The result of the debate was no concensus --Ichiro 07:04, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
moved to Pedophilia advocacy on the basis of consensus forming here. AfD template still directs here -- not trying to circumvent process. James James 10:02, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or merge with pedophilia. Neologism. Euphemism for pedophilia coined by Lindsay Ashford. Google shows virtually all the hits for "childlove" are from dupes of the wikipedia article and from Lindsay Ashford's puellula.org website. The article is inherently POV, and largely written by Ashford (who is on wikipedia as User:Zanthalon). The title is non-neutral as it is a euphemism. Homey 19:30, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
// paroxysm (n)
21:18, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]// paroxysm (n)
21:18, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]// paroxysm (n)
21:12, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]// paroxysm (n)
21:17, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]// paroxysm (n)
21:05, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
//paroxysm (n)
21:36, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
// paroxysm (n)
05:25, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]// paroxysm (n)
18:43, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]// paroxysm (n)
20:01, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]Keep. I will give an example: In democtatic contries one can find Nazi and Communsit parties. The reasons for they existance are many, including the right of political freedom and the fact that these parties are indicators of the general political state in a given country (i.e. if their popularity start going up, it means that the mainstream politicians do something wrong). A similar argument can be put in the present case. First, if there are peple paying attention to the childlove movement, it is an indicator that it has a political basis, regardless how small it can be. Second, if the arguments of the "movement" are weak, then it will be easy for everyone to refute them again and again. -User:Nllsq (moved from talk page. first edit)
There is another one that advocates sex between women and young girls. --Gbleem 08:40, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
// paroxysm (n)
19:26, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]// paroxysm (n)
02:38, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]// paroxysm (n)
02:51, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Per some of the above arguments, changing my vote from Jesus H. Christ to O... M... G!!!!
Carry on! Herostratus 06:23, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]