The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. --Eptalon (talk) 09:28, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Something Like Gold (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Cyber.Eyes.2005 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Clearly fails WP:Notability; a Nigerian movie released a few months ago, with cited sources 1 and 3 failing verification. Source 2 is a "Coming soon" poster, and the only reliable source seems to be the 4th source, which is a news website. Per en:Wikipedia:Notability (films), and considering the cited sources, here is my review of this page:

1. N The film is widely distributed and has received full-length reviews by two or more nationally known critics.

2. The film is historically notable, as evidenced by one or more of the following:

• N Publication of at least two non-trivial articles, at least five years after the film's initial release.
• N The film was deemed notable by a broad survey of film critics, academics, or movie professionals when such a poll was conducted at least five years after the film's release.
• N The film was given a commercial re-release or screened in a festival at least five years after the initial release.
• N The film was featured as part of a documentary, program, or retrospective on the history of cinema.

3. N The film has received a major award for excellence in some aspect of filmmaking.

4. N The film was selected for preservation in a national archive.

5. N The film is "taught" as a subject at an accredited university or college with a notable film program. – Cyber.Eyes2005^Talk 05:52, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

•  Delete doesn't pass notability. Article seems like a paid promotional content SaneFlint (talk) 14:51, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Comment: The creator of this page User:Mastashat has been blocked indefinitely, so this is a G5 case as well. – Cyber.Eyes2005^Talk 09:43, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Striking comment; G5 only applies if the creator was evading a block at the time of the article's creation. – Cyber.Eyes2005^Talk 13:49, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Delete Per nom, fails NFILM. The only rationale I can see for keeping this is the claim that it was ranked highest grossing Nollywood film in 2023, but the coverage related to that isn't in-depth enough.— *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 10:39, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•  Delete This article doesn't pass notability at all. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 04:42, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 05:52, 12 January 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.