The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Mediran (t • c) 01:17, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This over large article was created because it was thought to be a good idea to have a list of all birds that live in the North American continent. Unfortunately, the article was found to be too long to load in a reasonable time and a means of rectifying the problem was sought. The geographical scope of the article is Mexico, USA and Canada. Each of these countries has a complete list of resident birds, so the information in this list is located elsewhere (albeit lass conveniently). The suggested means of dealing with this list is to split it and therefore there would be no advantage over the lists mentioned above. Therefore, I believe this list should be deleted and the articles on the individual countries relied upon to serve its purpose. Op47 (talk) 23:27, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Merge to team articles.. MBisanz talk 01:51, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
There does not seem to be an NBA Cheerleading League. This is simply a list of NBA cheer squads. The info could be merged into team articles where warranted. Dbrodbeck (talk) 20:22, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) AutomaticStrikeout (T • C) 20:32, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable per WP:BIO. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 22:52, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE The Bushranger One ping only 17:55, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This record label from Denmark appears to fail WP:N and WP:CORPDEPTH. Several searches in GNews archive and Books have only yielded this directory listing in Jazz Times. Northamerica1000(talk) 05:09, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Mediran (t • c) 01:16, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Does not meet GNG. No assertion of notability, no secondary sources. Article even makes it clear that it is simply one of many similar products. MSJapan (talk) 01:16, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to List of Westfield Group shopping centres in Australia. MBisanz talk 01:52, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Declined WP:PROD. The only coverage I found of this shopping centre was from the local newspaper (not an indication of notability per WP:ORG) and other minor, trivial mentions such as winning the lottery ticket. An acceptable source I found was this, although I doubt that's enough to write an article out of. Till 01:22, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:53, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is WP:NOTNEWS. Not every tragic event should have an article. Reywas92Talk 00:46, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:53, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is WP:NOTNEWS. There should not be an article for every tragic incident. Reywas92Talk 01:37, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 17:59, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Only track list, and seems non-notable. Makecat 01:57, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:53, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I do not believe player meets WP:GNG and I'm unable to find evidence he has played for first team in a fully pro leauge. [2] Blethering Scot 21:59, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:53, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Verifiability. See also point 3 of Wikipedia:IINFO#IINFO: "Long and sprawling lists of statistics may be confusing to readers and reduce the readability and neatness of our articles. In addition, articles should contain sufficient explanatory text to put statistics within the article in their proper context for a general reader." See also points #4, #7, #8, #10, and #11 of the WP:LISTCRUFT essay. WCityMike (talk) 21:41, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. I'm going to stub the article back to the version Fadesga (talk · contribs) created, which was referenced and asserted (if weakly) notability. Note that I'm doing that as an editor and not as part of the close. Mackensen (talk) 04:05, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:ANYBIO, no claims to notability other than having a job and being a graduate student. Needs references WP:TOOSOON re articles he has published. MJH (talk) 23:00, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 23:02, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This page has already been deleted once. See here. I don't think anything substantial has occurred since then. Harizotoh9 (talk) 20:50, 22 December 2012 (UTC) (categories)[reply]
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:54, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Article about an artist that relies on routine local coverage (and his Facebook page) to establish notability. Has not released any actual albums, and some of the claims in the bio about collaborations with other artists are unsourced and cannot be verified. I do not believe he meets the notability guidelines for inclusion of performers, or even the basic ones. As is usual in the case of young artists, this might be a case of too soon. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 20:37, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:17, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Not a notable list, and more importantly, it's between the list and the prompt, there is only one line in the entire article that isn't copied material. Possibly could have the top 10 merged if there's a collection of similar lists, but I don't know of one. Sven Manguard Wha? 17:58, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Doolittle Raid. Mackensen (talk) 04:17, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
In a similar manner to the discussion and conclusion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard E. Cole, this biography fails the notability test of WP:SOLDIER. It should be redirected to Doolittle Raid per WP:ONEEVENT, the same result as Richard E. Cole. Binksternet (talk) 20:36, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. No evidence or policy-based argument presented for notability j⚛e deckertalk 07:23, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Does not pass WP:BKCRIT. As a dōjinshi manga, it was just self published, and there are no RS that shows it was especially notable in that field. Existing sources are not RS: just blog or forum pieces. Search of Japanese sources comes up with no RS. (Note that the English title is a bad translation: it should at least be "Defective Girl", though searches for that come up with nothing significant.) Michitaro (talk) 19:39, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:55, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Long list of concert dates and locations over last 33 years lacking inline citations. I checked a few obvious bands/performers (ie, The Beatles, Kylie, etc) and they do not have equivalent chronology pages which makes this seem a clear delete, but am flagging for discussion. Mabalu (talk) 19:20, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Here's a list of the Ramones gigs: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Ramones_concerts Here's a list of the Jedward gigs: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Jedward_concert_tours Here's a list of the Jonas Brothers gigs: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonas_Brothers#Concert_tours Here's a list of the Jessie J gigs: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Jessie_J_concert_tours Here's a list of the The Veronicas gigs: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_The_Veronicas_concert_tours Many more here: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Search&limit=20&offset=20&redirs=0&profile=default&search=list+of+concerts If these artists merit a dedicated page of concert listings, Matt Finish also does. Matt Finish had a longer career than many of these acts and played more gigs to more people. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.169.5.31 (talk) 27 December 2012 (UTC)
The result was Speedy deleted by Jimfbleak (non-admin closure). -- LuK3 (Talk) 21:09, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Meaningless nonsense with no significance whatsoever. United States Man (talk) 19:10, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 18:06, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Recreation of an article previously deleted by PROD. Concern was Articles lacking sufficient context to identify the subject of the article for those who are not familiar with the subject. While this has since been remedied, he still has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning this article fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:04, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. Black Kite (talk) 13:21, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
As presented here this article is pure original research. That needs to change or it needs to go. There is no logical fallacy in that! Fiddle Faddle (talk) 15:14, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. WP:SNOW. The Bushranger One ping only 17:56, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Contested PROD, notice removed without rationale on talk page & witout edit summary. Appears to be an unremarkable aviation incident. TheLongTone (talk) 13:14, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 22:55, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Contains purely redlink. Weihang7 (talk) 13:00, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Mediran (t • c) 01:14, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Indiscriminate list, in that I see -- as a conservative estimate -- 5,000 possible list entries. As the list itself says; "Its alumni hence includes the vast majority of the country's preeminent legal professionals, including academics, supreme court justices, senior civil servants, and a large number of politicians" and businessmen could be added to that. Much better off being categorized, if we diffuse the category "University of Oslo alumni" which has become large. Geschichte (talk) 12:56, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Reverted to transwiki. Note that an article on Iouea the fossil sponge genus would be an entirely valid topic. The Bushranger One ping only 18:10, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unsourced article with no evidence of notability Mikenorton (talk) 23:05, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 22:58, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable village rugby team. Fails the general notability criteria for organisations, and specifically Wikipedia:WikiProject_Rugby_union/Notability. Bob Re-born (talk) 12:36, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 22:53, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
We definately need better sourcing than this to write an article. A trawl through google, Google books and Google News found nothing usable and this has had a month to improve. I think this fails GNG and N so here we are. Spartaz Humbug! 11:24, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. WP:SNOW postdlf (talk) 15:41, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This list can be nothing other than subjective WP:OR. It was PRODded, but deprodded without comment by the original editor. There might be a list of "Events which have been called "a blessing in disguise", with references, but even that would not be a useful contribution to the encyclopedia. PamD 09:21, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Dubstep. J04n(talk page) 17:17, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I have nominated this page for deletion as it is unsourced material which many readers will find controversial. There is a lot of disagreement regarding electronic dance genres, and it is best to wait for the term to become established over time than to create an unprofessional page. If you do manage to find suitable references, it would be a good idea to plan it out before creating a page, to ensure that it is formal and the information included is substantial. Thanks. DJUnBalanced (talk) 20:36, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. Plausibly meets WP:N, balanced-ish headcount. WilyD 12:10, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
There is also a related MFD going on about a draft page. Earlier tonight I speedied this as a G4 recreate of a deleted article, but a user asked that I undelete because they say they made substantial changes. I'm still not seeing a claim to notability, though. The sources used mostly mention Alvey because they're interviewing him about roller coasters or games that the articles are really about (e.g. [7][8][9]). Some of the articles go into more detail about him, e.g. 'here's how he became a roller coaster expert', but I suspect scarcely more than is written in this article can ever be written and referenced. Delete. delldot ∇. 08:23, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Scubasteve442 (talk) 10:20, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
An article from an obscure Australian paper, and mentions in one or two other random stories does not cover "significant coverage." I also do not see a single source from a theme park "periodical." Also, no sources note him working for Activision. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.249.200.232 (talk) 15:43, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Still does not meet notability to be a subject on Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.249.200.232 (talk) 19:17, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. MBisanz talk 01:58, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Notability has not been established. Not nearly enough fights especially in top tier. Peter Rehse (talk) 02:33, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ricci is given good secondary coverage here http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/mma/news/20121213/mike-ricci/, here http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/video/mike-ricci-on-mmajunkiecom-radio/1851158127001 , and here http://ca.news.yahoo.com/montreal-mma-pros-gsp-macdonald-ricci-weigh-fighting-160448560--spt.html
WP:MMANOT says mutliple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. So I think Ricci should stay. I would also like to cite WP:TUF
It says at the top of WP:ATHLETE that exceptions can be made and also mentions using common sense. Why is the bar so low for boxers at WP:NBOX that they only have to appeared on one primetime or PPV Showtime/HBO event? MMA fighters must appear in 3? I think an exception could be made for Ricci because common sense says that he is going to get that third fight scheduled in the near future. Why go through the hassle when you know he is going to get the fight and this is doing to be be brought up again? PortlandOregon97217 (talk) 02:01, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
More recent coverage here — Preceding unsigned comment added by PortlandOregon97217 (talk • contribs) 02:34, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 18:12, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This article fails to meet the criteria for WP:N Transmissionelement (talk) 07:24, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
((Good evening. My name is Kushal Gupta and I have co-founder of tutoringreviews.org. Our non-profit website is a platform for reviews about tutoring and language companies. We are beginning to incorporate our research in the test preparation and language industry by making valid, verifiable updates to wikipedia. We plan, especially, to make changes to the existing Princeton Review page (which is very basic indeed). We will also make draft pages for important companies who are major actors in these industries - including Advantage Testing. Since these companies are major actors in these industries, in the interests of full disclosure and transparency, we feel potential students should know as much as possible about the companys' backgrounds, history, objectives, and so forth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tutoringreviews (talk • contribs) 07:33, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Greetings, This is Kushal Gupta again, editor of tutoringreviews.org. I wanted to explain our perspective on notability of the Jefferson Prep Education institute. They have received significant buzz in the tutoring world because of their free tutoring and SAT programs at inner city schools, and because of their work for rebuilding micro-schools in Haiti. The micro-schools initiative (which I cited in the page) is notable because of the Clinton reconstruction efforts in Port-au-Prince.)) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tutoringreviews (talk • contribs) 07:40, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I feel that this is notable because of the company's presence and leadership in the field of building micro-schools in Haiti with the Clinton reconstruction effort. This has been cited on the page (New York Social Diary fundraiser new article). Citation 4 on page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bluekushalrajdelhi (talk • contribs) 18:47, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 22:54, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This article fails WP:NOR and the inclusion policy as its only two sources does not say nothing about the subject. The majority of the information in the article is similar to List of UFC champions. LlamaAl (talk) 07:14, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Withdrawn by nominator Alan Liefting (talk · contribs). Non-admin closure. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 18:30, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
A short and incomplete list of firearm brands that is better covered by Category:Firearm brands and some actual prose in the firearm article. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 06:44, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 18:20, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable per WP:BIO. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 05:48, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 22:51, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Not a notable organization Flykyrskysong (talk) 13:35, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedily deleted by User:Jimfbleak under criterion G11 with additional comment "Essay, original research, pov". (Non-admin closure) "Pepper" @ 12:23, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Article is about a non-notable local Pride organization and the associated pride week they host. Reads like an advertisement. Mike (talk) 05:29, 22 December 2012 (UTC) Mike (talk) 05:29, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:25, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:ALBUM. I can find no discussion of this compilation album. Seems to be an attempt to host the artist's entire and extensive discography on WP. -MJH (talk) 20:08, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 22:51, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable youth player; references are to local newspapers and a biog. Search engine results bring up coverage that is WP:ROUTINE. This nomination has been made with regard to the guidance at [14]i wintonian talk 02:11, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to Dark Adrenaline. MBisanz talk 01:59, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:NSONG all criteria MJH (talk) 02:18, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Mediran (t • c) 01:15, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
A non-notable list and no other such lists exist (I think the WP:OTHERSTUFF argument is valid in this case). BTW, the ref given is not a reliable source. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 09:20, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Lord Roem's dissent is duly noted, but the consensus appears to be that the news coverage here agrees with SwisterTwister's and Presidentman's view that the coverage is too routine in nature for the subject to merit a biography. Sjakkalle (Check!) 18:30, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:POLITICIAN as subject lost only election entered (back in 2006). Not found to be notable in any other areas. | Uncle Milty | talk | 01:09, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE The Bushranger One ping only 18:22, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
A defunct UK record label that appears to fail WP:N and WP:CORPDEPTH. Searches in GNews archives and Books are only providing passing mentions. Northamerica1000(talk) 03:37, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:28, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This author doesn't meet the notability guidelines, no significant coverage from reliable sources. He gets zero news archive hits. Article also seems designed to promote his website. Morefoolhim 00:54, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Mediran (t • c) 01:11, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Contested PROD. Fails WP:EVENT and Wikipedia is not a news repository. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 02:23, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This event is worldwide in distribution: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2251849/Pennsylvania-church-shooting-leaves-4-dead-2-injured-happened-NRA-press-conference.html?fb_action_ids=505732662780332&fb_action_types=og.likes&fb_source=timeline_og Jogershok (talk) 05:26, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 08:25, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable album, not confirmed, speculative, also see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kidz Bop 27 I don't think we should create heaps of pages in a numbered series, we haven't got anywhere near 28 so this article should be recreated at a later date if and when more is known. Passengerpigeon (talk) 02:04, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. "Merge and delete" is not a possible outcome as it would create WP:COPYVIO. The Bushranger One ping only 18:23, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No indication of notability. Belk was interviewed for the Federal Writers Project; there are no sources about him except the interview itself. The article's other sources don't actually mention Belk and are used to support original synthesis. The article is apparently part of some sort of class project; see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation#Something fishy here... Huon (talk) 01:59, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 08:27, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable album, not confirmed, speculative, also see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kidz Bop 27 Passengerpigeon (talk) 01:59, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 08:24, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This is a future album with no tracks known, fails wp:album as I can find no mention of it. Also, the album is part of a numbered series whose articles could go on for infinity, this article should be left as a redlink and created when the album gains notability and some tracks are known. Passengerpigeon (talk) 01:54, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:30, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable band that fails WP:NBAND. I can't locate any evidence of charting anywhere, major tours or significant third party coverage. So non-notable that Allmusic didn't even do the obligatory one paragraph blurb about them. Niteshift36 (talk) 17:03, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Kubigula (talk) 02:37, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No working references, no claims supporting notability, google search finds nothing except links to his website and blog. Fails WP:ANYBIO Modern.Jewelry.Historian (talk) 00:43, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please check this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Alberto_Sabino Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs) 14:47, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to The Walkabouts. MBisanz talk 02:00, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:NALBUM WP:GNG. References are just listings, not reviews. MJH (talk) 02:21, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 22:51, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unable to find any evidence that the subject meets WP:NFILM. Hut 8.5 11:22, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
ll semi the AFD to stop further socking. Courcelles 01:47, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
In summary, I don't think this film meets the notability criteria at WP:NFILM yet. If it ever does, the article can be re-created (hopefully using a less promotional writing style). --Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:41, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. WP:SNOW, there's no chance this will close with a consensus to delete. j⚛e deckertalk 19:08, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Bond (film character) was prematurely closed in September, when the article was redirected to James Bond (literary character). The same editor who created that redirect has recently recreated the article, thereby circumventing the original TfD, with no deletion review having taken place. The original rationale: "Redundant to James Bond in film", still applies. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 01:16, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:32, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable product. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 09:39, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 22:48, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This heavy metal band from Parsippany, New Jersey appears to fail WP:BAND and WP:N. Source searches, including customized ones such as [16] and [17] just aren't providing any coverage whatsoever. Northamerica1000(talk) 07:48, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:33, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I could not find significant coverage of the company in any reliable secondary sources. Delete per WP:ORG. Odie5533 (talk) 03:20, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 21:10, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:ORG refs are all mentioning that they hired a footballer - trying to inherit notability. MJH (talk) 03:49, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. I'm moving all of these to the instructor's user space. Drmies (talk) 16:38, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
A number of articles have been created recently on participants in the Federal Writers' Project. I do not see how this confers notability, and there is no claim to notability otherwise. StAnselm (talk) 00:37, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I am also nominating
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:34, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:MUSICBIO criteria 1-12, sorry. One of his bands needs to become notable, then he can get a bio in that article. MJH (talk) 23:11, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:35, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable company and Google News provided a minor news article here and press releases here, here and here and a reprint of a press release here. I found a review for one of their games, Strimko, here. A different search provided this which wouldn't be much help. SwisterTwister talk 05:32, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Royal Canadian Air Farce#Discography. The Bushranger One ping only 18:24, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Subject seems to lack notability and is completely unreferenced. The article mostly consists of a track listing with no indication of significance. - MrX 21:56, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to La Corte del Pueblo . MBisanz talk 21:08, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:ANYBIO and WP:GNG Reference is to his law firm bio MJH (talk) 02:40, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for putting more stuff about him. How can I help so the article does not get delete? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.90.218.173 (talk) 06:17, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was a soft No consensus. There was a nomination for deletion and a single editor contesting that proposition; as there were no previously contested PRODs, this is basically the equivalent of a single contested PROD. NPASR. Salvidrim! 09:11, 26 December 2012 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]
WP:TOOSOON a pending video game with no references. Fails WP:GNG MJH (talk) 02:55, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. The Bushranger One ping only 18:26, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Article about what seems to be a minor channel on Indian cable TV. References are mostly primary or seem to be unreliable, and ghits seem to return mostly self-generated content. I am also concerned because the creator Sociosquare (talk · contribs) seems to be an SPA that went through WP:AFC [18] unsuccessfully, so he decided to go ahead and just have a separate account Gauravmendiratta (talk · contribs) create it in articlespace (sock?). I am also nominating Zee Khana Khazana Channel, which was rejected repeatedly from AFC and is essentially the same thing. I believe this is WP:PROMO at best, and the channels simply don't seem to meet WP:GNG at least; with no prejudice to withdrawing the AFD if Indian editors with more knowledge about this can provide substantive sources. §FreeRangeFrog 21:23, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 22:48, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Very heavy COI, perhaps autobiographical. Clearly written to be very flattering to the subject, although doesn't seem to rise to the level of CSD G11. Very much is made of the subjects family connections, but obviously notability is not inherited. Could be notable, but seems rather dubious. If this closes as keep, at the very least the article needs a serious rewrite for POV. Safiel (talk) 04:37, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:38, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This is a non-notable cartoon series in a regional newspaper, there is a dearth of independent reliable sources. Gareth E Kegg (talk) 00:21, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 22:47, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
There is no such thing as a CFL Cheerleading League. This is simply a list of CFL team Cheerleaders and could easily be merged into the respective team articles. Dbrodbeck (talk) 20:04, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. The main issue here is whether the article violates the WP:CRYSTAL policy that prohibits unverifiable speculation on future events and products. I have reviewed the article and the debate and come to that it does. There were a few keep votes after the relisting of the AFD, but the two first don't provide a substantive argument to the main issue (Neither "Looks like an article in its early stage" and "It's a start class article, but that's no reason for it to be deleted." address the issue; the article was not put on AFD because of its lack of development.) The next two keep votes do point to sources that attempt to address the WP:CRYSTAL concerns, but a few lines is not the significant coverage that WP:N asks for. Fleet Command's analysis also shows that much of the sourcing used in the article trying to address some of the concerns is sketchy at best.
Having looked at the article, I also note that some of the inline citations point either directly or indirectly to web forum discussions, something that does not qualify as a reliable source. Kww pointing out "Wikipedia is not a collection of product announcements and rumors." from the CRYSTAL policy and Starblind pointing out that "Rumour-mongering isn't Wikipedia's job" also carries weight here.
I have considered the redirect and merge options that some suggested as an alternative, but with the target articles would contain little if any coverage of this subject matter, so Codename Lisa's concern about sending readers "on a wild goose chase" has merit. Sjakkalle (Check!) 10:34, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This OS name and its release date are not confirmed - it's all speculation at this stage. Jasper Deng (talk) 18:07, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 22:46, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Was dePRODed by creator but still fails to meet criteria. Concern was: 'Fails to meet notability criteria per WP:BAND' . Further searches have failed to reveal more reliable sources in number and scope. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 20:39, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]