< July 1 July 3 >

July 2

[edit]

File:Litti at road side.jpg

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:34, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is no description or source, and it is watermarked with a copyright symbol. ZooFari 01:01, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Flug leuc.jpg

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 02:28, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Contains watermark dated prior to upload date, orphaned, possibly in violation of image policy. ZooFari 01:40, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Ixor cocc Fr.jpg

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 02:28, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Contains watermark dated prior to upload date, orphaned, possibly in violation of image policy. ZooFari 01:43, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Litti at road side stall.jpg

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:34, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just a crop of File:Litti at road side.jpg to take out the copyright watermark. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 01:46, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:01dagc.jpg

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 02:28, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is no permission in www.serienjunkies.de for using this image under GFDL. OsamaK 04:26, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:01poum.jpg

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 02:28, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is no permission on z.hubpages.com for using this image under GFDL. OsamaK 04:26, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Jeremy-wariner.jpg

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Feydey (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:36, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Given this user's upload history, unlikely that this image, high quality, low resolution, and framed, is a free image. Mosmof (talk) 05:03, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Major Cineplex.JPG

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 02:28, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This file, along with File:The Mall Ngamwongwan.jpg and File:City Air Terminal.jpg, was submitted to PUF on 6 March, but was kept due to non-overwhelming evidence of copyright violation, as User:Maxl thought that I seemed to be relying on "a lot of superstition". I was away from editing at that time, however, and had not been able to clarify my position, which is that since all but these three of User:Rootje's uploads have been deleted, mostly due to copyright violations, I believe it wise rather than "superstitious" to cease assuming good faith in such cases. Few users would use a different camera for every shot they upload, and the fact that Rootje has never responded to a talk page inquiry isn't helping his case. Since then, File:The Mall Ngamwongwan.jpg has been confirmed to be a copyright violation and deleted, and I believe the same to be the nature of the other two remaining files. Although this has still yet to be proved beyond all doubt, I believe that given the user's contributions and the inconsistent nature of these uploads, erring on the side of caution would be preferable. Paul_012 (talk) 05:57, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:City Air Terminal.jpg

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 02:28, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This file, along with File:Major Cineplex.JPG and File:The Mall Ngamwongwan.jpg, was submitted to PUF on 6 March, but was kept due to non-overwhelming evidence of copyright violation, as User:Maxl thought that I seemed to be relying on "a lot of superstition". I was away from editing at that time, however, and had not been able to clarify my position, which is that since all but these three of User:Rootje's uploads have been deleted, mostly due to copyright violations, I believe it wise rather than "superstitious" to cease assuming good faith in such cases. Few users would use a different camera for every shot they upload, and the fact that Rootje has never responded to a talk page inquiry isn't helping his case. Since then, File:The Mall Ngamwongwan.jpg has been confirmed to be a copyright violation and deleted, and I believe the same to be the nature of the other two remaining files. Although this has still yet to be proved beyond all doubt, I believe that given the user's contributions and the inconsistent nature of these uploads, erring on the side of caution would be preferable. Paul_012 (talk) 05:58, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Sarah Michelle G.jpg

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 02:28, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File originally upl aded to Wikimedia Commons [1] where it has now been deleted as copyvio Garda40 (talk) 06:29, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Clc-1 clear.jpg

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 02:28, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The file itself is probably justified under fair use, but the picture cannot possibly be GFDL as it probably belongs to the Chinese government. Prefer fixing up the source/copyright/attribution but I have no idea how to do this for PRC images. RabidDeity (talk) 07:20, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Yоung Shop couple.jpg

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 02:28, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image's source text isn't English, but the only indicated date is 1977, which doesn't support the PD-old tag. (ESkog)(Talk) 07:37, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:MichelleWilliams.jpg

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 02:28, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like a TV screen capture - makes it a derivative work that is not free Peripitus (Talk) 10:25, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Mtvredcarpet.jpg

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 02:28, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image appears watermarked which indicates it's taken from a website with one of those (c) notices....not a public domain image Peripitus (Talk) 10:26, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Brshetty.jpg

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:36, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Web resolution, posed. I suspect this image was taken from elsewhere. J Milburn (talk) 10:44, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Kanpur central.jpg

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:36, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The in-image credits do not seem consistent with a PD claim. J Milburn (talk) 11:48, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:1203231390268647 file.jpg

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:35, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

MaenK.A.Talk 15:11, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Azad indi Brk4.jpg

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 02:28, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Watermarked with date prior to upload date, orphan, other images by this user have been deleted. ZooFari 16:37, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Cryptolepis buchanani.jpg

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 02:28, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Contains watermark dated prior to upload date, possibly in violation of image policy ZooFari 16:42, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Hemidesmus indica.jpg

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 02:28, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Contains watermark dated prior to upload date, orphan, possibly in violation of image policy ZooFari 16:56, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Gas2gif.jpg

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT⚡ 17:38, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

take from http://phacedesigns.web.officelive.com/default.aspx Triwbe (talk) 17:36, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Retief Goosen 2004 U.S. Open.jpg

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by J Milburn (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:10, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader claims "own work" with multiple author names, and has changed images uploaded as from another website to "own work" when challenged. This is a low resolution image that looks like a press shot; I doubt the uploader owns the rights to it. J Milburn (talk) 21:57, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:Mo Kyung--Joong.jpg

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by J Milburn (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:10, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader claims "own work" with multiple author names, and has changed images uploaded as from another website to "own work" when challenged. This is a low resolution image that looks like a press shot; I doubt the uploader owns the rights to it. J Milburn (talk) 21:57, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


File:FSAV.jpg

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G4 by IronGargoyle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:55, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Contains logos. Orphaned. Dubious encyclopedic use. RabidDeity (talk) 22:58, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
More