shouldn't have an article also. I'm sure they garner much media attention in Nigeria, though it may not be as easily availiable as its US counterpart. (non-admin close) RMHED (talk) 20:02, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ann Suinner

[edit]

AfDs for this article:

Articles for deletion/Ann Suinner

This is a string of articles about individuals whose sole claim to notability is having won a beauty pageant--not a valid reason in my opinion. Inclusion seems inconsistent with numerous guidelines including notability (entertainers), people notable only for one event, and what Wikipedia is not. Would like community views on this. Bongomatic (talk) 10:18, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep - As much as I dislike 'beauty' pageants, the Most Beautiful Girl in Nigeria (MBGN) is a national competition and fairly high profile. Also, I found a reliable source about her [1]. Black-Velvet 10:36, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Falls under Wikipedia:WikiProject Beauty Pageants.--Paul McDonald (talk) 12:38, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The notability criteria of Wikiprojects are not Wikipedia guidelines. All of the nominees must meet the WP:BIO notability standard. --brew crewer (yada, yada) 15:06, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:29, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:29, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment We can always hope that consensus will change on things like this. I doubt it has, but I personally wouldn't oppose the change. DGG (talk) 08:33, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.