Rejected request for mediation concerning Falafel
| ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Falafel[edit]
Issues to be mediated[edit]All aspects of article content over which there is disagreement should be listed here. The filing party should define the scope under "Primary issues", which is used to frame the case; other parties to the dispute can list other issues under "Additional issues", and can contest the primary issues on the case talk page.
Parties' agreement to mediation[edit]All parties please indicate below whether they agree to mediation of this dispute; remember to sign your post. Extended comments should be made on the case talk page. Every party listed above will be automatically notified that this request has been filed.
Decision of the Mediation Committee[edit]A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate whether this request is to be accepted or rejected. Notes concerning the request and questions to the parties may also be posed by a committee member in this section.
|
Rejected request for mediation concerning Theory of ionic weapons
| ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Theory of ionic weapons[edit]
Issues to be mediated[edit]what happened was some foolish admin who didn't even read the article properly, deleted it and passed it off as a blatant hoax I can in fact Prove its not a hoax , i contested speedy deletion yet the admins don't understand the meaning of READ THE ARTICLE PLEASE BEFORE DELETION i believe that the admin selected is not up to the job and should have his/her status lowered due to the fact of making a seriously wrong and disgusting mistake of violating my rights as an individual and deleting a perfectly normal and correct page which would educate wikipedians i even said that i can provide evidence! yet no e-mail no nothing and bam deleted. I DEMAND AN ENTIRE ARGUMENT AS TO WHY MY PAGE WAS DELETED im quite upset due to the fact my page which took precious time of my life was deleted because of an absolute idiot who can't read. YOURS DISGUSTEDLY! the case talk page.
Parties' agreement to mediation[edit]i agree to the mediation and my decision is to lower the status of the administrator or even BAN the administrator resposible for this horrible , wrong , stupid and pathetic act the case talk page. Every party listed above will be automatically notified that this request has been filed.
Decision of the Mediation Committee[edit]A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate whether this request is to be accepted or rejected. Notes concerning the request and questions to the parties may also be posed by a committee member in this section.
|
Rejected request for mediation concerning men's rights movement
| ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Men's rights movement[edit]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Men%27s_rights#Why_has_this_page_been_changed.3F Although some editors believed that over the last month the entire content of the "men's rights" page was vandalized, following this discussion it was clear that the editors considered the "men's rights" and "men's rights movement" topics as separate entities, just as "women's rights" and "feminism" are separate. Therefore it was prudent to create a new "men's rights movement" page with the original text from the "men's rights" page in order to differentiate between the two terms. Note that "men's movement" is a superset of the "men's rights movement", the "father's rights movement", and various other related movements, and therefore is inadequate to describe the "men's rights movement". Once the new "men's rights movement" page was created, Fluffernutter (talk · contribs) repeatedly reverted the new page in its entirety, instead automatically redirecting to the men's rights section as it previously had done. After I explained that "men's rights" and "men's rights movement" are two different entities, Fluffernutter claimed that copying Wikipedia content to another Wikipedia content is a violation of Wikipedia:COPYVIO, but I see no case for that. See here: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jayhammers&redirect=no#Your_edits_to_Men.27s_rights_movement Fluffernutter then locked the men's rights movement page from further changes. Issues to be mediated[edit]All aspects of article content over which there is disagreement should be listed here. The filing party should define the scope under "Primary issues", which is used to frame the case; other parties to the dispute can list other issues under "Additional issues", and can contest the primary issues on the case talk page.
Parties' agreement to mediation[edit]All parties please indicate below whether they agree to mediation of this dispute; remember to sign your post. Extended comments should be made on the case talk page. Every party listed above will be automatically notified that this request has been filed.
Decision of the Mediation Committee[edit]A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate whether this request is to be accepted or rejected. Notes concerning the request and questions to the parties may also be posed by a committee member in this section.
|
Rejected request for mediation concerning Comparison of color models in computer graphics
| ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Comparison of color models in computer graphics[edit]
Issues to be mediated[edit]All aspects of article content over which there is disagreement should be listed here. The filing party should define the scope under "Primary issues", which is used to frame the case; other parties to the dispute can list other issues under "Additional issues", and can contest the primary issues on the case talk page.
Parties' agreement to mediation[edit]All parties please indicate below whether they agree to mediation of this dispute; remember to sign your post. Extended comments should be made on the case talk page. Every party listed above will be automatically notified that this request has been filed.
Decision of the Mediation Committee[edit]A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate whether this request is to be accepted or rejected. Notes concerning the request and questions to the parties may also be posed by a committee member in this section.
|
Rejected request for mediation concerning Yoghurt
| ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yoghurt[edit]
Issues to be mediated[edit]All aspects of article content over which there is disagreement should be listed here. The filing party should define the scope under "Primary issues", which is used to frame the case; other parties to the dispute can list other issues under "Additional issues", and can contest the primary issues on the case talk page.
Parties' agreement to mediation[edit]All parties please indicate below whether they agree to mediation of this dispute; remember to sign your post. Extended comments should be made on the case talk page. Every party listed above will be automatically notified that this request has been filed.
Decision of the Mediation Committee[edit]A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate whether this request is to be accepted or rejected. Notes concerning the request and questions to the parties may also be posed by a committee member in this section.
|
Rejected request for mediation concerning Admins assuming bad faith
| ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Admins assuming bad faith[edit]
Issues to be mediated[edit]Antandrus has gone too far in failing to assume good faith on the part of the article. I made an effort to make genuine commentary on his actions as a wikipedia admin and its long-term effects on the project itself--I pointed out that by forcefully banning and having a bad attitude toward new editors and telling them to "stop wasting our time", he's damaging the project, and that this kind of attitude will discourage future editors from sticking around. Without a doubt my commentary may have taken a sort of snarky attitude, but it's clear that putting forward sass is not a legitimate reason to ban someone indefinitely, particularly when that user has a history of useful contributions.
Parties' agreement to mediation[edit]All parties please indicate below whether they agree to mediation of this dispute; remember to sign your post. Extended comments should be made on the case talk page. Every party listed above will be automatically notified that this request has been filed.
Decision of the Mediation Committee[edit]A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate whether this request is to be accepted or rejected. Notes concerning the request and questions to the parties may also be posed by a committee member in this section.
|
Rejected request for mediation concerning TimeClock Plus
| ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TimeClock Plus[edit]
Issues to be mediated[edit]All aspects of article content over which there is disagreement should be listed here. The filing party should define the scope under "Primary issues", which is used to frame the case; other parties to the dispute can list other issues under "Additional issues", and can contest the primary issues on the case talk page.
Parties' agreement to mediation[edit]All parties please indicate below whether they agree to mediation of this dispute; remember to sign your post. Extended comments should be made on the case talk page. Every party listed above will be automatically notified that this request has been filed.
Decision of the Mediation Committee[edit]A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate whether this request is to be accepted or rejected. Notes concerning the request and questions to the parties may also be posed by a committee member in this section.
|
Rejected request for mediation concerning Trial of Conrad Murray
| ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Trial of Conrad Murray[edit]
None Issues to be mediated[edit]All aspects of article content over which there is disagreement should be listed here. The filing party should define the scope under "Primary issues", which is used to frame the case; other parties to the dispute can list other issues under "Additional issues", and can contest the primary issues on the case talk page.
Parties' agreement to mediation[edit]All parties please indicate below whether they agree to mediation of this dispute; remember to sign your post. Extended comments should be made on the case talk page. Every party listed above will be automatically notified that this request has been filed.
Decision of the Mediation Committee[edit]A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate whether this request is to be accepted or rejected. Notes concerning the request and questions to the parties may also be posed by a committee member in this section.
|
Rejected request for mediation concerning Blue Army (Poland)
| ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Blue Army (Poland) 2[edit]
Dispute specifics[edit]
Issues to be mediated[edit]
All aspects of article content over which there is disagreement should be listed here. The filing party should define the scope under "Primary issues", which is used to frame the case; other parties to the dispute can list other issues under "Additional issues", and can contest the primary issues on the case talk page.
Parties' agreement to mediation[edit]All parties please indicate below whether they agree to mediation of this dispute; remember to sign your post. Extended comments should be made on the case talk page. Every party listed above will be automatically notified that this request has been filed.
Decision of the Mediation Committee[edit]A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate whether this request is to be accepted or rejected. Notes concerning the request and questions to the parties may also be posed by a committee member in this section.
|
Lion's Share[edit]
Issues to be mediated[edit]All aspects of article content over which there is disagreement should be listed here. The filing party should define the scope under "Primary issues", which is used to frame the case; other parties to the dispute can list other issues under "Additional issues", and can contest the primary issues on the case talk page.
Parties' agreement to mediation[edit]All parties please indicate below whether they agree to mediation of this dispute; remember to sign your post. Extended comments should be made on the case talk page. Every party listed above will be automatically notified that this request has been filed. Decision of the Mediation Committee[edit]A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate whether this request is to be accepted or rejected. Notes concerning the request and questions to the parties may also be posed by a committee member in this section.
|
Rejected request for mediation concerning Yugoslav Partisans
| ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yugoslav Partisans[edit]
Issues to be mediated[edit]All aspects of article content over which there is disagreement should be listed here. The filing party should define the scope under "Primary issues", which is used to frame the case; other parties to the dispute can list other issues under "Additional issues", and can contest the primary issues on the case talk page.
Parties' agreement to mediation[edit]All parties please indicate below whether they agree to mediation of this dispute; remember to sign your post. Extended comments should be made on the case talk page. Every party listed above will be automatically notified that this request has been filed.
Decision of the Mediation Committee[edit]A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate whether this request is to be accepted or rejected. Notes concerning the request and questions to the parties may also be posed by a committee member in this section.
|
Rejected request for mediation concerning Hispaniola
| ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hispaniola[edit]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Hispaniola#Controversy Issues to be mediated[edit]"Primary issues:Wrong name asing to an article." The name in the article of the Island was unofficially given to it without consent of both governments/nations that inhabit the Island? The island was named by the United States Geographic Board. Therefore, it is recognized by one (The united States)single country, and a handful of English Speaking countries. Whereas, the Name Island of Santo Domingo, is used wolrdwide, as well as its french translatino Saint Domingue.Additional issues: One User, Student7, keeps refusing to change the name, even though there have been countless attempts by a number of users. studnet7 refuses to agree to compromise between two different parties. atempts
Parties' agreement to mediation[edit]All parties please indicate below whether they agree to mediation of this dispute; remember to sign your post. Extended comments should be made on the case talk page. Every party listed above will be automatically notified that this request has been filed.
Decision of the Mediation Committee[edit]A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate whether this request is to be accepted or rejected. Notes concerning the request and questions to the parties may also be posed by a committee member in this section.
|
Rejected request for mediation concerning Occidental Petroleum
| ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Occidental Petroleum[edit]
Because of the importance of BLP, and the extra sanctions administrators may invoke to enforce it, citing BLP in inappropriate circumstances can be seen as a Godwin's Law type of argument, which serves to alienate and bully other editors. Editors who cry "BLP!" in an inappropriate context should be warned that such stifles free discussion, and that they may be blocked for disruptive editing if invoking BLP as justification for an edit when BLP clearly did not apply.Cowboy128 (talk) 02:44, 16 December 2011 (UTC) Issues to be mediated[edit]All aspects of article content over which there is disagreement should be listed here. The filing party should define the scope under "Primary issues", which is used to frame the case; other parties to the dispute can list other issues under "Additional issues", and can contest the primary issues on the case talk page.
Parties' agreement to mediation[edit]All parties please indicate below whether they agree to mediation of this dispute; remember to sign your post. Extended comments should be made on the case talk page. Every party listed above will be automatically notified that this request has been filed.
Decision of the Mediation Committee[edit]A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate whether this request is to be accepted or rejected. Notes concerning the request and questions to the parties may also be posed by a committee member in this section.
|
Rejected request for mediation concerning Liam Neeson
| ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liam Neeson[edit]
Issues to be mediated[edit]All aspects of article content over which there is disagreement should be listed here. The filing party should define the scope under "Primary issues", which is used to frame the case; other parties to the dispute can list other issues under "Additional issues", and can contest the primary issues on the case talk page.
The use of "Irish" and the omission of "British" is a point of contention, there seems to be forced consistent (over a very long period) bias with nationalist/racial agendas as can be seen in the chat based on Northern Ireland being part of the UK or Eire or both.
Parties' agreement to mediation[edit]All parties please indicate below whether they agree to mediation of this dispute; remember to sign your post. Extended comments should be made on the case talk page. Every party listed above will be automatically notified that this request has been filed.
Northern Ireland as Great Britain in the talk pages was one single comment which has already been explained as a mistype/mistake. The overall problem is much greater than that one mistype and predates it. The premise of this mediation request being that as born in Northern Ireland does by law mean British, unless an Irish passport negates that. This is also in the Good Friday Agreement. The issue is not that Ireland or Irish should be mentioned but that the continued deletion of the ADDITIONAL use of British is not acceptable and contrary to fact. An informal attempt at resolution has already been made since the very problem is that the 'Irish faction' block and revert any statement of 'British' or even the additional "Northern Ireland, United Kingdom" -which altogether DOES smack of nationalist agenda.Bunnyman78 (talk) 13:38, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
[1] Quoted that as an 'Irish actor' there is absolutely no reason why one should not be also stated as a British actor. He is unaware or ignoring the unique complexities and sensitivities of identity in Northern Ireland. [2] Adding United Kingdom in when it is trivial knowledge that Northern Ireland is in the UK, pointy. [3] Same as above. [4] Same again and adds that Northern Ireland is part of Great Britain which is incorrect. [5] Same as above and unneccessarily inserts United Kingdom in another area. Also edited under this IP:83.248.32.132, see evidence here [6] The IP then made this pointy edit [7], removing Irish and just inserting British without consensus. And does it again here, [8].
Decision of the Mediation Committee[edit]A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate whether this request is to be accepted or rejected. Notes concerning the request and questions to the parties may also be posed by a committee member in this section.
|
Rejected request for mediation concerning Tamil People
| ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tamil People[edit]
Issues to be mediated[edit]All aspects of article content over which there is disagreement should be listed here. The filing party should define the scope under "Primary issues", which is used to frame the case; other parties to the dispute can list other issues under "Additional issues", and can contest the primary issues on the case talk page.
Parties' agreement to mediation[edit]All parties please indicate below whether they agree to mediation of this dispute; remember to sign your post. Extended comments should be made on the case talk page. Every party listed above will be automatically notified that this request has been filed.
Decision of the Mediation Committee[edit]A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate whether this request is to be accepted or rejected. Notes concerning the request and questions to the parties may also be posed by a committee member in this section.
|
Rejected request for mediation concerning Slide-rule
| ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Slide-rule[edit]
WP:ELN --- I was told to go here by Dr.K, which I did. All of that discussion has disappeared however. There is no record of it having ever been there now. I don't know who deleted it, or how they did this without leaving any trail.
Issues to be mediated[edit]All aspects of article content over which there is disagreement should be listed here. The filing party should define the scope under "Primary issues", which is used to frame the case; other parties to the dispute can list other issues under "Additional issues", and can contest the primary issues on the case talk page.
About two years ago, I added a section to the slide-rule article on building slide-rules, in which I described my software for generating CNC gcode for slide-rule images. Wtshymanski deleted this. I discussed this with him and he said that he would provide a link to my webpage in the external links section, which he did. I agreed with this compromise. That link was there for many months. I upgraded the link at one time to mention that my software also generates PostScript files for photo-lithography. The link remained for a long time. Recently I noticed that the link had been deleted. I don't know who deleted it, when it was deleted, or why I hadn't been informed automatically (I had checked the "Watch this page" button). I put the link back in. Dr.K then reverted this. I discussed this with him on my talk page, and he told me to take the issue to the external-links page, which I did. Over there, I discussed the issue with WhatamIdoing, who says that nobody will ever have enough interest in slide-rules to build the things, and that he himself has never had enough interest in slide-rules to read the entire article. He says that my "passion for slide-rules" had "misled" me to waste my time writing software for generating slide-rule images. That may be true, but being a boring person is not a violation of any Wikipedia rule. At this time, Dr.K said: "go ahead and include it." So I included the link. Dr.K reverted this again, and he stated on my talk page that I would be blocked from Wikipedia for violating the 3-reversion rule if I ever included that link again --- this is despite the fact that he himself had told me to include it. I would like the link to be included. My program is the only non-proprietary software in the world (afaik) that generates CNC gcode and PostScript images of slide-rules, for use in manufacturing anodized-aluminum slide-rules. Obviously, anybody who is interested in slide-rules, is going to be interested in building them. The purpose of the external links section is to provide links to related webpages, which mine clearly is. The arguments against this, so far, have been:
Obvious rebuttals are as follows:
Users of my software can mix-and-match which scales they provide and the layout of those scales. The aluminum slide-rules can be mass-produced, but the photo-lithography done just-in-time --- this allows the customer to obtain a customized slide-rule at a mass-production price --- this is way beyond anything that was possible in the 1970s. Anybody who is interested in slide-rules is going to be interested in my software. Hugh Aguilar (talk) 23:01, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
Parties' agreement to mediation[edit]All parties please indicate below whether they agree to mediation of this dispute; remember to sign your post. Extended comments should be made on the case talk page. Every party listed above will be automatically notified that this request has been filed.
Decision of the Mediation Committee[edit]A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate whether this request is to be accepted or rejected. Notes concerning the request and questions to the parties may also be posed by a committee member in this section.
|
Rejected request for mediation concerning Helter Skelter (Manson scenario)
| ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Helter Skelter (Manson scenario)[edit]
Issues to be mediated[edit]The main issue is the page in question is not 100% accurate. An attempt to edit the page to reflect facts not originally included in the original article was blatantly and ignorantly interfered with by "C.Fred and "WikHead." They showed no regard for the views of others in opposition to the original article's content and instead chose to misuse their power by overriding the necessary edits to the page in question.the case talk page.
Parties' agreement to mediation[edit]All parties please indicate below whether they agree to mediation of this dispute; remember to sign your post. Extended comments should be made on the case talk page. Every party listed above will be automatically notified that this request has been filed.
Decision of the Mediation Committee[edit]A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate whether this request is to be accepted or rejected. Notes concerning the request and questions to the parties may also be posed by a committee member in this section.
|
Rejected request for mediation concerning Global Warming Controversy
| ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Global Warming Controversy[edit]
Issues to be mediated[edit]All aspects of article content over which there is disagreement should be listed here. The filing party should define the scope under "Primary issues", which is used to frame the case; other parties to the dispute can list other issues under "Additional issues", and can contest the primary issues on the case talk page.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jdey123 (talk • contribs) 19:28, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
Parties' agreement to mediation[edit]All parties please indicate below whether they agree to mediation of this dispute; remember to sign your post. Extended comments should be made on the case talk page. Every party listed above will be automatically notified that this request has been filed.
Decision of the Mediation Committee[edit]A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate whether this request is to be accepted or rejected. Notes concerning the request and questions to the parties may also be posed by a committee member in this section.
|
Rejected request for mediation concerning Nambudripad Allergy Elimination Technique
| ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nambudripad Allergy Elimination Technique[edit]
I'm confused. Why are two non-existent articles listed here? Famousdog (talk) 11:51, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
Issues to be mediated[edit]All aspects of article content over which there is disagreement should be listed here. The filing party should define the scope under "Primary issues", which is used to frame the case; other parties to the dispute can list other issues under "Additional issues", and can contest the primary issues on the case talk page.
Parties' agreement to mediation[edit]All parties please indicate below whether they agree to mediation of this dispute; remember to sign your post. Extended comments should be made on the case talk page. Every party listed above will be automatically notified that this request has been filed.
Decision of the Mediation Committee[edit]A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate whether this request is to be accepted or rejected. Notes concerning the request and questions to the parties may also be posed by a committee member in this section.
Question - you left other attempts at dispute resolution as blank. Has there been anything done to resolve the dispute other than discussion on the talk page? WP:RSN or WP:RFC perhaps? Please respond in your own sections and not this one, this is for committee member use only. For the committee, WGFinley (talk) 06:28, 7 February 2012 (UTC).
|
Rejected request for mediation concerning User talk:Liamfoley
| ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
User talk:Liamfoley[edit]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Liamfoley#Conflict_of_interest_regarding_abortion
Issues to be mediated[edit]All aspects of article content over which there is disagreement should be listed here. The filing party should define the scope under "Primary issues", which is used to frame the case; other parties to the dispute can list other issues under "Additional issues", and can contest the primary issues on the case talk page.
I've been accused of being an activist which I deny. The other party has no evidence that I am an office holder, draw a salary or is even a member of any organization.
The other editor has attempted to "out" me, mentioning non Wikipedia sites. I regard this as sinister and intimidatory. This puts me at risk of online bullying. I understand that this kind of behaviour is par for the course in many online discussion boards but it's clearly not what I expected from Wikipedia.
Parties' agreement to mediation[edit]All parties please indicate below whether they agree to mediation of this dispute; remember to sign your post. Extended comments should be made on the case talk page. Every party listed above will be automatically notified that this request has been filed.
Decision of the Mediation Committee[edit]A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate whether this request is to be accepted or rejected. Notes concerning the request and questions to the parties may also be posed by a committee member in this section.
|
Rejected request for mediation concerning 1st Independent Spirit Awards
| ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st Independent Spirit Awards[edit]
Issues to be mediated[edit]
Parties' agreement to mediation[edit]All parties please indicate below whether they agree to mediation of this dispute; remember to sign your post. Extended comments should be made on the case talk page. Every party listed above will be automatically notified that this request has been filed.
Decision of the Mediation Committee[edit]A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate whether this request is to be accepted or rejected. Notes concerning the request and questions to the parties may also be posed by a committee member in this section.
|
Rejected request for mediation concerning Digital Extremes
| ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Digital Extremes[edit]
Digital_Extremes#Employment_Environment_.26_Awards (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Issues to be mediated[edit]All aspects of article content over which there is disagreement should be listed here. The filing party should define the scope under "Primary issues", which is used to frame the case; other parties to the dispute can list other issues under "Additional issues", and can contest the primary issues on the case talk page.
Parties' agreement to mediation[edit]All parties please indicate below whether they agree to mediation of this dispute; remember to sign your post. Extended comments should be made on the case talk page. Every party listed above will be automatically notified that this request has been filed.
Decision of the Mediation Committee[edit]A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate whether this request is to be accepted or rejected. Notes concerning the request and questions to the parties may also be posed by a committee member in this section.
|
Rejected request for mediation concerning Vic Toews
| ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vic Toews[edit]
Issues to be mediated[edit]All aspects of article content over which there is disagreement should be listed here. The filing party should define the scope under "Primary issues", which is used to frame the case; other parties to the dispute can list other issues under "Additional issues", and can contest the primary issues on the case talk page.
Parties' agreement to mediation[edit]All parties please indicate below whether they agree to mediation of this dispute; remember to sign your post. Extended comments should be made on the case talk page. Every party listed above will be automatically notified that this request has been filed.
Decision of the Mediation Committee[edit]A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate whether this request is to be accepted or rejected. Notes concerning the request and questions to the parties may also be posed by a committee member in this section.
|
Rejected request for mediation concerning August Burns Red
| ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
August Burns Red[edit]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Gunmetal_Angel/Archive_7#Bells_Associated_act Issues to be mediated[edit]All aspects of article content over which there is disagreement should be listed here. The filing party should define the scope under "Primary issues", which is used to frame the case; other parties to the dispute can list other issues under "Additional issues", and can contest the primary issues on the case talk page.
Parties' agreement to mediation[edit]All parties please indicate below whether they agree to mediation of this dispute; remember to sign your post. Extended comments should be made on the case talk page. Every party listed above will be automatically notified that this request has been filed.
Decision of the Mediation Committee[edit]A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate whether this request is to be accepted or rejected. Notes concerning the request and questions to the parties may also be posed by a committee member in this section.
|
Rejected request for mediation concerning Critical Race Theory
| ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Critical Race Theory[edit]
See the Talk Page of Critical Race Theory Issues to be mediated[edit]All aspects of article content over which there is disagreement should be listed here. The filing party should define the scope under "Primary issues", which is used to frame the case; other parties to the dispute can list other issues under "Additional issues", and can contest the primary issues on the case talk page.
Parties' agreement to mediation[edit]All parties please indicate below whether they agree to mediation of this dispute; remember to sign your post. Extended comments should be made on the case talk page. Every party listed above will be automatically notified that this request has been filed.
Decision of the Mediation Committee[edit]A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate whether this request is to be accepted or rejected. Notes concerning the request and questions to the parties may also be posed by a committee member in this section.
|
Rejected request for mediation concerning Religion in Africa
| ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Religion in Africa[edit]
Issues to be mediated[edit]All aspects of article content over which there is disagreement should be listed here. The filing party should define the scope under "Primary issues", which is used to frame the case; other parties to the dispute can list other issues under "Additional issues", and can contest the primary issues on the case talk page.
Parties' agreement to mediation[edit]All parties please indicate below whether they agree to mediation of this dispute; remember to sign your post. Extended comments should be made on the case talk page. Every party listed above will be automatically notified that this request has been filed.
Decision of the Mediation Committee[edit]A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate whether this request is to be accepted or rejected. Notes concerning the request and questions to the parties may also be posed by a committee member in this section.
|
Rejected request for mediation concerning Extrinsic extensor muscles of the hand
| ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Extrinsic extensor muscles of the hand[edit]
Issues to be mediated[edit]All aspects of article content over which there is disagreement should be listed here. The filing party should define the scope under "Primary issues", which is used to frame the case; other parties to the dispute can list other issues under "Additional issues", and can contest the primary issues on the case talk page.
Parties' agreement to mediation[edit]All parties please indicate below whether they agree to mediation of this dispute; remember to sign your post. Extended comments should be made on the case talk page. Every party listed above will be automatically notified that this request has been filed.
Decision of the Mediation Committee[edit]A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate whether this request is to be accepted or rejected. Notes concerning the request and questions to the parties may also be posed by a committee member in this section.
|
Rejected request for mediation concerning Marek Edelman
| ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Marek Edelman[edit]
Issues to be mediated[edit]All aspects of article content over which there is disagreement should be listed here. The filing party should define the scope under "Primary issues", which is used to frame the case; other parties to the dispute can list other issues under "Additional issues", and can contest the primary issues on the case talk page.
Parties' agreement to mediation[edit]All parties please indicate below whether they agree to mediation of this dispute; remember to sign your post. Extended comments should be made on the case talk page. Every party listed above will be automatically notified that this request has been filed.
Decision of the Mediation Committee[edit]A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate whether this request is to be accepted or rejected. Notes concerning the request and questions to the parties may also be posed by a committee member in this section.
|
Rejected request for mediation concerning Money order
| ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
money orders[edit]
Issues to be mediated[edit]All parties please indicate below whether they agree to mediation of this dispute; remember to sign your post. Extended comments should be made on the case talk page. Every party listed above will be automatically notified that this request has been filed.
Parties' agreement to mediation[edit]All parties please indicate below whether they agree to mediation of this dispute; remember to sign your post. Extended comments should be made on the case talk page. Every party listed above will be automatically notified that this request has been filed.
Decision of the Mediation Committee[edit]A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate whether this request is to be accepted or rejected. Notes concerning the request and questions to the parties may also be posed by a committee member in this section.
|
Rejected request for mediation concerning Paul Gogarty
| ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Paul Gogarty[edit]
Have attempted to highlight lack of balance in article but parties have refused to engage in substance of text because they correctly maintain I have a personal interest. Personal interest or not is irrelevant if the substance is factually correct. What is relevant is whether some of the text in question should be included at all, and, if it is, given that this is a piece about a former elected representative, whether it should be balanced by examples of positive, negative and neutral media coverage, assuming such exists. Issues to be mediated[edit]All aspects of article content over which there is disagreement should be listed here. The filing party should define the scope under "Primary issues", which is used to frame the case; other parties to the dispute can list other issues under "Additional issues", and can contest the primary issues on the case talk page.
Parties' agreement to mediation[edit]All parties please indicate below whether they agree to mediation of this dispute; remember to sign your post. Extended comments should be made on the case talk page. Every party listed above will be automatically notified that this request has been filed.
Decision of the Mediation Committee[edit]A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate whether this request is to be accepted or rejected. Notes concerning the request and questions to the parties may also be posed by a committee member in this section.
|
Rejected request for mediation concerning Sri Lanka
| ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sri Lanka[edit]
Issues to be mediated[edit]All aspects of article content over which there is disagreement should be listed here. The filing party should define the scope under "Primary issues", which is used to frame the case; other parties to the dispute can list other issues under "Additional issues", and can contest the primary issues on the case talk page.
Parties' agreement to mediation[edit]All parties please indicate below whether they agree to mediation of this dispute; remember to sign your post. Extended comments should be made on the case talk page. Every party listed above will be automatically notified that this request has been filed.
Decision of the Mediation Committee[edit]A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate whether this request is to be accepted or rejected. Notes concerning the request and questions to the parties may also be posed by a committee member in this section.
|
Rejected request for mediation concerning Template:Music of Canada
| ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Template:Music of Canada[edit]
Issues to be mediated[edit]All aspects of article content over which there is disagreement should be listed here. The filing party should define the scope under "Primary issues", which is used to frame the case; other parties to the dispute can list other issues under "Additional issues", and can contest the primary issues on the case talk page.
Parties' agreement to mediation[edit]All parties please indicate below whether they agree to mediation of this dispute; remember to sign your post. Extended comments should be made on the case talk page. Every party listed above will be automatically notified that this request has been filed.
Decision of the Mediation Committee[edit]A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate whether this request is to be accepted or rejected. Notes concerning the request and questions to the parties may also be posed by a committee member in this section.
|
Rejected request for mediation concerning Firefox
| ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Firefox[edit]
Issues to be mediated[edit]All aspects of article content over which there is disagreement should be listed here. The filing party should define the scope under "Primary issues", which is used to frame the case; other parties to the dispute can list other issues under "Additional issues", and can contest the primary issues on the case talk page.
Parties' agreement to mediation[edit]All parties please indicate below whether they agree to mediation of this dispute; remember to sign your post. Extended comments should be made on the case talk page. Every party listed above will be automatically notified that this request has been filed.
Decision of the Mediation Committee[edit]A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate whether this request is to be accepted or rejected. Notes concerning the request and questions to the parties may also be posed by a committee member in this section.
|
Rejected request for mediation concerning Shiatsu
| ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shiatsu[edit]
Issues to be mediated[edit]All aspects of article content over which there is disagreement should be listed here. The filing party should define the scope under "Primary issues", which is used to frame the case; other parties to the dispute can list other issues under "Additional issues", and can contest the primary issues on the case talk page.
I know he is the self-appointed overseer of which sources are reliable for this article, and even which bits of those sources can be used in this case. 09:27, 17 April 2012 (UTC)(Shiatsu talk page), however I think he is going a bit far when he uses the page of a currency exchange company for shiatsu on horses (http://www.equineshiatsuassociation.com/) (not even a picture of a horse). He added that page on 12:54, 19 April 2012 (UTC)(Shiatsu talk page). He also places a complete confidence on a source "Ernst & Singh (2008). Trick or Treatment? Alternative Medicine on Trial. p. 326." which doesn't cite one single source or reference for its claims. Now, I wonder how this book, without one single source or reference, is more reliable than a study which he considers very small and subjective 18:06, 28 April 2012 (UTC) (Shiatsu talk page)
Parties' agreement to mediation[edit]All parties please indicate below whether they agree to mediation of this dispute; remember to sign your post. Extended comments should be made on the case talk page. Every party listed above will be automatically notified that this request has been filed.
Decision of the Mediation Committee[edit]A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate whether this request is to be accepted or rejected. Notes concerning the request and questions to the parties may also be posed by a committee member in this section.
|
Rejected request for mediation concerning SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION
| ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION[edit]
Issues to be mediated[edit]All aspects of article content over which there is disagreement should be listed here. The filing party should define the scope under "Primary issues", which is used to frame the case; other parties to the dispute can list other issues under "Additional issues", and can contest the primary issues on the case talk page.
Parties' agreement to mediation[edit]All parties please indicate below whether they agree to mediation of this dispute; remember to sign your post. Extended comments should be made on the case talk page. Every party listed above will be automatically notified that this request has been filed.
Decision of the Mediation Committee[edit]A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate whether this request is to be accepted or rejected. Notes concerning the request and questions to the parties may also be posed by a committee member in this section.
|
Rejected request for mediation concerning Falkland Islands
| ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Falkland Islands[edit]
Issues to be mediated[edit]I made a suggestion regarding Falkland_Islands on the Falkland Islands Talk Page. I believe that it was a valid one. There is a dispute between UK and Argentina regarding the sovereignty of the Falkland Islands. I suggest that Falkland_Islands could be improved by including the reason(s) that the dispute persists. If the explanation is too lengthy, maybe it should be moved to Falkland_Islands_sovereignty_dispute . I don't understand how/why the article shouldn't include a section regarding the reasons that the dispute persists. Nor do I understand the resistance to such a suggestion. Editors stated "Not a Forum" and "Not News." I don't think either applies to my suggestion.
Parties' agreement to mediation[edit]All parties please indicate below whether they agree to mediation of this dispute; remember to sign your post. Extended comments should be made on the case talk page. Every party listed above will be automatically notified that this request has been filed.
Decision of the Mediation Committee[edit]A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate whether this request is to be accepted or rejected. Notes concerning the request and questions to the parties may also be posed by a committee member in this section.
|
Rejected request for mediation concerning Georgian Orthodox Church
| ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Georgian Orthodox Church[edit]
Issues to be mediated[edit]All aspects of article content over which there is disagreement should be listed here. The filing party should define the scope under "Primary issues", which is used to frame the case; other parties to the dispute can list other issues under "Additional issues", and can contest the primary issues on the case talk page.
Parties' agreement to mediation[edit]All parties please indicate below whether they agree to mediation of this dispute; remember to sign your post. Extended comments should be made on the case talk page. Every party listed above will be automatically notified that this request has been filed.
Decision of the Mediation Committee[edit]A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate whether this request is to be accepted or rejected. Notes concerning the request and questions to the parties may also be posed by a committee member in this section.
|
Rejected request for mediation concerning Bruce Clark (legal scholar)
| ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bruce Clark (legal scholar)[edit]
Issues to be mediated[edit]SarahStierch reasons for judgment: "This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner." Primary issue #1: the case talk page.
--Evarose3 (talk) 13:14, 16 May 2012 (UTC) Parties' agreement to mediation[edit]All parties please indicate below whether they agree to mediation of this dispute; remember to sign your post. Extended comments should be made on the case talk page. Every party listed above will be automatically notified that this request has been filed.
Decision of the Mediation Committee[edit]A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate whether this request is to be accepted or rejected. Notes concerning the request and questions to the parties may also be posed by a committee member in this section.
|
Rejected request for mediation concerning Iyengar
| ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Iyengar[edit]
Issues to be mediated[edit]All aspects of article content over which there is disagreement should be listed here. The filing party should define the scope under "Primary issues", which is used to frame the case; other parties to the dispute can list other issues under "Additional issues", and can contest the primary issues on the case talk page.
Explained in detail under the title For Dispute Mediation
Parties' agreement to mediation[edit]All parties please indicate below whether they agree to mediation of this dispute; remember to sign your post. Extended comments should be made on the case talk page. Every party listed above will be automatically notified that this request has been filed.
Decision of the Mediation Committee[edit]A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate whether this request is to be accepted or rejected. Notes concerning the request and questions to the parties may also be posed by a committee member in this section.
|
Rejected request for mediation concerning BERTHE WEILL
| ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BERTHE WEILL[edit]
Issues to be mediated[edit]All aspects of article content over which there is disagreement should be listed here. The filing party should define the scope under "Primary issues", which is used to frame the case; other parties to the dispute can list other issues under "Additional issues", and can contest the primary issues on the case talk page.
Parties' agreement to mediation[edit]All parties please indicate below whether they agree to mediation of this dispute; remember to sign your post. Extended comments should be made on the case talk page. Every party listed above will be automatically notified that this request has been filed.
Decision of the Mediation Committee[edit]A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate whether this request is to be accepted or rejected. Notes concerning the request and questions to the parties may also be posed by a committee member in this section.
|
Rejected request for mediation concerning Psilocybe hoogshagenii
| ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Psilocybe hoogshagenii[edit]
Issues to be mediated[edit]All aspects of article content over which there is disagreement should be listed here. The filing party should define the scope under "Primary issues", which is used to frame the case; other parties to the dispute can list other issues under "Additional issues", and can contest the primary issues on the case talk page.
Parties' agreement to mediation[edit]All parties please indicate below whether they agree to mediation of this dispute; remember to sign your post. Extended comments should be made on the case talk page. Every party listed above will be automatically notified that this request has been filed.
Decision of the Mediation Committee[edit]A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate whether this request is to be accepted or rejected. Notes concerning the request and questions to the parties may also be posed by a committee member in this section.
|
Rejected request for mediation concerning Psilocybe cubensis
| ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Psilocybe cubensis[edit]
Issues to be mediated[edit]All aspects of article content over which there is disagreement should be listed here. The filing party should define the scope under "Primary issues", which is used to frame the case; other parties to the dispute can list other issues under "Additional issues", and can contest the primary issues on the case talk page.
Parties' agreement to mediation[edit]All parties please indicate below whether they agree to mediation of this dispute; remember to sign your post. Extended comments should be made on the case talk page. Every party listed above will be automatically notified that this request has been filed.
Decision of the Mediation Committee[edit]A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate whether this request is to be accepted or rejected. Notes concerning the request and questions to the parties may also be posed by a committee member in this section.
|
Rejected request for mediation concerning Michelle Shocked
| ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Michelle Shocked[edit]
Issues to be mediated[edit]All aspects of article content over which there is disagreement should be listed here. The filing party should define the scope under "Primary issues", which is used to frame the case; other parties to the dispute can list other issues under "Additional issues", and can contest the primary issues on the case talk page.
Parties' agreement to mediation[edit]All parties please indicate below whether they agree to mediation of this dispute; remember to sign your post. Extended comments should be made on the case talk page. Every party listed above will be automatically notified that this request has been filed.
Decision of the Mediation Committee[edit]A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate whether this request is to be accepted or rejected. Notes concerning the request and questions to the parties may also be posed by a committee member in this section.
|
Rejected request for mediation concerning Julian calendar
| ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Julian calendar[edit]
Issues to be mediated[edit]All aspects of article content over which there is disagreement should be listed here. The filing party should define the scope under "Primary issues", which is used to frame the case; other parties to the dispute can list other issues under "Additional issues", and can contest the primary issues on the case talk page.
Parties' agreement to mediation[edit]All parties please indicate below whether they agree to mediation of this dispute; remember to sign your post. Extended comments should be made on the case talk page. Every party listed above will be automatically notified that this request has been filed.
Decision of the Mediation Committee[edit]A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate whether this request is to be accepted or rejected. Notes concerning the request and questions to the parties may also be posed by a committee member in this section.
|
Rejected request for mediation concerning Paris
| ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Paris[edit]
Issues to be mediated[edit]All aspects of article content over which there is disagreement should be listed here. The filing party should define the scope under "Primary issues", which is used to frame the case; other parties to the dispute can list other issues under "Additional issues", and can contest the primary issues on the case talk page.
Parties' agreement to mediation[edit]All parties please indicate below whether they agree to mediation of this dispute; remember to sign your post. Extended comments should be made on the case talk page. Every party listed above will be automatically notified that this request has been filed.
Decision of the Mediation Committee[edit]A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate whether this request is to be accepted or rejected. Notes concerning the request and questions to the parties may also be posed by a committee member in this section.
|
Rejected request for mediation concerning Comfort women
| ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Comfort women[edit]
Issues to be mediated[edit]All aspects of article content over which there is disagreement should be listed here. The filing party should define the scope under "Primary issues", which is used to frame the case; other parties to the dispute can list other issues under "Additional issues", and can contest the primary issues on the case talk page.
Parties' agreement to mediation[edit]All parties please indicate below whether they agree to mediation of this dispute; remember to sign your post. Extended comments should be made on the case talk page. Every party listed above will be automatically notified that this request has been filed.
Response to Mediator: I'm not sure, because I'm not sure what specifically is being requested to be mediated. There have been a number of discussions on the article talk page over the last several months; I didn't think any of them were at some sort of a locked dispute, but, maybe it was one I wasn't following closely. I don't believe anything on the article has been discussed on any noticeboard, but, again, perhaps I'm mistaken. Qwyrxian (talk) 12:10, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
Decision of the Mediation Committee[edit]A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate whether this request is to be accepted or rejected. Notes concerning the request and questions to the parties may also be posed by a committee member in this section.
|
Rejected request for mediation concerning Sator Square
| ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sator Square[edit]
i want to add an external link to my sator square research group but your automated system deletes it because it is on facebook http://www.facebook.com/groups/463929096964050/
i don't know how to get your system to accept my external link to my sator square research group http://www.facebook.com/groups/463929096964050/ Issues to be mediated[edit]All aspects of article content over which there is disagreement should be listed here. The filing party should define the scope under "Primary issues", which is used to frame the case; other parties to the dispute can list other issues under "Additional issues", and can contest the primary issues on the case talk page.
Parties' agreement to mediation[edit]All parties please indicate below whether they agree to mediation of this dispute; remember to sign your post. Extended comments should be made on the case talk page. Every party listed above will be automatically notified that this request has been filed.
Decision of the Mediation Committee[edit]A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate whether this request is to be accepted or rejected. Notes concerning the request and questions to the parties may also be posed by a committee member in this section.
|
Rejected request for mediation concerning Empathetic Logic Analysis
| ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Empathetic Logic Analysis[edit]File:Yes
This request does not use the required format. The filing party will be contacted and asked to properly complete this request. After an appropriate time, if this request does not use the proper format, it will be declined. For assistance in filing the request, please read the guide to formal mediation or contact the Committee. To re-file this request entirely, add ((csd-u1)) to the top of the page; and, when it is deleted, go here.
Message added by AGK [•] 23:21, 2 August 2012 (UTC), on behalf of the Mediation Committee.
Issues to be mediated[edit]All aspects of article content over which there is disagreement should be listed here. The filing party should define the scope under "Primary issues", which is used to frame the case; other parties to the dispute can list other issues under "Additional issues", and can contest the primary issues on |the case talk page.
Parties' agreement to mediation[edit]All parties please indicate below whether they agree to mediation of this dispute; remember to sign your post. Extended comments should be made on |the case talk page. Every party listed above will be automatically notified that this request has been filed.
Decision of the Mediation Committee[edit]A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate whether this request is to be accepted or rejected. Notes concerning the request and questions to the parties may also be posed by a committee member in this section.
|