The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. I see consensus to delete. The redirect option can be re-explored if we ever have a suitable page with a relevant list of characters.--Gordonrox24 | ^Talk 01:30, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sean Ryan Fox (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

SHB2000 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This article was started by someone who was evading their global lock + their local block too. SHB2000 (talk) 23:03, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

• Delete, fails our notability guideline for actors with a lack of TV or film roles. At the moment, his only notable credits seems to be his roles in Jake and the Never Land Pirates and Henry Danger. Aranya (talk) 23:22, 16 October 2021 (UTC) 16:10, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, seems to be notable, I add some reliable sources to the article Demexx (talk) 16:44, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

CU blocked and now globally locked. SHB2000 (talk) 01:48, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

•  Keep The fact that an article is created by a banned, even CU blocked and globally locked editor, is completely irrelevant to whether it should be deleted. Its notability and perhaps whether it is written simply is all that matters. It exists happily in 4 major wikis and comfortably meets GNG. That's all we should be concerned about. Blissyu2 (talk) 11:23, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  We don't delete pages based on the status of the creator here at least. So the nomination rationale can be changed @SHB2000? But then it exist in 4 languages doesn't mean it can fit here, nor meets GNG. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 12:18, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  By not deleting these pages, it's kind of like rolling the welcome mat for those who are banned to continue block evading. By deleting this, we lose little, but sends a signal to the LTA that they're not welcome to [b]lock evade. SHB2000 (talk) 12:24, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  @SHB2000 I agree too but we never successfully got consensus on such a clause, and side note, the strike is removed via this edit Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 12:27, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  Anyway, I still get the same sentiments as Aranya. But interesting to see this wiki not delete articles because it was created by banned users in violation of their ban SHB2000 (talk) 12:29, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  Actually not here only, zhwp doesn't too @SHB2000. Generally here it's evaluated based on the merits of the article. I tried to use that reason for my early RFDs, but not all buy it, so I changed to notablity wise etc. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 12:39, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  The English Wikivoyage is still quite divided on this issue as well. There's a policy on "no deleting real places", but then there's a regular LTA who creates articles for random towns in the middle of Queensland (state of Australia). I often try and improve it at times to the point where most of the article was written by me, but when I can't improve it, I either speedy it (examples are en:voy:Peregian), or before I became a sysop there, those LTA's articles were nominated for deletion, some said keep since it's a real place, and others inc. myself preferred delete. They did eventually get deleted though but it's still an issue never resolved to this day. SHB2000 (talk) 12:46, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Doesn't meet notability guidelines here.-BRP ^ever 12:52, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
•  (change conflict) Anyway my take is, we can follow en practice to redirect to a page like en:List_of_Henry_Danger_characters#Jasper_Dunlop. Individually lacks notability as it doesn't seems to be covered by adequate sources, but surely we can redirect if the page exists. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 12:54, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
•  Delete Clear delete, not because the article was created by a banned user, but because the actor is non-notable. SkeletalDome$ (talk) 18:44, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep he is an American actor and know for Jasper Dunlop in Henry Danger 105.112.228.202 (talk) 20:44, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    The fact that he is an actor doesn’t automatically make him notable. Notability needs to be shown with reliable and independent sources and it hasn’t been because the only references in the article are some of his social media accounts. SkeletalDome$ (talk) 02:20, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 23:03, 23 October 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.