The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kafziel ^{Complaint Department} 06:14, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GSnap[edit]

GSnap (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Freeware knockoff software package which fails the relevant notability guidelines, lacks non-trivial coverage by third party pubs. JBsupreme (talk) 23:55, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. No secondary sources cited; seems like just a way to get some word about a product. Fails WP:RS, WP:N. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 00:45, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Delete - Fails WP:RS & WP:N but there are a lot of ghits. My major concern is that the article doesn't assert or explain notability. Faradayplank (talk) 06:17, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Does not establish notability. Green caterpillar (talk) 13:11, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.