This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Mathsci, this is really meant as a friendly request – could you please consider just taking a step back at the Arbcom thing? I appreciate you feel exasperated, but with all these repeated posts I'm afraid you are really not doing yourself a favour. Just give it a rest for now. You have made your case understood, but now you are coming across as increasingly aggressive, and that only fuels the whole mess more. Please just try and get some distance from this whole situation. (You're always welcome to give me a note if any new problem emerges, of course.) Fut.Perf. ☼ 13:06, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
I'm always glad to see well edited articles about mathematics on Wikipedia, so I hope you will be able to join that effort as your other activities permit. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit) 22:45, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
Mathsci (UCL HH) 195.194.4.65 (talk) 17:00, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
Mathsci, you have my sincere wishes on a favorable recovery. You are always (and have always been) in my thoughts as a stalwart defender of this noble, but perhaps ultimately foolish, project that we all have so heavily invested ourselves in. I have always looked up to you in this regard, since I very first joined this project, although I have not had much direct interaction with you. I myself am unable to commit myself as stauchly as you to the project. For instance, ArbCom scares the hell out of me. In spite of this I have found myself embroiled in minor skirmishes of my own, some of my own making no doubt, but more just because there was no one else around. One thing I have noticed is that after a period of rest, often those windmills we once fought against tend to dissolve when we do not champion ourselves against them. It is the conflict itself that sustains them. I hope you will take this for what it is: sincere counsel from a much less experienced Wikipedian (as well as a young mathematician). I do consider you a friend, and wish you well. Yours, Sławomir Biały (talk) 00:39, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
Get well soon. Volunteer Marek 01:53, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
Me too. Relax, take a break, best wishes William M. Connolley (talk) 08:20, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
This really isn't going to do you any favors. In general I'd recommend you back off a bit. I'm familiar with some of the folks you're up against and when they can tell they're getting to you, they bore in that much harder. The best response is to be as dull, laconic and bland as you can manage. Short Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 22:33, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
Really, just let it rest a while. I know how patronizing it is when someone says "for your own good" but I'm going to say it anyway. I think you could benefit from a week or so of kicking back, listening to some good tunes, and generally staying the hell away from this goddamn dysfunctional "community" to do whatever makes you happy. Consider or disregard this as you will. Short Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 05:08, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
As long as WMF insists on anyone-can-edit IP editing, we're going have vandals and trolls. You don't deserve to be harassed, obviously, but you just reward the trolling when you comment on closed ANI threads and go sticking Sockpuppet tags on IP accounts. Trolls want recognition and by naming a suspect you just encourage them. NE Ent 13:35, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
... do me a favour and stay off the Amendmend page thread too from now on. You're unlikely to achieve anything good by posting more. The more you say, the more others will feel entitled to say in return, and it will be yet another unstoppable avalanche of mutual recriminations just as we had a few weeks ago. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:35, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
Got some links for those notices or warnings from EdJohnston and MBisanz to SightWatcher you just mentioned over in Arbistan? Fut.Perf. ☼ 18:03, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
See User:Mathsci/Jeremy Dunning-Davies - please let me know when you're finished. Dougweller (talk) 17:37, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
I've closed the SPI request. Regarding those unblocked accounts, if they do cause any trouble feel free to ping me to block them (or ping any other admin, you can use this diff if you need to convince them). --(ʞɿɐʇ) ɐuɐʞsǝp 18:23, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
Seasons greetings to you and yours
Dougweller (talk) 14:16, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
Hey Mathsci, I was just wondering why you reverted my recent readdition of the section of AN/I entitled "Requesting the deletion of an edit summary"? I was under the impression that, especially on high-traffic (relatively speaking) pages such as AN/I, it is always ill-advised to delete content as opposed to allowing it to enter the AN/I archives. Juhachi's request involved non-public information, but this information was not actually included in the post on AN/I. Could you please let me know of your reasoning? Kind regards, — Oli OR Pyfan! 10:24, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
Not acknowledging the Gimmetoo account as being an alternate of Gimmetrow has become a sticking point for Gimmetrow, and the fact that a checkuser was done to link the accounts when he refused to do so has seriously angered him. I got a similar ration on my talkpage when I ran for checkuser: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kww&oldid=455735566#Your_response is chock full of relevant links and discussion.—Kww(talk) 15:49, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we are requesting your participation to help find a resolution. The thread is "Marseille".
Please take a moment to review the simple guide and join the discussion. Thank you! EarwigBot operator / talk 19:31, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
Restored deletion of a posting at WP:FTNHello! It appeared to me that your overwriting another editor’s posting here was accidental—you didn’t mention it in the edit summary—so I restored it. Please feel free to revert if you had good reason for removing the message.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 10:22, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
Note on copyvioYou can't even have copyvio in a sandbox, I've told him that. Also, have you read WP:Close paraphrase? Dougweller (talk) 12:17, 3 January 2013 (UTC) ThanksI appreciate you reporting this. I wasn't sure if we should file SPI reports for IPs and now I know:) Hope you are returning to good health. — ArtifexMayhem (talk) 08:28, 9 January 2013 (UTC) AE requestLast time at AE, you were instructed to refrain from filing new requests without first consulting with administrators. Did you? If not, I'd strongly recommend you remove the filing. As far as I'm concerned, I logged a warning for him and he hasn't edited since, so I don't really see why this shouldn't be put to rest now. Escalation is, again, in nobody's interest. Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:31, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
ANI notificationHello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. I'm dropping these templates on the talk pages of every user who has posted at Talk:Men's rights in the last two sections. This is not meant to imply that I necessarily find any of your edits problematic, and is simply meant to inform you. Kevin Gorman (talk) 07:01, 11 January 2013 (UTC) Thanks, but...That was my quote in response to YRC's personal attacks which I immediatelty selfreverted.·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 23:53, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Editor interactionI think it's a great thing that you're doing with the Doncram Orlady interaction. I really don't have time to do any of it myself (I wasn't even able to get any evidence provided), but the whole Nyttend angle has completely been missed, so if you have the time, it would be great if you could do a Doncram Nyttend interaction. Ryan Vesey 08:21, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
Re: User using tor nodes to editUpon reading the sections above and below the spot where I left my comment, I was rather confused, since I saw absolutely no indication that anyone except Doncram was claiming that Orlady and I were following people around. This confusion is why I said "It doesn't look like anyone here is suggesting wikihounding". I was also rather confused by the IP coming in suddenly, but since I had no evidence of malevolence, I didn't see any reason to bring it up. Your message helps resolve the issue in my mind; thank you. Nyttend (talk) 00:13, 29 January 2013 (UTC) Possibly unfree File:Keir-Collection-Quran-Bukhara-1545.jpgA file that you uploaded or altered, File:Keir-Collection-Quran-Bukhara-1545.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:58, 29 January 2013 (UTC) Possibly unfree File:Keir-Collection-Andalusian-Morrocan-Quran-1300.jpgA file that you uploaded or altered, File:Keir-Collection-Andalusian-Morrocan-Quran-1300.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:58, 29 January 2013 (UTC) Permanent links to a particular page versionThis is in response to concern raised at the Doncram Arbcom case regarding recent edits to pages cited as evidence... The standard recommendation is to provide diffs of a particular edit or links to a particular page version. That way, everyone sees the same evidence. You might want to replace some of your wikilinks to pages with links to a particular version of the page you cited. --Orlady (talk) 14:50, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
Your messageHi - in reply to your message, the rules are a bit unclear, but I see nothing in Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions that prohibits non-admins, or even involved editors, from issuing and logging warnings. Sandstein 08:45, 11 February 2013 (UTC) ThanksThanks for restoring the section title 'RfC close goes beyond the RfC question' which I appear to have deleted inadvertently. I was seconds behind you on the fix, but good to know you were on it! Jusdafax 22:36, 13 February 2013 (UTC) SPI case 2Did someone contact you asking you to place that case on hold? The IP address in question is an open HTTP proxy running on 8080 (I have verified this myself by using it). Cheers, SpitfireTally-ho! 14:46, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 4Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mass in B minor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Benedictus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 4 March 2013 (UTC) No-neck monstersGlad to see that you are finding some amusement (not to mention literary allusions) amongst the musty old U.S. buildings on the National Register of Historic Places. Thanks for your efforts to lighten things up (not to mention your fine work on explicating edit histories). --Orlady (talk) 20:12, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
AN NoticeHello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Crazynas t 07:50, 6 March 2013 (UTC) Tea Party movement arbitration case openedAn arbitration case in which you commented has been opened, and is located at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Tea Party movement. Evidence that you wish the Arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence sub-page, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Tea Party movement/Evidence. Please add your evidence by March 20, 2013, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can contribute to the case workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Tea Party movement/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 23:45, 6 March 2013 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for March 12Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Complexification (Lie group), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Section and Chow's theorem (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:02, 12 March 2013 (UTC) PerformersRegarding your comment on ACN: I agree that content is more important than performers. Andreas Scholl wasn't created by me, but seemed in need of improvement, as a person I know. I create performer's articles if they sing for us, or if I want to show content on the Main page but can't expand it 5*. - We just found Riana as a content editor. - Content more important than performers: I believe that is true for us editors also, I respect what George Ponderevo added to this project (and don't care which mind is behind the account), - I think I said the same in other words in the other forum, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:53, 17 March 2013 (UTC) Possibly unfree File:Monument-terreslointaines-Marseille.jpgA file that you uploaded or altered, File:Monument-terreslointaines-Marseille.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 01:38, 19 March 2013 (UTC) Maybe not the best idea?Hey, Mathsci, as silly as I think the ANI thread is, I don't think it's a good idea for you to keep moving the archive tag. It's only going to make things worse, from a drama point of view. Writ Keeper (t + c) 01:55, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
Membra Jesu nostriThank you for the improvements. I am in love with the piece. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:05, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
File:Allein-Gott-Spangenberg-1545.png missing description detailsDear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:
is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers. If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided. If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 04:50, 14 April 2013 (UTC)Precious againBach music A year ago, you were the 102nd recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, repeated in br'erly style, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:15, 21 April 2013 (UTC) Not Echigo MoleUser:Qaz122a is at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vvv321. Keri (talk) 16:52, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
A very loud duckI like the use of a duck quacking into a megaphone. It made me chuckle. :) Rockfang (talk) 21:19, 28 April 2013 (UTC) Your remarks at Talk:Hurwitz algebraYour remarks at Talk:Hurwitz algebra here, in which you praise your own articles and belittle mine, are not appropriate for an article talk page. I remind you of Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines: Talk pages are for improving the encyclopedia, not for expressing personal opinions on a subject or an editor. Deltahedron (talk) 06:18, 29 April 2013 (UTC) Your stubs are just stubs. No need to pretend otherwise. They won't suddenly become extended articles useful for learning. Your error is to imagine that the lede of an extended article can be treated as if it were a stub. On the contrary, the lede summarises the article and the article is a summary of material from the sources selected. So please don't editorialise in a lede to write content at odds with the main body of the article, treating it as if it were a stub. If an article is drawn from sources that use the real and complex numbers, suggesting otherwise in the lede is misleading and unhelpful to the reader. The normal method of teaching and presentation in textbooks (wikipedia articles are no different) is first to treat the standard cases where matters are simple (e.g. Lie elgebras over R and C, compact Lie groups, etc) and then mention greater generality in later subsections, comments or footnotes. You are at the moment concentrating on one of the smaller and easier parts of a theory that is part of the Jordan algebra approach to Hermitian symmetric spaces, the theory treated in the excellent source of Jacques Faraut and Adam Koranyi, pioneered by Max Koecher and his school. That material is not properly represented on wikipedia. I am now adding that material. You are discussing a tiny part of that programme. If you want to add comments about what might happen in general for arbitrary fields, do not do so prominently in the lede. That is WP:UNDUE. You can easily a section called "Further directions" summarising generalisations and surveying the literature. That is normal practise. No article on Lie algebras would treat anyhting other than R and C first and foremost. In 2011 and 2012, I made a similar series of edits related to the theory of univalent functions, quasiconformal mappings and Teichmüller theory, again an under-represented topic area on wikipedia. A classic source is Ahlfors' book on quasiconformal mappings. Here are some of the articles I created there ( I revamped other articles like Beltrami equation): Farrell–Markushevich theorem,Singular integral operators on closed curves, Neumann–Poincaré operator, Symmetrizable compact operator, Sobolev spaces for planar domains, Radó–Kneser–Choquet theorem, Douady–Earle extension, Singular integral operators of convolution type, Markov–Kakutani fixed-point theorem, Earle–Hamilton fixed-point theorem, Uniformly bounded representation, Weyl–von Neumann theorem, Oscillator representation, Positive harmonic function, Carathéodory kernel theorem, Loewner differential equation, Dirichlet space, Littlewood subordination theorem, Nevanlinna's criterion, Grunsky matrix (expanded), Grunsky's theorem, Koenigs function, Denjoy–Wolff theorem, Hartogs–Rosenthal theorem. With barely 3,500 content edits and less than a year here, you are a relatively new editor. As far as I am aware, I am among the main contributors in mathematics. So in summary please don't treat ledes as if they are stubs, with your own WP:OR editorilaising. A lede just summarises an article and needless generality confuses the reader. You're not helping to improve content at the moment. By agitating on my talk page, you are showing an unwillingless to repect WP:DEADLINE. A longer attention span is required for producing extended content. Mathsci (talk) 07:46, 29 April 2013 (UTC) The other day you wrote that if a Euclidean algebra is strictly larger than R then "the argument above shows that it contains H" (the quaternions). But earlier the article says that C is a Euclidean algebra. So isn't your statement wrong? Eric Kvaalen (talk) 12:20, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
AEUh, I already noticed that and reverted myself. You have now restored the sock's edit... Apteva (talk) 06:15, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 5Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Symmetric cone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Center (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:44, 5 May 2013 (UTC) Nomination of Einstein–Cartan–Evans theory for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Einstein–Cartan–Evans theory is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Einstein–Cartan–Evans theory until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -Jordgette [talk] 23:05, 10 May 2013 (UTC) Arbitration case "Race and politics" openedAn arbitration case in which you commented has been opened, and is located at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Race and politics. Evidence that you wish the Arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence sub-page, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Race and politics/Evidence. Please add your evidence by May 21, 2013, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can contribute to the case workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Race and politics/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 01:56, 14 May 2013 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for May 14Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jordan operator algebra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lebesgue space (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:38, 14 May 2013 (UTC) = Premature closing of MathSci's Rfe against D.Lazard by Future Perfect at Sunrise?I wish to notify you of a discussion that you were involved in.[3] Thanks. A Quest For Knowledge (talk) 15:40, 22 May 2013 (UTC) An apologyI need to apologise to you for my behaviour -- it was wrong, and I am sorry. A.K.Nole (talk) 16:00, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
Article notability notificationHello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote, Octacube (mathematics), has been recently tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: Find sources: "Octacube (mathematics)" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 22:16, 24 May 2013 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for June 16Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hermitian symmetric space, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jordan frame (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:51, 16 June 2013 (UTC) You know what's funny?I was actually in the process of moving that to WP:AN (where it should be) before it was deleted :) Dusti*poke* 06:46, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Jmh649 evidenceEvidence you asked for posted on the RFAR. PumpkinSky talk 10:48, 22 June 2013 (UTC) Thanksfor fixing Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case; I tried to fix it myself but was unable to. I appreciate the help. Drmies (talk) 20:55, 23 June 2013 (UTC) Johann SpangenbergCould you please tell me why the File:Spangenberg-1545.png is not allowed to use in the german and portuguese versions of Wikipedia? I would be glad to illustrate the biography of this author with it. Thank you very much.Claudio Pistilli (talk) 05:08, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
NostalgiaHi, do you remember: File:Ocnacube.jpg? It may have a copyright issue because of Freedom_of_panorama#United_States. If you can contact the good professor then that may be the easiest to sort it out. More details are at a fledgling project here: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Canoe1967/Sculptors --Canoe1967 (talk) 20:28, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
July 2013Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Marseille may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:14, 8 July 2013 (UTC) Possibly unfree File:Mucem-Villa-de-la-Mediterannee-Marseille.jpgA file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mucem-Villa-de-la-Mediterannee-Marseille.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:16, 9 July 2013 (UTC) Chevalley's "Algebraic theory of spinors and Clifford algebras"Hi: You mentioned this as a "standard downloadable reference" Algebraic theory of spinors and Clifford algebras which I would be interested in obtaining myself, and adding to the article. At the time I had assumed you had also meant "free," but my searches only turned up shady pirate sites. Can you point me to a legitimate free source for this? Thanks. Rschwieb (talk) 17:02, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
Infoboxes ArbCom case openedYou recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Infoboxes. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Infoboxes/Evidence. Please add your evidence by July 31, 2013, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Infoboxes/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, — ΛΧΣ21 17:58, 17 July 2013 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for July 27Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Symmetric cone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Complex structure (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 27 July 2013 (UTC) Your messageI agree with you, but so far they've made only the one edit. I believe it's a standard dynamic IP (Geolocate is not working at the moment), so I'll just try to keep an eye on them to see if they persist. It would be helpful to know if other IPs in that range are currently editing. Feel free to alert me to anything you see.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:42, 28 July 2013 (UTC) orbifold article-questions on talk pageYou have done a lot on this article. I put a few questions on the talk page yesterday. If these were to be discussed and answered within the article, they would be helpful to those who are mathematically similar to me. So, if and only if you have the inclination and the time,...-Thanks!76.218.104.120 (talk) 04:17, 21 August 2013 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for August 24Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Square root of a matrix, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Minimal polynomial (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:01, 24 August 2013 (UTC) hopefully you're better nowI noticed your passing reference to a stay in the hospital that is now over. A speedy and complete recovery to you. -- [ UseTheCommandLine ~/talk ]# ▄ 07:29, 26 August 2013 (UTC) New proposal regarding Wer900 at AN/IIn an effort to resolve the discussion at AN/I regarding Wer900, I have offered a new proposal at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Alternative proposal: Restriction on venues for complaints. Since you have weighed in on previous proposals regarding this user, I am notifying you of the new one in case you wish to opine. Regards, alanyst 18:46, 5 September 2013 (UTC) This is a courtesy notice to inform you that a motion which involves you has been proposed at the above named request for clarification. The motion can be viewed here. Please feel free to register your comments at the clarification request. For the Arbitration Committee, Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 19:53, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
|