The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 18:12, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jefferson Prep Education (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article fails to meet the criteria for WP:N Transmissionelement (talk) 07:24, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

((Good evening. My name is Kushal Gupta and I have co-founder of tutoringreviews.org. Our non-profit website is a platform for reviews about tutoring and language companies. We are beginning to incorporate our research in the test preparation and language industry by making valid, verifiable updates to wikipedia. We plan, especially, to make changes to the existing Princeton Review page (which is very basic indeed). We will also make draft pages for important companies who are major actors in these industries - including Advantage Testing. Since these companies are major actors in these industries, in the interests of full disclosure and transparency, we feel potential students should know as much as possible about the companys' backgrounds, history, objectives, and so forth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tutoringreviews (talk • contribs) 07:33, 22 December 2012‎ (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, This is Kushal Gupta again, editor of tutoringreviews.org. I wanted to explain our perspective on notability of the Jefferson Prep Education institute. They have received significant buzz in the tutoring world because of their free tutoring and SAT programs at inner city schools, and because of their work for rebuilding micro-schools in Haiti. The micro-schools initiative (which I cited in the page) is notable because of the Clinton reconstruction efforts in Port-au-Prince.)) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tutoringreviews (talk • contribs) 07:40, 22 December 2012‎ (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Not notable. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 13:01, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:30, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:30, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as lacking sources sufficient to establish notability. ElKevbo (talk) 17:56, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I feel that this is notable because of the company's presence and leadership in the field of building micro-schools in Haiti with the Clinton reconstruction effort. This has been cited on the page (New York Social Diary fundraiser new article). Citation 4 on page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bluekushalrajdelhi (talk • contribs) 18:47, 22 December 2012‎ (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.