The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Runebound Shadows of Margath.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Does not appear to be the work of the uploader. Eeekster (talk) 00:52, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Saint georges college logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Appears to be a derivative work. Eeekster (talk) 01:33, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep.-FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:12, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Atila Hejazi.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Poor quality photograph of an athlete, looks like a screenshot from a video. Dubious "own work" claim. Fut.Perf. ☼ 05:45, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A screenshot? Seems fun! look at Metadata, It's an Own Work. Amirreza ^talk 07:44, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Turkey election board protest 19apr11 480.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Press photo sourced to VoA, claimed PD-USGov-VOA, but uploaded without a direct source link. Since not all photos used by VoA are in fact their own original creation, a specific source link is indispensable here. Possibly commercial AP/AFP picture. Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:16, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jozef Bialynia.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Description states that it is from another website, and states the author of the website gives permission for 'Wikipedia to display this image' - but the image is tagged as being GFDL-self. Acather96 (talk) 07:09, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bialyni Cholodecki Book cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Book cover, doubt PD-self claim. Acather96 (talk) 07:11, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:VCGeorgeDareDowell.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Very much doubt a painting of a Victoria Cross recipient who died in 1872 can be licensed under the GFDL. Acather96 (talk) 07:24, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:LOK Avatar.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Some kind of logo, doubt PD-self claim, orphaned. Acather96 (talk) 07:25, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rattana Bundit FC copy.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• While the uploader probably has drawn this himself as he claims, he also says this is the logo of a football team. Therefore, it's an unauthorized derivative work, also orphaned, claimed ((PD-self)). Acather96 (talk) 18:49, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.