This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Godzilla: Unleashed article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find video game sources: "Godzilla: Unleashed" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
Archives: 1, 2, 3 |
![]() | This page is not a forum for general discussion about Godzilla: Unleashed. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Godzilla: Unleashed at the Reference desk. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
The scores are actually pretty low. Gamespot gave it a 3 or so, and the page here shows it as a 9.5 130.212.25.101 (talk) 02:34, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
I just archived the page again, now that the game is out. --98.193.61.220 (talk) 21:30, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
Head's up, I removed all the excessive lists. It is game guide material, not a summary of gameplay (see here).--CM (talk) 20:12, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Please mention why you are reverting certain edits which I have given full reason to why I have. If you don't that would be considered trolling/vandalism, notably if you revert multiple times in a row within 24 hours. You must state your reasons. If you think mine are wrong discuss them here. Stabby Joe (talk) 12:08, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
This is a response to Stabby's request at my talk page. Though, it seems like ages since I last did an assessment for WP:VG/A, I'll have a go...
Currently, this article is very nice. It's a healthy overall length and has a number of images (with fair use rationales - yay!). Having said that, I think it's borderline Start/B. It's definitely not far from B (or GA, for that matter). Here are some things which, if rectified, would get you up to B in my books:
Other things which aren't essential to get this article from Start to B but shouldn't take too long to sort out:
Well, that's all that springs to mind at present. If you have any questions, feel free to ask. Hope this helps, Una LagunaTalk 20:42, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
i've seen this game on nintendo DS too. why it doesn't say anything at all about this in the article seems a little odd.... 86.154.117.100 (talk) 13:40, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
It says "Several cities are seen being destroyed by the crystals when SpaceGodzilla and the Mutants have won, when suddenly SpaceGodzilla appears and roars in triumph." That makes no sense. Shouldn't it be "Several cities are seen being destroyed by the crystals when Krystalak and the Mutants have won, when suddenly SpaceGodzilla appears and roars in triumph."? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.26.133.148 (talk) 19:56, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
The mutants are led by Spacegodzilla, so when the mutants win, of course Spacegodzilla's gonna roar in triumph. - An anonymous Godzilla expert —Preceding unsigned comment added by GodzillaUnleashed (talk • contribs) 22:36, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
True, but saying "Spacegodzilla and the Mutants have won" and then saying "when suddenly Spacegodzilla appears" is paradoxical. Besides, Krystalak is ment to appear to be the leader of the mutants until Spacegodzilla is revealed. 75.157.92.36 (talk) 16:48, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
I've played through the game and the only way you can reach the Tyrant level is by getting all the power surges, which nullifies all alliances. 75.157.67.184 (talk) 06:37, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
It nullifies all alliances with you, as you've become so corrupt that all the other monsters no longer trust you.
- An anonymous Godzilla expert
What sub-endings? Like, do you have to be a GDF in Critical Mass when you beat the game or not kill Space-godzilla or something? Or does it have to do with your alliances? 75.157.92.36 (talk) 16:51, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
Someone has been adding false information about a 5th faction. THERE IS NO 5TH FACTION! Yet that someone keeps re-adding the false information like it's real! --BNSF1995 (talk) 03:25, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
It was the Oxygen Destroyer weapon that destroyed the original Godzilla in 1954. Destroyah didn't appear until decades later. Jdaniels15 (talk) 14:59, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
A lot of people are thinking Zilla would've an Earth Defender if he'd made it into the game just because he lives on Earth. Well aside from that, there is no reason for him to be a part of the Earth Defenders faction. He is more or less a Mutant. He was mutated from an Iguana and destroyed boats on his way to New York City, killing tons of people and he smashed up several buildings in the City. Of course Godzilla was mutated and killed in his first film, but here's the differance, he evolved into a defender of the Earth and saved it from Aliens and Mutants. Zilla never expressed interest in saving humanity, much like all other Mutants. It makes more sense for him to be part of the Mutant Faction, unless anyone can give me reasons to suggest otherwise.
The point is people keep changing the section when I'm actually trying to correct it, so if anyone can give reason for him being an Earth Defender, he should remain as (Likely would've been a Mutant) --390VirginPendolino390 (talk) 11:02, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
I'm having a problem. Lately this guy, 76.218.28.177, keeps changing the words in the Godzilla: Unleashed article from "a Mutant" to "an Mutant"! I keep changing it back, but he keeps reverting the article as if "an Mutant" is not a grammar problem when it actually is! He keeps insisting that "an Mutant" is correct, but it isn't! Which wording is correct? Is it "a Mutant" or "an Mutant"? I'm dying to know, okay? --Angeldeb82 (talk) 02:14, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Godzilla: Unleashed. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check))
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:08, 11 January 2018 (UTC)