This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
I'm sorry, but I had to write this message in Croatian.
Prekinite više stavljati Rusiju na popis, kao i to da nam za Nikaragvu i El Salvardor ne treba viza! Ne treba vjerovati Ministarstvu, već Timaticwebu jer se Timatic koristi u svim zračnim lukama i definitivno je bolji izvor informacija! A budući da se ne može u Rusiju tek tako, i da se vaučer ne može na granici dobiti, Rusija nema što raditi na popisu. A isti slučaj je i s Kubom koju napokon nitko ne spominje jer joj nije mjesto ovdje! 78.3.247.170 (talk) 06:59, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
Please do not add countries to this list which require you to obtain the in advance through a sponsor or otherwise and then physically stamp the visa into the passport on arrival. By that standard some of the most difficult countries in the world to get into like Bhutan, Libya or Saudi Arabia would be VOA and that is not what this list implies when listing visa-free and visa-on-arrival countries. Travelbird (talk) 12:27, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
I also removed these as these do not require a simple internet registration but rather give you the option to apply online for a visa. In contrast to ESTA or eVisitor these applications aren't simply automatically checked against a database, but rather manually processed like any visa application and thus take significantly longer than a simple registration. Travelbird (talk) 12:30, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
I have found conflicting sources about Visa requirements for Marshall Islands:
Croatian Ministry says 30 days: [1].
Marshall Islands Visitors Authority says 90 days: [2].
Timatic says visa is required: [3].
Does anyone know which one is correct? Merkhet (talk) 17:27, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
Article intro claim that "Croatian citizens had visa-free or visa on arrival access to 129 countries and territories, ranking the Croatian passport 26th in the world (lowest ranking of all EU member states)". I can not open the source but that at least should not be correct since there are 28 EU member states even if any non-EU state is not in the top 26.--MirkoS18 (talk) 22:19, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Hello, when I opened the tiamatic for Montserrat, it is written that
Visa required, except for Holders of a valid visa issued by a an EU Member State
And can you tell me, has someone informed them about the change that Croatia is an EU country? Thank you.
This also applies for Cayman Islands, Turks and Caicos, Falkland Islands. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.29.197.151 (talk) 14:34, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
The timaticweb.com links don't seem to talk in terms of reciprocities, they just state the facts for one direction of travel. To figure out that a treaty is violated, the reader has to infer it from two separate sources, only one of which is referenced. This is more generally a bit of a WP:NOTGUIDE violation. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 12:21, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
You seem to be creating issues where they don't exist. For an example you just tried to re-add link rot maintenance template over subjective view that it's not enough despite the fact that the bare link definition - WP:BAREURLS - provided in the template itself clearly says "A bare URL is a URL cited as a reference for some information in an article without any accompanying information about the linked page. In other words, it is just the text out of the URL bar of your browser copied and pasted into the Wiki text, inserted between the <ref> tags or simply provided as an external link, without title, author, date, or any of the usual information necessary for a bibliographic citation.". I don't think I can possibly satisfy you on way more vague issue of original research so I will just leave it as it is. Enjoy your day and inexplicable template tagging over other people's work, I am sure that's the "joy" part.--Twofortnights (talk) 19:40, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
According to the Tiamatic Croatian nationals do not require visa any more.
Also, for Montserrat there is a conflicting information, no need of a visa if visa issued by one of the EU countries. But Croatia IS an EU country. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.157.8.235 (talk) 20:07, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Visa requirements for Croatian citizens. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add ((cbignore))
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add ((nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot))
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check))
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:39, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 6 external links on Visa requirements for Croatian citizens. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add ((cbignore))
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add ((nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot))
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check))
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:16, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
In all good efforts to unify Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons, I believe this image should be changed to the way you see it now. Please, do not hesitate, if you have anything to claim, to do so. Any civil manners of reaching a consensus are well appreciated. Twofortnights, I would love to hear from you as well but also from others, seeing as how you are one of many people. Thank you for everything thus far!
I have reverted changes made by LukaRatic again, because they are false statements. "Restrictions for workers to be lifted starting from 1 July 2018" unequivocally informs that 2018 is the date of lifting restrictions, which, in many cases can be easily proven untrue. If you read references on the article that was linked to in the original edit - Freedom of movement for workers in the European Union, which I have added again - you will notice that United Kingdom has no intention to lift restrictions in 2018. Switzerland also plans to keep restrictions in place for as long as possible. The decision by each country (whether to extend transition period) is usually decreed only days before expiration of the ongoing period. --Merkhet (talk) 10:32, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello, everyone,
Since Croatia will not be included into the VWP program until 1 Dec 2021, don't you think that it is too early to change the visa requirements for Croatian citizens to the United States? It might be potentially misleading to readers. They might believe that Croatian citizens could travel to the United States right now instead of two months later. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Temptation115 (talk • contribs) 20:25, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Can we stop reverting map to png where we only have one color, i.e. for visa and visa free?
I have created svg file since it is more logical. Green for visa free, ETA and visa on arrival. That is in accordance to the main table where we use green color for visa free.
I have chosen, red for visa, but also eVisa, eVisitor and visa online, logically, since we use that color in the table also.
Blue color is obviously for freedom of movement. Black is logical candidate for ban, not red, that might seem logival at first.
Even though every wikipedia page for visa requirement use different color sheme, we can use these two colors since they are quickly spotted on map. If we have only one shade of color, i.e. green, you cannot easily spot countries that require visa, or are visa free. Some users are regularly reverting the map to old one, i.e. shades of green. And some revert due to the fact that I chose Australia as not visa free. I have explained why is Australia not visa free, and Henley is also considering it as not visa free. Since we are using Henley as a standard here, it is logical to have Australia as not visa free. The decision of the European Commission ruling that the eVisitor's autogrant treatment is not an equivalent to the Schengen visa application procedures might have confused some people, who thought, "Ok this means visa free", but in reality if you wait days or months for autogrant as some people do, it is definetly not visa free. There is a reason why Australia has 2 visa schemes, one for West Europe, i.e. ETA, and one for East Europe, i.e. eVisitor. They treat us in the East as second class of EU. Unfortunately, politicians are not doing anything to change it.
If someone has a better idea for color scheme, please reply here, and also about Australia.Vardown (talk) 23:34, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
A few months ago I introduced a new section with 3 tables, and now 5. Other wikipedia pages don't have that section, so some users are not happy.
Here is my logic. When you are new on the page and you are wondering what countries Croatian citizens can travel, you don't want to read some long table with sources and explanations, which is basically a section with Full list of countries and visa requirements table. That's why I had an idea to collapse that table and also 2 more tables that I changed a little to be like other country pages, and I also collapsed them for better visibility.
Now these 5 tables stand out as a quick reference where you can travel visa free, and where you need a visa. Henley doesn't publish full list of countries like that so when something changes in visa programs, we can easily spot it.
Those of you who don't like it, we can delete it, but we should have some discussion about it. We want our page to be better than others, not just standard looking page, and even if we want a "standard" page, that should also evolve in time. Write your comments here, so we can come up with something.Vardown (talk) 17:19, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Visa requirements for Croatian citizens's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "index":
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 08:06, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Could you check the info for Croatian citizens with Namibia authorities? Croatia claims that its citizens can in fact get visa on arrival: https://mvep.gov.hr/services-for-citizens/consular-information-22802/visas-22807/visa-requirements-overview-22879/22879?country=195 Val5678678 (talk) 10:00, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
Since June, 1st no visa required for stay up to 60 days. 49.230.112.124 (talk) 02:45, 4 June 2024 (UTC)