The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:45, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image is on flickr (here) noting "all rights reserved" and with an upload date pre-dating this one images by four months. Also present on this blog with a date a few days prior to the flickr one. Either the flickr user and the uploader are the same person, or this image is not verifyably free Peripitus (Talk) 02:24, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:45, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image is a duplicate of an all-rights-reserved one on flickr. The flickr image pre-dates this one by four months so unless the flickr user and the uploader of this image are the same person, it is not a free image Peripitus (Talk) 02:26, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nja247 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:51, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Taken from here and not own work Srikanth (speak) 07:14, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nja247 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:51, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

taken from here and not own work Srikanth (speak) 07:16, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Garion96 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:11, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to contain a presumably copyrighted logo/insignia. J Milburn (talk) 10:55, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image is free. Pattern on the jumper is not a logo, and never was one. I drew the image myself in FireworksNimChief (talk) 15:20, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• If the design is not the logo of the club, then it's inappropriate for an article about the club. --Hammersoft (talk) 19:53, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:45, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly a professional photo, claimed as self-created by someone with a history of copyright violation. TheJazzDalek (talk) 12:20, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:45, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

First edition of this upload has "wikipedia use only". Second mentions a permission e-mail. It would be nice if that e-mail could be forwarded to info-da@wikimedia.org (it is probably in Danish?). User:Nillerdk (talk) 13:33, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete without prejudice to restoring if it can be shown that the image was taken by an army member as part of his official duties. Skier Dude (talk) 02:17, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1944 pic of Albanian refugees. It says "According to Albanian law, images of state authorities, made during communism are public domain", but this isn't an official state work. ((PD-Albania)) says anonymous works are copyrighted 70 years, but that won't be until 2015, I think. – Quadell ^(talk) 16:12, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to me that if it was taken by a member of the army, it would be an image created by a state authority. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:15, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Duplicate listing Skier Dude (talk) 02:15, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
1944 pic of Albanian refugees. It says "According to Albanian law, images of state authorities, made during communism are public domain", but this isn't an official state work. ((PD-Albania)) says anonymous works are copyrighted 70 years, but that won't be until 2015, I think. – Quadell ^(talk) 16:12, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See comment above. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:15, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:45, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Screen capture without permission MBisanz ^talk 21:42, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:45, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free screen capture MBisanz ^talk 21:49, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:45, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Doubt the uploader is the owner of the company that makes the software. MBisanz ^talk 21:57, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:45, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free screenshot MBisanz ^talk 22:04, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by IronGargoyle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:05, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

and File:Season3concertphotoit'sallrighthere.jpg from same flickr account.

A flickr download but it is likely a promotional photo, flickr uploader has no meta data on page. Very unlikely to be a genuinely free image. Polly (Parrot) 22:12, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like screencaps from a music video that was broadcast by Disney. --NrDg 00:15, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:45, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Press release style image found by tineye on a number of Indian websites which credits Y. S. Rajasekhara Reddy's own website www.ysrportal.com but I cannot find the image there. Several other, possibly non-free images of this uploader, have been deleted previously. ww2censor (talk) 22:18, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Keep, permission is good. Stifle (talk) 10:29, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wouldn't the copyright belong to the developer and/or publisher of Rome: Total War rather than the author of the related mod? Rockfang (talk) 22:44, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I would presume the developers know what they are talking about, although I can't see the OTRS ticket queue this is in. IronGargoyle (talk) 23:44, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:45, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This image, though I cannot find its source on the internet, appears to be an official headshot scaled to webresolution and not the property of the uploader to release into the public domain. The edges as well show that the image has been scaled up before uploading here. Peripitus (Talk) 23:06, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:16, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The image claims both that the uploader owns the image and that the author is "anonymous". This image appears to be a professionally produced taken from a press website, I can see press images of the same event that seem taken from the same angle but cannot find this particular image. No exif an web resolution are just additional hints. Peripitus (Talk) 23:14, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Delete. The image is clearly not self-made, therefore it has an invalid source. If a valid source is provided, it can be undeleted, assuming copyright checks out. Stifle (talk) 10:31, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Submitter claims the image was "self-made", yet the photo was taken in 1936. Call me crazy, but I'm a bit skeptical. RabidDeity (talk) 23:30, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - The image has a public domain license and a GNU FDL one as well. I don't think it can be both.--Rockfang (talk) 23:46, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is in the public domain, per ((PD-Iraq)). IronGargoyle (talk) 02:05, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure? We don't even know who took the photo, so how do we know that person died 50 years ago? --RabidDeity (talk) 02:48, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Non-artistic photograph copyrights expire 5 years after publication. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:01, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The law that states that was enacted in 1971. As a matter of interest I wonder if they was any Iraq copyright law that would cover this 1936 image ? - Peripitus (Talk) 23:38, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's an interesting question, but presumably the 1971 law overruled any law before that. The 2004 declaration was explicitly non-retroactive though. IronGargoyle (talk) 13:36, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.