|
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to George Conway have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:21, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chris Matthews. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
((Help me))
on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:43, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Slywriter (talk) 04:46, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'm JayBeeEll. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. JBL (talk) 21:38, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. Bishonen | tålk 14:21, 29 November 2021 (UTC).
This is not necessary to have a new header for a 1-paragraph topic in an article such as Steve Bannon. It does not aid the reader in navigating the article - rather, it makes it more fragmented and disjointed. Please stop, before this has to be escalated. Zaathras (talk) 22:09, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'm KyleJoan. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Chris Cuomo seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. KyleJoantalk 13:21, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Please adhere to BLP policy; consider proposing contentious changes first on the talk page. Please do not edit war. Editors who are careless with regard to BLP policy may be blocked or otherwise restricted. Thank you. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 22:11, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~))
. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page.
Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."
If you want to be unblocked, you need to show that you will start responding to warnings here and to use article talk pages - as well as showing that you understand why you were getting the warnings. Doug Weller talk 16:43, 4 December 2021 (UTC)