American transportation in the Siegfried Line campaign is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on February 23, 2023.
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
The background section says "Under the Operation Overlord plan, US forces would be supported over the Omaha and Utah landing beaches and the port of Cherbourg in Normandy" and the delay in taking and using Cherbourg and that "the beaches consistently failed to meet their targets, averaging only 20,000 to 25,000 long tons (20,000 to 25,000 t) per day" but the plan envisaged the Mulberry. GraemeLeggett (talk) 20:26, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The article uses the word "deadlined" repeatedly starting with "Over 15,000 vehicles were deadlined, awaiting repairs or parts." This usage is new and unfamiliar to me – meaning inoperable, unserviceable, unusable, off the road, out of action, &c. The article links to Wiktionary but that's not a reliable source and neither of its references support the usage. The OED has a different military meaning ("A line drawn around a military prison, beyond which a prisoner is liable to be shot down. Originally U.S.") but not the article's usage. As this seems to be US military slang, I suggest amendment per MOS:JARGON. Andrew🐉(talk) 09:42, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It is not slang; it is official usage. The Wiktionary provides the definition "(military) To render an item non-mission-capable; to ground an aircraft, etc" It was there to enable readers to look it up, not as a reference.
And, being curious about the original term, I find it defined in the Dictionary of United States Army Terms, "Any major end item of authorized equipment charged to a using unit or agency which has been removed from operation or immediate ooperational readiness because of actual or potential mechanical, electrical or safety device failure. It does not include equipment scheduled for routine prevention maintenance or inspection."
And I find that we have some amusing pictures, (right). I'm still looking for a detailed origin of the term as the prison camp usage doesn't seem quite the same.
I've stumbled upon the following paragraph in this article, which doesn't make sense to me, specifically its last sentence:
"Barge traffic on the Seine was obstructed by a pair of ponton bridges. They had to be opened to allow barges through, but this interrupted motor traffic. At Le Manoir there was a railway bridge built by the British that was too low to permit barge traffic. The bridge was raised in October, but then the river rose in November as the Seine flooded, reducing clearance below the minimum again. The river rose so high it was feared that the bridge would be washed away, and consideration was given to moving British supplies from Normandy via Paris instead."
The Seine river actually IS the inland waterway used to ship goods from Normandy via Paris, so a blocked Seine cannot be circumvented "from Normandy via Paris instead". What was the actual alternative considered, if any?