![]() |
< 26 October | 28 October > |
---|
The result was speedy delete. Article contains no more evidence of notability than that deleted by Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AbanteCart (capital C in name). — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:06, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:((subst:spa|username)) ; suspected canvassed users: ((subst:canvassed|username)) ; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: ((subst:csm|username)) or ((subst:csp|username)) . |
Non notable open source software failing WP:NOTABILITY. Recreation of the previously AfD deleted spam article AbanteCart, which also been speedily deleted a multitude of times. Has a few links but they seem to be press releases. Seems to be nothing more than Self-promotion and product placement, which wikipedia is WP:NOT. Hu12 (talk) 22:49, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
((cite web))
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher=
(help) that I seen was valued in some other similar article. I hope this helps and apologies, since I am new to wikipedia.— Eccommercewisdom (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. The preceding unsigned comment was added at 14:03, 28 October 2012 (UTC).[reply]The result was delete. MBisanz talk 00:01, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Blatant advertising of a company with no coverage in independent reliable sources, only press releases and routine coverage. Dennis Bratland (talk) 22:40, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 00:01, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No significant coverage of this company; fails WP:CORP. Only coverage is press releases, routine mentions, and directory listings. Games like Rails Across America might be notable, but notability is not inhereited. Dennis Bratland (talk) 22:36, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to June 2011 Peshawar bombings. MBisanz talk 00:03, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Merged this article and Shafiullah Khan with June 2011 Peshawar bombings. A separate bio on each journalist lacks notability and shifts the focus away from the suicide bombing incident. Crtew (talk) 22:23, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to U.S. Route 377 in Texas. None of the keep voters have shown evidence of significant coverage and many are basically admitting that the article is non-notable, but we should keep it indefinitely because the ideal merge target doesn't exist. If List of Texas state highways shorter than one mile is created in the future the history of this article will still be here and it can be merged there too. Jenks24 (talk) 09:03, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:USRD/NT and WP:GNG. The route is 0.209 miles long, and there just isn't a lot that can be said about it that is actually notable. Open to the possibility of merging somewhere else. Rschen7754 22:01, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to School District 53 Okanagan Similkameen. except Osoyoos Secondary School MBisanz talk 00:04, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable school that doesn't pass WP:GNG. No encyclopedic information at all, really. TBrandley 22:00, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reason:
There's also more I'd like to nominate in Category:Elementary schools in British Columbia category as well as other related categories (eg: Category:Elementary schools in Alberta), but there's just too many to list here. Most of them are most likely non-notable, like these, but some may be, I doubt it though, so I also believe most of those, if not all, should be deleted. After all, there was also a Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mountain View Elementary School (Nanaimo) before. TBrandley 22:17, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:19, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Relisting per Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2012 October 19. I abstain. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:58, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
How random is this that this account has only one edit and that too on the article's nomination.
The result was keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:20, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable person who got elected to a position that doesn't grant notability. Drmies (talk) 20:36, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:21, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This article claims some impressive sources: the New York Times, Wired, Scientific American. Unfortunately, none of these sources actually mention Lewis Mitchell. As such, I believe this article fails the general notability guideline as well as the notability guideline for academics. MrOllie (talk) 20:01, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I've added his appointment as the Edward Lorenz Postdoctoral Fellow in the Mathematics of Climate, a prestigious position from the Mathematics Climate Research Network. I believe this qualifies for "2. The person has received a highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level." This can be seen on the sidebar of http://www.mathclimate.org/ under network tab. IheartDA (talk) 20:29, 27 October 2012 (UTC)IheartDA[reply]
So it appears that the criterion for notability are just higher than I thought. Thanks for your time in making sure that all the pages up here are for only the most notable scholars. Cheers IheartDA (talk) 02:40, 28 October 2012 (UTC)IheartDA[reply]
The result was Keep. (non-admin closure) -- Lord Roem (talk) 23:22, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Non-Notable program. Google and Yahoo search no disternable results. TheGoofyGolfer (talk) 19:20, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Kitarō discography. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:22, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
There is no evidence that this album is notable. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/An Ancient Journey. If deleted, there should probably be a redirect to Kitarō discography. Stefan2 (talk) 16:16, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Kitarō discography. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:22, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
There is no evidence that this album is notable. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/An Ancient Journey. If deleted, there should probably be a redirect to Kitarō discography. Stefan2 (talk) 16:16, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:23, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Doesn't establish WP:Notability, links are to youtube and what appears to be a blog. Good faith search did not produce any others. Previous PRODs declined. Kelly Marie 0812 (talk) 15:58, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:31, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
WP:Notability, promotional, unsourced BLP, previous external links were removed for WP:LINKSPAM. Kelly Marie 0812 (talk) 14:47, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:31, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
delete, doesn't appear to be a term in common usage a search does show some but looks to be slang. — Hell In A Bucket (talk) 14:27, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:33, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This is a procedural listing based on a decision at DRV to relist this for further discussion. As the DRV closer I take no position in this debate. Spartaz Humbug! 05:58, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
((cite news))
: |section=
ignored (help)((cite news))
: |section=
ignored (help)((cite news))
: |section=
ignored (help)The result was delete. MBisanz talk 00:15, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The subject of the article does not seem notable. A Google Books search for James Leonard Park shows several books he has written, all of them published by Existential Books, which has not published anything by other authors and does not seem reputable. The article cites a book called Lessons from Sedona, which discusses his work briefly, but it itself is published by iUniverse, a self-publishing company. The article also claims that he teaches at the University of Minnesota, but the university's website lists him as an alumnus. Neil P. Quinn (talk) 18:07, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. — Coffee // have a cup // essay // 19:01, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Previously deleted article, (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darren Kitchen), still fails WP:GNG. Not notable; no reliable sources (and being quoted does not mean "featured," as the article reads.) -- Wikipedical (talk) 01:59, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. — Coffee // have a cup // essay // 19:02, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
According to [[17]]
"If a company is notable, information on its products and services should generally be included in the article on the company itself, unless the company article is so large that this would make the article unwieldy."
Neither Amgen nor Wyeth Pharmaceuticals is large enough that merging this would be problematic.
Specific products should not have stubs created for them.
"Avoid creating multiple stubs about each individual product (PU-36 Explosive Space Modulator, Q-36 Explosive Space Modulator, R-36 Explosive Space Modulator, etc.) especially if there is no realistic hope of expansion." ReformedArsenal (talk) 14:51, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 00:16, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Not notable. No real assertion of notability. One obituary ref establishes that he is the stepson of an actress and the other is a simple directory listing. Velella Velella Talk 14:14, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I closed this, but I missed the fact it had only been relisted today, so I'm going to reopen it - not least because someone else wants to give some input. However, at this time, this could only be closed as "delete", because the fact is that the nomination was on the grounds of notability. Notability is to be seen in lots of secondary, non-trivial, discussions of the subject (see WP:GNG). No one in the debate has indicated any evidence of such to refute the nomination. Uzma Gamal pretty much demolished the sources that have been provided.
If this is to be kept, someone needs to demonstrate that there are multiple sources engaging in non-trivial discussion of him and his roles. Showing he's been mentioned in lots of g-hits etc change nothing.--Scott Mac 17:37, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:35, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Denied prod without explanation. Concern was "Unreferenced article with no evidence of meeting the notability criteria for unreleased films". I echo this concern and having not found any sources, this may be a hoax. BOVINEBOY2008 12:28, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete. WP:CSD#A7 JohnCD (talk) 10:37, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Her death even got some coverage in India, but we can't keep this article as per WP:NOTNEWS. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 08:27, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This should not be deleted. This murder is not the same as most other murders. How often have you heard of a neighbor and family friend kidnap a baby and kill? Among the Indian community in the US, this is a really rare event. An Indian targeting another Indian family friend living in the same apartment complex. The ransom asked for, is also not that high. From how the murderer did this, it is truly weird. Even after accepting his guilt, he asked the cops to inform to the media, that his wife gave them the hint, so that she can collect the $30,000/ reward. I think when more details about the motive would come out when the trials start. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jayaprabhakar (talk • contribs) 09:17, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Miss International. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:37, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
WP:CRYSTALBALL ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 08:20, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Scott Mac 21:37, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable comic series. The references are either unreliable soureces or leave a lot to be desired. There is no specific comic book notability guideline AFAIK so I take my guidance from WP:NBOOK. Contested PROD by an IP. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 07:59, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. — Coffee // have a cup // essay // 18:26, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable as per WP:BIO Rhode Island Red (talk) 15:37, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I think that this would have been a smoother process if there had been more input from other editors. I have never seen an AfD with so few participants. All of our arguing back and forth won’t amount to much if we don’t get more input. However, I think if we did have more eyes, this would be a straightforward delete. With all the scouring for sources and scraping of the bottom of the barrel, you still haven’t managed to put forth anything that convincingly establishes notability.
The 4 sources that you insist meet WP:RS are a mile away IMO. This site[45] looks like nothing more than a repost of Xardel’s resume; it’s not an article on Xardel; it doesn’t involve journalism; there is no evidence of any editorial oversight or fact-checking -- it’s a low quality source. The other 3 sites are no better.[46][47][48]
The other issue here is that the BLPs subject’s personal CV posted at his faculty page at ESSEC does not list him as editor-in-chief, and it can't be simply assumed that the other sources trump Xardel's own CV. And lastly, the journal in question is obscure, low-impact, and long defunct; and I see no examples of anything from the journal itself that indicates that Xardel was ever editor in chief. BTW, this source seems to indicate that Jacques Barraux was EIC of L'Expansion during the time when Xardel was allegedly EIC (i.e., 1987).[49]
So, in summary, there is not sufficient unambiguous evidence that he was editor in chief; the journal itself does not seem to be notable; and even if Xardel was editor in chief and even if the journal were notable, he still wouldn't qualify for a WP page because WP:ACADEMIC states: “"it is possible for an academic to be notable according to this standard, and yet not be an appropriate topic for coverage in Wikipedia because of a lack of reliable, independent sources on the subject". There is a lack of reliable, independent sources on the subject. Anyhow, we've talked this to death already so let's just hope we get some participants or we'll probably have to re-list the AfD nomination. Rhode Island Red (talk) 00:53, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 07:36, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Notability not established with reliable references - does not appear to have fought for any significant titles. Peter Rehse (talk) 06:36, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 07:35, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
On notability grounds - not fought for any top teir organizations. Peter Rehse (talk) 06:27, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Scott Mac 21:34, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The subject of this article whose main claim to notability appears to be by being an author fails the notability requirements of creative professionals found in WP:AUTHOR. The subject appears to have only written three obscure children's books which were published by CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, a self publishing and free distribution service from Amazon. Additionally while she is a business person it doesn't appear as she is notable in this regard either as she has only held middle management roles at Fortune 500 companies with several CTO roles at small non-Fortune 500 companies. Holyfield1998 (talk) 05:55, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Ally Condie#Matched. Michig (talk) 08:05, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
WP:NN novel to be published in the future. Apparently create by a paid editor to promote the novel's author. Article creator now blocked for creation of inappropriate articles (this article not part of blocking rationale). Toddst1 (talk) 05:47, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete per Wikipedia:Csd#G4 'DELETE' Toddst1 (talk) 06:01, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Youtube celebrity who does not appear to have garnered the appropriate level of reliable sourcing in independent sources that is required for a wikipedia article. Google is full of her social media and non reliable sources. Google news is just mentions of her performing in other events (i.e. listings). Unless the sourcing is dramatically improved we need to remove this article. Spartaz Humbug! 04:54, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 07:34, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Article reads like original research by synthesis because that is exactly what it is. None of the sources actually discuss the subject specifically. Spartaz Humbug! 04:50, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Jenks24 (talk) 07:33, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable comic series. While it is referenced I feel that it is of insufficient notability for WP. There is no specific comic book notability guideline AFAIK so I take my guidance from WP:NBOOK. Contested PROD (by article author). -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 04:45, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 07:32, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable radio writer. Fails WP:RADIO. Has NPOV issues. Article appears to be a memorial using unreliable sources posted on Flickr that include scanned personal documents (letter, marriage and birth certificates, etc.): Jane Speed, Writer: From Page to Stage to Screen... to Page Just one short newspaper article source that dates back to 1946. AuthorAuthor (talk) 04:30, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 00:17, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Per Holistic Design's AfD, notability was not established in the company's listed games. notability is not established. PROD removed. czar · · 02:22, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm the original author of the article. For what it's worth, I wrote it because this is a game I used to be very fond of, and the middle version had a nominal connection to a famous historical figure. Also Talonsoft considered it worthwhile to write a sequel to the game in 2001. Peyre (talk) 18:13, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 07:29, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No reliable sources found discussing this individual significantly. Doesn't seem to be notable enough to justify an article. SMS Talk 20:00, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 07:28, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable musician. I found no reliable sources, and the only sources in the articles are Facebook and YouTube pages. David1217 What I've done 02:24, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Also Ne Marteros, a song by this musician. David1217 What I've done 02:25, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Moved from the talk page
thanks my dear but what i have to do ?? I have an article "an interview with an Egyptian E-newspaper" but there is a problem, this article wrote in Arabic!!
this article is used as a reference in Arabic Wikipedia you can tell me the steps that I have to do because I read Wikipedia steps for publishing a Biography, but I fell disorientation !!
this Musician is really in our Country !! If I want to write anything about him or about his Musical Project "Ne Marteros" It's just for history !!!
if you find something is wrong you can delete it but, if you think that there something I can do to improve, tell me please !!
thanks --Egyptian Pharoh (talk) 19:30, 27 October 2012 (UTC)Egyptian Pharoh[reply]
The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 07:27, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to Brenda Howard. Jenks24 (talk) 07:25, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - There are no sources that indicate that this award is in any way notable. The award is already covered at Brenda Howard. Buck Winston (talk) 00:45, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]