This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Hello Sam Sailor: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, North America1000 15:30, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
Spread the WikiLove; use ((subst:Season's Greetings1)) to send this message
Thank you very much in advance, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Parauleira (talk • contribs) 16:18, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi Parauleira. I'll be happy to help, if I can. Could you pick the two or three sources that talk most about him and list them here, please? — SamSailor 23:46, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
Dear Sam Sailor, thank you very much!! Here I will list some of the references I provided on the page:
[1][2][3][4][5]
Those are some references in English. I am collecting more in this moment. Thank you very much Parauleira (talk) 06:43, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
@Parauleira: I've had a look at all references currently found in Ramzi Maqdisi. The overall guideline we follow is the General notability guideline with its mantra "a topic is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." That is not yet the case for Maqdisi, at least with the current sourcing: his participation as an actor in The Attack, Omar, and Love, Theft and Other Entanglements is in minor roles, and the films he has directed/photographed are short films without substantial coverage in sources. Thus the specific notability guidelines WP:NACTOR and WP:FILMMAKER are not met either. I'm sorry I can't help salvaging this article; maybe you can find some comfort in reading the essay Wikipedia:Too soon. — SamSailor 10:50, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
Wikidata weekly summary #240
Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.
Basque language Wikipedia develops a most prominent basque and worlwide person born/death in this day for all the day related articles. For example, eu:Abenduaren 19. It also displays interesting red links for people born and dead that day that are not represented in eu:wp.
Merry Christmas, Sam Sailor! Or Season's Greetings or Happy Winter Solstice! As the year winds to a close, I would like to take a moment to recognize your hard work and offer heartfelt gratitude for all you do for Wikipedia. And for all the help you've thrown my way over the years. May this Holiday Season bring you nothing but joy, health and prosperity. Onel5969TT me 23:49, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for your very kind greetings, onel5969, and have my best wishes in return. — SamSailor 11:30, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for your friendly wishes, David, but we need not compare contribs to know that it is I how should be thanking you, and be thanking you for the esprit with which you argue, edit, and guide in these waters. I hope you have had some good Wiki-free days yourself, and in the likely event that my habitual laziness prevents me from posting you a proper New Year card on your talk page, would you here please have my best wishes for your good health in the year ahead. Best, — SamSailor 02:00, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
Happy Holidays
Hello Sam Sailor: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Samsara 15:56, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
Spread the WikiLove; use ((subst:Season's Greetings1)) to send this message
Best wishes to you and yours! Samsara 15:56, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
Why, thank you Samsara, and would you please have my sincere hope that you and yours enjoyed and are enjoying some happy days filled with contentment and joy. And thank you for all you have been doing for this project for more than 13 years. May we have the benefit of your 14th just ahead of us. Best, — SamSailor 02:00, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for your kind words, Sam. I'll keep doing my best. May you also continue your good work here for many years to come - you seem to be a great force for good on the project. Best, Samsara 04:06, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
Merry, merry!
From the icy Canajian north; to you and yours! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 15:00, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
Thank you so much for your wishes, Bill, and I hope you had happy holidays yourself and are enjoying a relaxing boxing week. Among the many people in arts and music we had to part with this year, it made me sad that your countryman Leonard Cohen was one of them. But what a life he had, and what an impact he made. In his 2010 acceptance speech for the Grammy Lifetime Achievement Award he quoted his song Tower of Song: "But you'll be hearing from me baby, long after I'm gone" and I am sure those words will be proven right. Bill, may you have a safe a sound new year. Best, — SamSailor 02:00, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
Sam Sailor, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
–Davey2010Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 13:43, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for the wishes! Maybe we will have the opportunity to work more together this year ;) Best, Cartoon network freak (talk) 22:01, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Belatedly...apologies for that, thank you for your good wishes and all the best to you for 2017. May your sailing (editing) be plain and not beset by fake Italian families or IP-hopping F1 editors! Eagleash (talk) 13:12, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi Sam_Sailor, it was stupid closing it. Too quick I think on my part to speedy keep. Total waste of time. Personally I think it is now well forward of the WP:NBASKETBALL standard. I can't see profit in doing it it again. But at the same time, there is value is seeing it being done by consensus in motion, not backdoor deals as it is at the moment. Reopen? scope_creep (talk) 00:18, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Italy report: Libraries of 1602 and 2016, science museum new home for wikimedians
Netherlands report: Image donation Specilla circularia; Glass negatives by photographer Jan Goedeljee; Pattypan training for GLAMs; 1500 historical images from the Peace Palace Library
And your objection is? — SamSailor 03:57, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
You're not an admin and you closed the discussion after a single day. While I understand IAR is a policy, I don't think it makes the encyclopedia better to end discussion preemptively on the belief that you're cutting down a backlog. Normally I would just shrug off this sort of behavior but I'm told then unless editors complain about bad AfD closes then everyone assumes it was fine. So, I'm making an issue of this. Chris Troutman (talk) 04:04, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
What I seem to hear is the argument you're not an admin and you closed the discussion after a single day, [therefore it is a] bad AfD close. I had hoped for something PAG based, but I do remember the non-policy based deletion argument made in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wolf of Soissons with the unusual statement that "As for me, sources I can neither evaluate nor use are not sources at all, to my mind.", and your subsequent post on my talk page.
Having passed by Porta Maggiore daily during a year of studying in Rome in the late 1980s and being familiar with the topic of Aqua Anio Novus does not exactly diminish my surprise over seeing that someone would nominate Aqua Anio Novus for deletion. The nomination, short of complying with WP:AFDHOWTO, with the WP:ASSERTN argument "No importance" as nominator's only edit here, demonstrates a lack of knowledge of subject that perhaps makes a speedy keep under WP:SK#3 possible, a criterion explicitly mentioned as appropriate in WP:NADC, but here I chose a WP:SCLOSE under WP:SNOW, as four editors opined for "keep".
I don't see any other outcome than "keep" or maybe "speedy keep" possible regardless of who closes that discussion and when they close it, e.g. the idea you mentioned in a comment that the article could be userfied to your user space so you "could rewrite ... and get a DYK out of it" is in my opinion unlikely to gain traction or be a good argument at DRV, cf. WP:DRVPURPOSE. Regards, — SamSailor 15:07, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
You're not wrong in your assessment. I acknowledged in my own AfD comment that I saw a consensus for keep forming. However, I think IAR shouldn't be an essay, let alone a policy. (That's not a policy-based argument of mine, at all.) While you might see utility in closing a discussion that looks like a foregone conclusion, I see a case-by-case slapdash disregard of the rules, which is offensive to me. Had the discussion went the full seven days and closed as it had I'd live with it. Had you been an elected-for-life admin and closed it early I'd recognize I'd have to get you desysopped for a pattern of misconduct since deletion review wouldn't end in my favor. I'm a very selfish editor and I'm not going to improve that article unless I can get something out of it and it'll continue to be an eyesore for years to come. In the past I'd've ignored these missed opportunities but now that we have editors who require complaints in order to admit there was a problem I'm forced to voice my opinion lest someone believe I was ok with it. Thanks anyway, for your response. I'm more concerned with the abuse of IAR than I am with the apparent consensus. Chris Troutman (talk) 16:02, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Attended the Wikimedia Developer Summit to talk about a lot of things (including editing Wikidata from Wikipedia directly, back-end work for structured data support for Commons - specifically Multi Content Revisions, ideas for improvements to the query service)
Final touches to get ArticlePlaceholder pages ready for search engine indexing
Continued working on "federation" – support for multiple Wikibase repositories (phab:T76007)
Clickable prototype for client editing is finally in the works!
Hello, Sam Sailor. Please check your email; you've got mail! It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((You've got mail)) or ((ygm)) template.
Hi, I'm Sjö. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Urban developers, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Sjö (talk) 08:27, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
Hejsan Sjö, hur är läget? It's fine marking that page as "unreviewed", the speedy tag marked it as patrolled. (We, the community, possibly need to clarify the use of the terms "review" and "patrol" in respect to NPP and the new user group.) I'll be taking the page to AfD a little later. — SamSailor 16:45, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
Coordinates on Russian Wikipedia now link to maps generated with the Kartographer extension. The map includes the location outline, if that object exists in OpenStreetMap (OSM) with a corresponding Wikidata ID (ways and relations only, not nodes). Example: w:ru:Зальцбург (click coordinates in the upper right corner, or in the infobox on the side). If you create a Wikidata item about a specific administrative area, building, or other physical individual object which appears on maps, then please add the Wikidata ID to the relevant object in OSM, using key:wikidata= (here's how to contribute to OSM).
QuickStatements V2 can now run your commands in the background, no need to keep the browser tab open anymore
Hi Sam, I was looking through potential admin candidates and your name came up. You seem to have a good mix of content and administrative work, particularly in AfD and CSD, and you might finds the tools useful. Would you be interested in going for RfA at any time? Ritchie333(talk)(cont) 10:34, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi Ritchie, and thank you for the confidence you place in me. I see that we share an interest in AfD, and while I haven't lifted any article to the pinnacles of GA, I did detect opportunities to rescued a few from their particular predicaments or lack of tender care. I've been blessed with permission to use some of our unbundled tools, and there is no shortage of tasks to perform with those. Should that get monotonous, there's always CAT:ALS with its 200k+ backlog waiting, a sisyphean task handled by the rarely mentioned WP:URA, but at the same time it is a task that invites one to learn about new subjects, places, and people. So, to answer your question, yes, I'd be happy to serve, but I don't regard adminship as a goal, as something to strive for, I don't think my "Wikilife" would be more fulfilling by having the extra bits in the toolbox, and I doubt I'll be running anytime soon. Because, among the many various virtues and achievements we may want to see in an admin candidate, I think a reasonably consistency in participation is wanted, and mine has been less than stellar since September where real life matters made me try to stay offline in general. But let's stay in touch and reevaluate in say six or 12 months from now. I'm in no hurry. Again, thank you; I'm honored. Best regards, — SamSailor 03:19, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi, Sam Sailor. Upon my return today after being away, I see that there has been probable socking at those AFDs. So I have filed an SPI case here requesting a check-user. Just wanted to let you know. Thanks for keeping an eye on the discussions. Cheers. — CactusWriter (talk) 17:15, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi CactusWriter, thanks for letting me know. I think "probable" is a very kind way to put it. I might be wrong and I assume you know best, but I can recall that CU requests linking IPs with named accounts being turned down at SPI. But the behavioral evidence should be enough for blocking. — SamSailor 17:24, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Whoops. You're correct. I forgot about that. I'll see about their opinion behavior. — CactusWriter (talk) 18:40, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
An evening cuppa and my IKEA sofa have temporarily incapacitated me. I'll be happy to dig up the diffs and file at SPI, if you have better things to do. Let me know. — SamSailor 18:48, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
And if it isn't, we'll likely not hear a word from them as soon as thoseAfDs are closed discounting non-policy based !votes. — SamSailor 19:06, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Wikidata weekly summary #242
Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.
This week, most of the developers are at the Dev Summit hacking stuff and doing great things!
Continued working on "federation" – support for multiple Wikibase repositories (phab:T76007)
New dimensions for unit conversion in the query service (phab:T150881)
Fixed a timing issue that can happen when using the property suggester (phab:T115267)
Still investigating an issue in which the "save" button stays disabled, as reported in December
We may remove the sliding animation when using the date, geo, monolingual, and quantity experts (gerrit:330145). The preview popup may now cover parts of the page. Please try it at wikidata.beta.wmflabs.org and tell us what you think on our contact page.
We now have 808 New Page Reviewers!
Most of us requested the user right at PERM, expressing a wish to be able to do something about the huge backlog, but the chart on the right does not demonstrate any changes to the pre-user-right levels of October.
The backlog is still steadily growing at a rate of 150 a day or 4,650 a month. Only 20 reviews a day by each reviewer over the next few days would bring the backlog down to a managable level and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work!
It didn't work in time to relax for the Xmas/New Year holidays. Let's see if we can achieve our goal before Easter, otherwise by Thanksgiving it will be closer to 70,000.
Second set of eyes
Remember that we are the only guardians of quality of new articles, we alone have to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged by non-Reviewer patrollers and that new authors are not being bitten.
Abuse
This is even more important and extra vigilance is required considering Orangemoody, and
This Reviewer is indefinitely blocked for sockpuppetry.
Coordinator election
Kudpung is stepping down after 6 years as unofficial coordinator of New Page Patrolling/Reviewing. There is enough work for two people and two coords are now required. Details are at NPR Coordinators; nominate someone or nominate yourself. Date for the actual suffrage will be published later.
When posting a link to an item to social networks and on messenger apps that show previews the previews will now be nicer and show an image. (phabricator:T51859)
The Cebuano and Swedish wikis have a lot of bot-created content which is unconnected to other wiki articles. A good way to tackle that problem is by checking constraint violations for property GeoNames ID.
Hi, could you please take a look at the improvements of the Krasniqi article. I have added some new info. Plus international media attention, and media coverage pre-Melodifestivalen. And performance at Debaser a known hiphop/rapper stage in Stockholm. BabbaQ (talk) 00:39, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi BabbaQ. This is really telling for how low we have to reach to find anything. She came six and did not qualify for the next round. Then we have Smålandsposten (ironical, that news paper name) and a short 3:49 radio interview. You have been here plenty long to know that we are nowhere near WP:BASIC. Best, — SamSailor 00:49, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
That is an opinion. I leave it at that :)--BabbaQ (talk) 00:51, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Paul Whelan (rugby player)
Correct the error when orginally writing the page, misinformation, I confused the two players when writing, while yes the current player does exist his current ability does not merit a wikipedia page. Pat Whelan was the subject i originally wrote on however it was maliciously changed. I reccommend leaving it as Pat Whelan the subject it was on first, It resolves the situation quicker. I am going to revert the change as while it holds a AfD tag it does not require discussion or deletion as I have rewritten and corrected the error made through other editors. Please read the paul version and check sources if desired but Pat was my orginal subject.Oreilly90 (talk) 00:54, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Paul Whelan (Rugby Player)
Lads, it was made as a joke for a lad who plays leinster development, he doesnt merit a wikipedia page. He's talented but not that talented for a wikipedia page yet ahaha. I made the page as a joke with the lads so ban me if ye wish, I created the page. It was a good joke initially he is not currently happy with this situation though, apologises for wasting your time. I have ((Db-blanked)) the page please delete and ban me if ye want and dont revert the page just delete it so he stops crying ahaha.Oreilly90 (talk) 00:02, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Paul Whelan
Hi, on behalf of my idiotic teammates I would like too apologise too you and your wasted efforts and on behalf of leinster. I do play with their development teams however i dont deserve a wiki page and only found out recently they made it and didnt get it on merit. if you would like identity verification please feel free to email me. I dislike the majority of comments made against me by people who dont play or follow rugby as it is hurtful and damaging so i hope you will not revert my post. I just want all of this finished and deleted please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PjdW97 (talk • contribs) 17:27, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
@PjdW97: Paul, thanks for your comment, and you are quite right, the guys who did this are bloody idiots. A. it's a good waste of time for us who do try to take Wikipedia serious, and would have delighted in sourcing an article about you, and B. maybe more importantly because such shenanigans may tarnish the name of the person involved. Good luck with rugby and good luck in general. Sincerely, — SamSailor 17:34, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for understanding man, I got dropped from the acd down to the lower team cause the academy is essential 21/22 + and i was playing out of my depth thats when they had a reason to take the biscuit and request deletion and revert and so on. I know who they are OReilly and changerugby alright. They should be banned :). Man, I dont understand how wiki works, how can i just get that page and the artile for deletion removed. I understand ye were helping the resources of wiki but half them comments are unfair, i put it up for deletion best i could. I just want it all gone. Ill have one of these pages one day and by merit not by annoying teammates. Is the page gna be removed at some stage, are users like yourself able too just remove the article for deletion and main page or is there someone i needa message? Thanks again for understanding man.PjdW97 (talk) 17:42, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Paul, I see that NeilN responded to the call for help on your talk page and courtesy blanked the deletion discussion, so we're good? Go and give those teammates a gentle punch in the face for their juvenile transgressions ;) ... and then maybe have a pint and a laugh about it? Anyways, good luck, Paul, if you're ~19 now you're looking forward to a great decade in your life. — SamSailor 18:29, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:47, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:46, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello Sam, Our old FI IP-hopping chum has now been blocked for 'abusing multiple accounts'. There are multiple pages in user space (I.e. [[:User:Rowde/xxxxxx]]) none of which would ever likely to make it to mainspace. Can CSD G5 (blocked user) be applied or does that only come into effect after the block is imposed? (Some could be tagged 'U5' but of course he's made many edits outside of userspace). Thanks. Hope all is well. Regards, Eagleash (talk) 22:39, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
@Eagleash: Yeah, all's well, you're good? The thing about G5 is that it only applies to pages made in violation of a ban or block. Typical scenario: indef blocked or community banned user returns and creates a page that sounds a lot like something they created before the block/ban. An SPI is opened. A CU confirms that it's the same user. ((Db-g5))/((Db-banned)) apply. So, without having had a look-see in their user-space, I guess that MfD is the solution. Is he indef blocked? — SamSailor 22:47, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Yes he's indef. blocked. I thought (after I jumped the gun and tagged one page..I removed it!) that it could only apply once he's been blocked, not retrospectively. U5 should definitely apply to some and one Admin. doesn't seem to worry about edits outside userspace but others do. There's been more deleted via U5 than not though... Do not know how the block came about. Came out of nowhere, no reports filed by those who usually grapple with his edits. Yes all is (relatively) OK at the moment. :P. Thanks for help. Eagleash (talk) 23:02, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
I see nothing when searching for Rowde prefix:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/, and it's not a checkuserblock; you could try ask Favonian about what led to the block. A bundled nomination at MfD is straightforward. — SamSailor 23:32, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
I checked with Favonian, who blocked Rowde after confusing him with another blocked editor, because Rowde left an odd message on Fav's TP at precisely the wrong moment. The block is now WP:NOTHERE and TP access has been restored. In the meantime I have taken one of the userpages (abandoned for 9 months) to MfD but I cannot find instructions on 'bundling' the others. I think I've done it before but I can't remember how. Eagleash (talk) 23:56, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
@Eagleash: Instructions are found at § How to list pages for deletion, but perhaps you should read WP:STALE and consider that he just got blocked and at least theoretically could be unblocked. Would he go to WP:REFUND and get it all back? Waiting a month or two or five with those user space drafts doesn't hurt, does it? — SamSailor 00:09, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
I did consider the time aspect (so to speak) and started with the most obviously pointless page. It's just one line (the title repeated) for something which actually already exists in mainspace, albeit as a redirect. So I think it really needs to go just as housekeeping. He won't recreate it (if unblocked)...he would have continued working on it if he was at all interested in it. He just realised it was a duplication (and that the redirect contains the hidden advice we discussed previously) and left it lying around. You know how little he understands about Wiki...Refund doesn't seem all that likely somehow. I don't intend to take any more to MfD right now myself...can't speak for any others who have been involved though! Eagleash (talk) 00:25, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
I trust you do what's best in the situation. A pity that editor could not be integrated in the project, but I know you and the other F1 editors did try. — SamSailor 00:36, 14 February 2017 (UTC) (P.S. I had been here for more than two years before becoming aware of WP:LISTGAP. Read it and go "oh, my!" I made such blank lines myself, and never gave it a second thought.)
Well, I did invite him to join the project several times but without response...he rarely communicated in any way at all. He created a sockpuppet to 'accept' his own block appeal and now TP access is revoked. Interestingly, he has recently begun editing from a different range which geolocates to Newbury, Berks., UK, so it looks as if his time at the school we discussed previously has come to an end. Some of the content he created about the school (long deleted) indicated he had his problems there too. I don't think I've messed up with blank lines myself...but that's more luck than judgement. Eagleash (talk) 15:16, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
His imperative All Article users must ask my permission to deal with my articles. tells me he isn't fit for a collaborative environment such as ours. Creating a sock to fill in an ((unblock reviewed)), that's just plain stupid, and reinserting it twice with the master account, well, Favonian hits the nail when he replies "You asked for it", there's a limit to the amount of crap we should take here. — And as for blank lines, you inserted one before your indented reply here. I inserted a colon to comply with MOS:INDENTGAP. I'm still only trying to get into good habits in this regard myself. There was an interview with Graham87 in the Signpost in January. Well worth a read. — SamSailor 15:53, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Wikidata weekly summary #247
Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.
Module Wikidata on Wikidata received an update to improve its performance. If your wiki has forked this one, consider updating it and report any problems (already reported one).
Experimental c:Template:Category contains for categories on Commons, including a per-category Wikidata query. See introductory discussion on Commons Village Pump. Presented together with current statistics on Commons category <-> Wikidata links
Doing a trial run of allowing search engines to index a number of ArticlePlaceholder pages on Welsh Wikipedia. If there are no major issues we will enable this for all placeholders.
Improving Federation-related after initial tests,
Getting ready to deploy automated sitelinks for Wiktionary
Hi, I noticed on your recent edit on the TLC discography page that you added a slash symbol at the end of the code for line breaks, i.e. br/. I'm posting this message to let you know that adding a slash at the end of a break does nothing to change its appearance on the page; so in effect, all it does is add unneeded characters to the page. It's the same with the spaces you added in between | and < > symbols. Adding these does nothing to change the display of the page.Nqr9 (talk) 03:13, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Concurrently I ran TMg's script autoFormatter that semi-automatically fixes more than 200 common errors in the wiki markup, one of these fixes is using the syntax <br />. This is a self-closing syntax for the tag, and autoFormatter inserts in the same manner a space in e.g. <ref name=riaa/> so it becomes <ref name=riaa />. You are perfectly correct that adding a space and a slash to <br> so it becomes <br />does nothing to change its appearance on the page, because the element only shows in edit mode, but it became, if I'm not mistaken, an XML requirement back when XHTML was introduced.