The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy deleted by Jimfbleak (non-admin closure). -- LuK3 (Talk) 21:09, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sinking ship statement (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Meaningless nonsense with no significance whatsoever. United States Man (talk) 19:10, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete As original research at best. Wish there was a CSD criteria for these. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 19:17, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Agree that an OR CSD cat would be good. Harry the Dog WOOF 19:28, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it sort of aggravated me that I had to go through all of this to get it deleted. United States Man (talk) 20:20, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as original research. The article isn't meaningless nonsense to me, but I don't see any sources that would suggest that the term "sinking ship statement" is used in this context anywhere outside this Wikipedia article. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 20:29, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:NOT#DICDEF. Blue Riband► 20:36, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.