The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Keep. Peterdownunder (talk) 10:08, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kaho Naa... Pyaar Hai (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Contested quick-deletion, let's do a regular RfD. QD proposed as 'Advertising'. Ideas= Eptalon (talk) 17:55, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

•  Keep there is no obligation to bring an article to RfD when declining a QD. Judging from the enwiki article, it is clearly a notable topic. The article does not appear to be advertising at all. I see no rationale for deletion here. --IWI (talk) 18:03, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
•  Keep - Appears to be notable, and it is definitely not advertising. --Belwine • 💬 • 📜 18:24, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
•  Keep--Hellothere4 (talk) 18:25, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
•  Keep Yes, it is a notable topic. It is not associated with advertising at all. The article with the same name in the English Wikipedia also says it's notable and there are sources that say so. I prefer that this article stay. AbhinavA1694 (talk) 19:12, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  Noting that the above user has since been blocked as a sockpuppet. --IWI (talk) 11:10, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

•  Keep 100% notable topic. Regardless, I read the article and it is not an advertising page. DJRC (talk) 19:42, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@DJRC: I'm guessing you read the article from the main English Wikipedia. AbhinavA1694 (talk) 19:55, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@AbhinavA1694:, first of all, I read the page in this wiki present at this moment. It is not an ad page. And last I saw that you didn't ping me properly. Next time use ((ping|username without "User:" prefix)) for pinging someone.DJRC (talk) 08:55, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 17:55, 10 February 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.