The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to Keep. Redirected. --Auntof6 (talk) 03:34, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gastrodon

[change source]

Gastrodon (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

QuicoleJR has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not a notable Pokémon. The English Wikipedia currently does not have an article about it. QuicoleJR (talk) 15:30, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

[change source]

The absence of an English Wikipedia article is not a good reason for deletion. Rathfelder (talk) 22:12, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Rathfelder: I know that, but there is no indication that this Pokémon is any more notable than the 800 others. QuicoleJR (talk) 01:17, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep/Redirect to List of Pokémon While I believe I have included some credible and relevant sources, there are many more available.DIV IN E 20:34, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - we don't need an article on every obscure Pokémon. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 20:36, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Pokemon that is not even known. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 20:57, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of Pokémon. While the article is not notable, I actually think it could be a useful redirect. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 16:11, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DIVINE: The US Sun does not have real significant coverage of Gastrodon, and the Sportskeeda source does not seem like it would contribute to notability either. Besides, you need more sources than that for a fictional character. QuicoleJR (talk) 21:10, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. I will re-check and dig if I find more reliable sources, but there seem to be many sources about it. I am confused with the reliability of those sources. DIV IN E 21:15, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@QuicoleJR Just to let you know, I have added additional sources which you can find in the article reference section. DIV IN E 19:24, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merge To List of Pokémon; references on the page are showing as depreciated and generally unreliable. Thanks, and be well! - PDL^{Talk to me!}_{Please don't eat da 🐑!} 19:32, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 15:30, 19 April 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.