The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Withdrawn by nom here. -DJSasso (talk) 13:59, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Idiot (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

轻语者 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Wikipedia is not a dictionary. 轻语者 (talk) 02:03, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

• This page should not be here. It is a perfectly normal Simple page, and was momentarily seen in a vandalised condition. It's not good process for us to discuss pages which have been on the wiki for some years and do not meet the deletion requirements in any way. It is in no way a candidate for deletion. Macdonald-ross (talk) 11:53, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Macdonald-ross: I am unclear. Are you choosing to vote  Keep or  Delete? --Examknow^talk 02:20, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Examknow: 99% sure he is saying keep. Computer Fizz (talk) 02:31, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - the section "In literature and folklore" makes the article more than a mere dictionary definition. Chenzw  Talk  11:48, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Keep Page is stone-etched, and nomination reason invalid. Computer Fizz (talk) 02:31, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Considerably more than a dictdef. -DJSasso (talk) 13:57, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 02:03, 15 December 2019 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.