The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep; file is tagged as non-free.-FASTILY ^(TALK) 07:56, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:SChiOGriffin.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Source does not contain the image and the image is mostly owned by the organization. Eeekster (talk) 01:53, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 07:07, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The article this is in is a recreation of deleted material. This logo isn't free, isn't used constructively, and in a short period of time, isn't going to be used at all. Sven Manguard Wha? 07:21, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep; file is tagged as non-free.-FASTILY ^(TALK) 07:56, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:SigmaChiOmegaCrest Small.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No evidence of uploader being the copyright owner. Eeekster (talk) 01:54, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In fact this version claims the organization owns the copyright. Eeekster (talk) 02:34, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 07:07, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:SOP still.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The image is taken from "The Hobbit Blog" http://www.thehobbitblog.com/. The uploader asserts they are the copyright holder, but there is no OTRS evidence of this. Thryduulf (talk) 09:08, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Image has been changed and the goalposts have moved - Peripitus (Talk) 11:58, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Javier González Fraga.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• PD tag requires that the image was created at least 25 years ago but the image page states it was made in 1990 -> so it is only PD in 2015 rather than now. Peripitus (Talk) 10:33, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • I added a fair use rationale to the file. Please note that the magazine was from May 1990, but that the photo itself may have been taken earlier (they commonly use file photos). I hope that helps. Sherlock4000 (talk) 14:32, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Then the image would fail WP:NFCC#1 as the subject is still alive and may indeed fail WP:NFCC#2 but without proper image attribution we cannot tell - Peripitus (Talk) 04:16, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • • Unfortunately, the image should be deleted. It is not within the required time period to be free, and it isn't allowed either as a non-free image. But with some luck, someone will get a photo of him during the electoral campaign. Cambalachero (talk) 19:54, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G5 by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:07, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Haleh Sahabi.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• File is used by VOA but not created by them. See commons:Template:PD-USGov-VOA for a warning that is missing here on en.wp, see other uses of the photo like [1], [2], [3], [4]. The same applies to allmost all Farsi VOA photos. That version of VOA news in 99,9% of the images uses agency material and not has own content. Martin H. (talk) 12:37, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Nyttend (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:05, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:ABS-CBN Sky Patrol.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Appears to have been copied from http://www.flickr.com/photos/dkcandia168/2556075684/ ("All Rights Reserved"). Theleftorium ^(talk) 13:33, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mamal Amrikayi.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Iranian film poster from 1975. Tagged ((PD-Iran)), but Iranian law has a 30-years-after-creation rule only for photographs, not for other images. Other images have 30 years p.m.a. No evidence this is the case here. Fut.Perf. ☼ 15:12, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's not right. There's nothing wrong with it's copyright status. Contents in Cinema has 30-years-after-creation rule. حمایت قانون حمایت حقوق مؤلفان و مصنفان و هنرمندان (ماده ۱۶) You can check it with someone can read Persian Language. Amirreza ^talk 08:02, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ilya schor scribe2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• It is unlikely that the artist released this painting under Creative Commons. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 21:34, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep; file is tagged as non-free.-FASTILY ^(TALK) 07:58, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:UPR at Utuado.svg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Claim that the image "consists of typefaces, individual words, slogans, or simple geometric shapes" doesn't appear to be true. Eeekster (talk) 22:58, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 05:05, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.