The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete - clearly fails WP:BIO. - KrakatoaKatie 11:12, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alfreda Williams (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Vanity article with no independent sources to indicate that this local politician is in any way notable. Cap'n Walker 16:00, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Keep Keep: But clean up. It took me a couple of seconds to find a NYT article on the woman. Granted this is written as an autobiography, but it appears that she's notable. I'll add the NYT article as a citation. Toddstreat1 16:05, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. If you are referring to the article about public computer records, I saw it. The article is about the debated practice of municipalties placing what may be sensitive information online. She is cited as an example of a town clerk engaged in this debate. I don't think that makes her notable. The only other articles I see about her make mention of her in passing. Cap'n Walker 16:15, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, significnatly short of WP:BIO. --Dhartung | Talk 21:57, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.