Welcome, Spworld2!

Hello, Spworld2, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages that you might find helpful. If you need interactive assistance please visit The Help desk. You may want to begin by reading these pages: Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page How to write a great article Simplified Manual of Style Your first article I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions. Again, welcome! Sincerely, - SUN EYE 1 18:02, 9 September 2022 (UTC)  Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tanur Assembly constituency, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tanur. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 16 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Spworld2,

Do not casually move around pages on this project with no explanation. Doing so can result in a loss of editing privileges. You need to have a good reason to move a page, leave an explanatory edit summary and not move a page around multiple times. You should adopt best practices and also leave an edit summary with each edit.

If you have questions about page moving or editing on this project, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:29, 9 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shihab Thangal Charity Trust is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shihab Thangal Charity Trust until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Thilsebatti (talk) 05:13, 9 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Shihab Thangal Charity Trust. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Thilsebatti (talk) 04:51, 18 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Spworld2! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of 2023 Kerala bombing several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:2023 Kerala bombing, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you.  — Amakuru (talk) 08:55, 30 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Education in Malappuram, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 05:51, 29 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited International protests over the 2023 Israel–Palestine crisis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Columbus.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 29 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rajeev Chandrasekhar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cyber police.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 5 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Nava Kerala Sadas. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources, it has too many problems of language or grammar and In addition it appears to not meet notability requirements (see WP:NOTNEWS and needs rewritten from a neutral point of view (see WP:NPOV).. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

When finished making improvements, please use the Submit button to send the article to AfC (Articles for Creation).

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back.  // Timothy :: talk  09:38, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Nava Kerala Sadas. Thanks! Thilsebatti (talk) 03:56, 19 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick(Talk) 12:49, 26 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! I'm Thilsebatti. Your recent edit(s) to the page Amala Shaji appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Thilsebatti (talk) 08:45, 25 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Noted, User:Spworld2 4:58, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to List of most-viewed Instagram reels. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is unclear if any source establishes these as the absolute Top 5, one of the sources just discussed "some of the most-viewed" [1] rather than absolute Top 5. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. MarioGom (talk) 10:13, 8 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

noted , This list includes name and video of most viewed Instagram Reels with its reference along with its direct video link. This reduces the possibility of changing it to draft and wants to change it in the main space Like YouTube Video Lists and Instagram Post Likes and Followers List currently Article Available category includes this, which is going to move to main space Spworld2 10:30, 8 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of most-viewed Instagram reels is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of most-viewed Instagram reels until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

MarioGom (talk) 13:57, 8 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

After deletion of the "meme trolls in Kerala" thing, there appears to be at least two-editor support Freiland and me) for adding a section called something like "Social media" at Politics of Kerala that uses the better-quality ones of the sources you provided at AfD, to concisely and narrowly focus on use of social media (including but not overly dwelling on memes and trolling) by politicians and their supporters in Kerala. If you try to WP:COATRACK it into a "memes in Kerala are magically special" or "there's a unique trolling community in Kerala" story, you can expect it to be reverted. But if it sticks to just reporting the salient facts without elaboration and original research that paints and exaggeratory picture, then it would probably be useful. Some stuff to focus on: Kerala being somewhat behind-the-times until recently in this department, then over a fairly short span becoming very social-media active, especially in regards to citizen activism, and politicians themselves and their boosters using the Internet for campaigning, in lieu of street-corner rallies and paper leaflets. Plus two instances of governmental crack-down on socio-political trollers. That sort of stuff. Keep it on-topic and it will work well.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  00:59, 11 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I don't see article creation as a warning sound, I think Wikipedia can be a source for the world to know the truth about social media special in Kerala. I would like to include a part Kerala Social Media Politics in "Politics in Kerala" which has a clear source in this world, Hope more wikipedia professors like you to follow and post mortem on the slightest doubt, thank you for your great well wish. --Owner of magical cat 🐈 (talk) 11:47, 11 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Muhammad Riswan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammad Riswan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Thilsebatti (talk) 03:55, 11 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Noted, Thank you --Owner of magical cat 🐈 11:51, 11 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amala Shaji is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amala Shaji until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Thilsebatti (talk) 08:42, 25 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Noted, User:Spworld2 8:43, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Salva Marjan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salva Marjan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

H4MCHTR (talk) 08:55, 8 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Spworld2. Thank you for your work on Lotus Lake Wetland Thirunavaya Malappuram. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|SunDawn)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:59, 18 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The redirect Majlis Al-Noor has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 25 § Majlis Al-Noor until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 02:56, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for message.

If you have a conflict of interest, you must declare it. Please don't write about yourself, your friends or relatives and read the guidance below:

• When you write about a person, you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that they meet the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the person or an associated organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the person claims or interviewing them. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls.

• A fair bit of the text was unreferenced, and your bare url refs included obviously unacceptable sources such as the Daily Mail, YouTube and Yahoo News, and pages that were interviews with her or press releases rather than independent third-party sources.

• You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.

• You refer to her throughout by her first name, and the text is basically a fan-page with claims like Robert was immediately drawn to Maleesha because of her tales, stellar academic record, and potential as a model and dancer... The posts got a lot of positive feedback from the viewers, who praised her for her attractiveness.... and has captured the hearts of people all around the world...Notable...

• There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
• You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

• I didn't check.

Not reasons for deletion, but you shouldn't use bare url refs, and you should have headings in sentence case, not the current inconsistent style,

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. If you are writing about yourself, or someone you know as a friend, colleague, client, employer or relative, you have a conflict of interest, and you must disclose the nature of that COI.

Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:05, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]