The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. --Eptalon (talk) 08:09, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bouncing ball (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Gotanda has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: A single element in CSS does not rise to the level of importance or notability for its own entry. No references. No explanation other than this is a div element that exists. Are we going to have entries for every css element? I initially put this up for QD but that was rejected, so here it is. Thank you! Gotanda (talk) 10:55, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

• Delete. Could have been QD'd under A1 as there's little or no meaning to the text. It's not a science stub, so that's wrong too. Bin. DaneGeld (talk) 13:01, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as too complex - It's also worth noting one would expect an article about an actual bouncing ball .... not something to do with CSS. –Davey2010^Talk 01:22, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as above. (Side note: if the page is retained somehow, it needs to be renamed to "Bouncing ball (CSS element)" or something of that ilk.) StevenJ81 (talk) 13:51, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 10:55, 15 May 2018 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.