The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. The proposal to rename the article List of large dogs has supporters and should be further discussed on the article's talk page. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 20:03, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Giant dog breed (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG and the only sourced section fails NOTADVICE. Only one of the sources cited could be considered reliable (Mehus-Roe, Kristin (2005). "The Dog For You". The Original Dog Bible. BowTie Press. pp. 62–63. ISBN 1-931993-34-3.) and it gives little explanation of this supposed grouping, just some pros and cons of owning a big dog, the remaining sources are far from RS and of these, only the dod food company mentions “giant breeds”. A Google search revealed nothing attributable. Cavalryman (talk) 20:07, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:09, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 02:15, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 02:15, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 02:15, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Closing this as delete would certainly be justifiable, but I'm not convinced we really have a meeting of minds. So, I'm going to go a bit out on a limb and see if another week of discussion will bring a more clear consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 00:44, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I was tempted to close this as "keep", but since the previous relist was tending towards "delete", I think it's worth listing this one final time.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 23:07, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It is worth mentioning that only once in the above collection of quotes is the term “giant dog breeds” mentioned, if anything that shows the lack of notability for this as a topic. Cavalryman (talk) 12:13, 16 February 2020 (UTC).[reply]
That's only true if you ignore all the quotes that use the terms "giant breed" and "giant breeds of dogs", clear synonyms for "giant dog breeds". Pburka (talk) 23:19, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.