SummerFunMan (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Suspected sockpuppets

• P004ME2 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
• Editor interaction utility

An SPA created on 21 November has declined an edit warring report against SummerFunMan (diff). This looks like a sockpuppet to me but not quite a DUCK. CheckUser evidence is likely necessary to confirm that sockpuppeting is going on. Seahorseruler ^{(Talk Page) (Contribs)} 09:02, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Both users also seem to sign their comments in the same style, almost like they are writing a letter ("Best wihes," or "Respectfully yours," - diff and diff) --Seahorseruler ^{(Talk Page) (Contribs)} 09:14, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Oh, that is very telling (as if we're the only 2 users in all of English Wikipedia who would do that)! P004ME2 (talk) 09:33, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Additional information: After the investigation was filed, P004ME2 has been disruptively attempting to close the 3RR case multiple times (1, 2, 3) ignoring warnings. --Seahorseruler ^{(Talk Page) (Contribs)} 10:14, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Um... but now I've already stopped. P004ME2 (talk) 10:51, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

• It should be noted that P004ME2 attempted to close a 3RR/EW complaint against SummerFunMan. GraniteSand (talk) 09:09, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Already noted in the evidence, Thanks. --Seahorseruler ^{(Talk Page) (Contribs)} 09:26, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Sirs, please do tell me, if you kindly would, how you have come to the conclusion that I'm a so-called "SPA," will you? What similarities do you see between my articles about ebay, sirens, walmart, manual transmissions, and a video game system? In my estimation, those are all very different. I don't see evidence that should lead anyone to believe those amount to SPA. Will you explain?

P004ME2 (talk) 09:14, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• I smell a sock maybe not this particular person but maybe, either way it's fairly obvious this is a sock farm. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 09:31, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Sock farm"! P004ME2 (talk) 09:36, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• SPAs include editors who have made little or no other contributions. Your few scattered and random contributions immediately prior to editing the 3RR noticeboard were few enough for you to still be considered a SPA. --Seahorseruler ^{(Talk Page) (Contribs)} 10:10, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response, Seahorse. So you figure I really created my account just to try to close a case even before I knew that case would be happening (and then tried to "disguise" that by making a few edits to other articles "immediately" [a few days equate to "immediacy" to you] before)?

P004ME2 (talk) 10:30, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed that the following accounts are technically completely indistinguishable. Risker (talk) 17:29, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• P004ME2 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• SummerFunMan (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Both accounts blocked indefinitely. m.o.p 17:32, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]