This is Tvx1's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6Auto-archiving period: 30 days

Hi Tvx1.

I see that the Draft:2023 Poland Darts Masters is still in the draft version. I have added an independent link to Sky Sports who covered the tournament.

Is this not enough to move it from a draft to an actual page? Other pages in that year's tournament such as;

• 2023 Bahrain Darts Masters
• 2023 Nordic Darts Masters
• 2023 US Darts Masters etc. all have pages?

Your help is much appreciated!

Regarding this edit, please avoid edit warring, even if you think you are right. It is consider disruptive. Per WP:STATUSQUO and Wikipedia:Edit warring, I encourage you to revert yourself and engage in a discussion on the talk page. Cerebral726 (talk) 20:34, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Joely Collins. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. You are already way past WP:3RR. See also WP:BRD, WP:ONUS, WP:STATUSQUO, and WP:CONSENSUS. You were bold. That's great. When you were reverted, you should have gone to the article's talk page to discuss, not continue to revert. Since you are the one trying to make this change, the onus is on you to start a discussion. You do not have consensus for your change. Until and if a consensus is reached, the status quo remains. Amaury • 23:35, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Amaury. Where is your warning for the other person? They actually reverted multiple editors on sight for months at Joely Collins. Tvx1 23:43, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

He was restoring the article to the WP:STATUSQUO, as he was today. When an editor attempts to add something, whether it's you or whoever, and they are reverted, it is their duty to start the discussion and discuss the matter, not the one who reverted. Your refusal to WP:DROPTHESTICK and discuss the matter instead means you are either unable or unwilling to abide by simple procedures. Instead, you kept reverting on your insistence of "I am right!1!1" Amaury • 23:47, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

But they were edit warring on that article for MONTHS. Restoring to status-quo also doesn't give one the right to ignore policies like WP:3RR. And I actually did try to discuss with them on their page and it's doesn't help. They on the other hand never made any attempt to discuss.Tvx1 00:06, 2 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Tvx1 reported by User:Amaury (Result: ). Thank you. Amaury • 23:38, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Joely Collins) for a period of 1 week for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)).  ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 23:41, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]