The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 07:34, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Machine pistols in fiction (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article reads like original research by synthesis because that is exactly what it is. None of the sources actually discuss the subject specifically. Spartaz ^Humbug! 04:50, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Also, I doubt that it is a thorough treatment of the topic. I think it is just Something That Someone Is Interested In but Does Not Fit In With The Rest Of Wikipedia. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 08:42, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, apart from the sorry state of the current article which fails to address the subject, this would be better covered under a general treatment of "guns in fiction" Not that I can find similar articles. Though I did find Rayguns in fiction which seems to have risen like a zombie from a 2007 AFD. GraemeLeggett (talk) 09:09, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 21:44, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 21:44, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.