Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Manual transmission has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
You have been warned multiple times by multiple users not to close cases inappropriately. The case has not yet been reviewed by an Administrator and therefor can not be closed. If you continue to close cases inapropriately, it will be constituted as vandalism. --Seahorseruler(Talk Page)(Contribs)09:48, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Seahorseruler, are you saying that Bbb23 is not an administrator, then?
Also, were you thinking of ever actually answering my question of how you two figure that my account is an SPA (even with the diversity of the subject matter of the articles that I've worked on)? That section does say that the accused can comment and question in there too, does it not? Then shouldn't the accused also receive replies?
You are not an Administrator so you may not decline cases yourself. Bbb23 has only commented on the case. No Administrators have decided whether or not to take any action yet, so the case is still open. I will reply to your questions regarding sockpuppet accusations on the investigation page. Seahorseruler(Talk Page)(Contribs)10:06, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Not that I have a vested interest in that, but a curious question: Why doesn't Bbb23's comment count as a review?
Because he explicitly labelled it as a comment, and he was perfectly able to close the section by himself if that was his intention. Don't try it again. —Cryptic10:15, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, but I was asking Seahorse. Maybe you are a sockpuppet, Cryptic. How do you other users suddenly get attracted to a discussion out of nowhere?