Hello, Wwikix, and welcome to the Simple English Wikipedia! Thank you for your changes.
You may want to begin by reading these pages:
For some ideas of pages to work on, read Wikipedia:Requested pages or the list of wanted pages.
You can change any pages you want! Any changes you make can be seen right away. You can ask questions at Wikipedia:Simple talk. At the end of your messages on talk pages, please sign your name by typing "~~~~" (four tildes).
If you need help just click here and type ((helpme)) and your question and someone will reply to you shortly.
Good luck and happy changing! --Tbennert (talk) 18:40, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello! Thank you for creating Category:Israeli people by location. However, we normally need at least three pages in a category before it is created. Because categories are a way to group together similar articles, there is no need to create a new category for just one or two articles. If you think there might be more pages to add to the new category, please add them now. Thank you. Auntof6 (talk) 21:05, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
The Netherlands Barnstar of National Merit | ||
For your work with articles and categories related to the Netherlands. --Auntof6 (talk) 19:52, 9 January 2017 (UTC) |
Thanks. Wwikix (talk) 10:49, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello! I was reviewing some of your new pages today. I noticed the location ones usually included something like "It has about 11,000 inhabitants (2015)". Inhabitants is a complex word, so I'm changing it to people. It would be good to use people on any new locations pages you create. Not a big thing but it will make the articles a bit simpler. Overall your articles look good. Many thanks for all the additions! --Tbennert (talk) 06:09, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello! Thank you for creating Category:Geography of Oceania by country. However, we normally need at least three pages in a category before it is created. Because categories are a way to group together similar articles, there is no need to create a new category for just one or two articles. If you think there might be more pages to add to the new category, please add them now. Thank you. Auntof6 (talk) 18:38, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi Wwikix. You edited the Battle of Midway by adding the category:History of New Zealand. I'm missing something because I can't figure out how the two are related. They are about 5,000 miles apart; to my knowledge no New Zealand ships were in the order of battle nor were any New Zealand units mentioned as being among the defenders of Midway Island. New Zealanders did serve aboard ships of the Royal Navy during WWII, but I don't recall ever reading of any RN ships being in this battle. At least two NZ ships were island-hopping with the American fleet, but were not listed as being at this battle. There is nothing I see in the article that would make this about New Zealand. I didn't remove it because I presume you had something in mind when you added it. Could you help me understand what that was? Thanks Rus793 (talk) 15:21, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi, Wwikix. I think you've been doing a good job categorizing things. I appreciate that you seem to include all the appropriate categories on both articles and categories -- many people only include one or two.
I do want to mention a couple of things. One is that you categorized entertainers under artists. Not all entertainers are artists, so we don't put the whole category there. The other thing is that I saw you categorize some people as scientists who don't appear to be scientists. These included Yair Auron, Yaakov Neeman, and Benjamin Netanyahu. Am I missing something about why you thought these were scientists? --Auntof6 (talk) 19:51, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
(talk page stalker) As for the scientist part, you can see the academics, etc. are already included in Category:Scientists. So if someone goes into Category:Political scientists they are also included in Scientists. It's like placing an article in Category:Geography of the Netherlands and then also in Category:Netherlands - redundant.
As for entertainers being artists, I totally get your reasoning. I too have thought entertainers would be a subcategory. But - on en.wikipedia categories get discussed thoroughly, and a consensus is reached eventually. In this case it means entertainers are a separate category than artists. --Tbennert (talk) 21:40, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
@Auntof6 - You use a very strict definition of what a scientist should be. Very often academics are doing some sort of science, so for practical reasons I should say put the category academic also in the category science.
@Tbennert - It isn't redundant placing a person in the category:academic and also into the category e.g. political scienist. It's like categorizing someone in the category chemist and also into the category physicist.
Wwikix (talk) 09:26, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
Ok, entertainers not under artists, and academics not under scientists. Wwikix (talk) 11:46, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
Would you please consider going to Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Patroller and requesting Patroller rights? This will mean any of the new articles you create will not need to be reviewed by another editor. This lets people who review new pages move on to other pages needing more attention. Thanks! --Tbennert (talk) 01:49, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
Please make sure to use change summaries when you make changes. You had a long stretch where you were changing templates without explaining your changes. The summaries are helpful for others to see what's being changed. Only (talk) 13:43, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi, Wwikix. I was wondering why you removed the defaultsort from this article. Any article whose title starts with the word the should have a defaultsort so that the article sorts by the second word. The same is true for the words a and an when they are used as English articles. This is explained at Wikipedia:Categories#Special sorting. I put the defaultsort back on this article. Please don't remove any more from articles that need them. Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 17:12, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
In English, it is almost universal for people to use the form "Mount X" and that should be the default format. There are some exceptions, for example Ben Nevis, but in this case 'Ben' is Gaelic for 'mountain'.. A second point is that we do not need to follow English wiki where the particular needs of our readers suggests a better way of writing for them. Macdonald-ross (talk) 10:48, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
If you want this category to be by ocean instead of region, you need to reorganize the contents so that there's only one entry per ocean. Right now there are three subcats for the Pacific Ocean. Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 21:00, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
For what particular reason would there be two blank lines instead of one in certain articles? In other words, two blank lines preceding a stub template. Angela Maureen (talk) 23:13, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
I removed the paraphilia category you added to Category:LGBT. I don't believe LGBT fits under paraphilia. Our article Paraphilia even addresses that. If you think it belongs in the paraphilia category and you want to put it back, please discuss it first. --Auntof6 (talk) 11:01, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi, Wwikix. I just noticed that you had categorized some categories for settlements and cities in Africa under geography. Those things certainly are political geography, but on this Wikipedia we don't put them under geography. I wasn't around when that was decided, but my view on why we do that is that people commonly think of geography as physical geography: things like mountains, rivers, etc. If we put settlements there, people might have trouble finding those categories.
So when categorizing settlements, they can go directly under the category for the place where they are. If there is a settlement category that contains cities, towns, etc., that goes directly under the place. If there is no settlement category (usually because there aren't enough entries to create one), then the categories for cities, etc. can go directly under the place.
If you have any questions about this, feel free to ask. For the most part, I think you've been doing some good category work, so thanks! --Auntof6 (talk) 21:46, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
An editor has requested deletion of Category:Female politicians, an article you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Please comment on the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2017/Category:Female politicians and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also change the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much. Auntof6 (talk) 18:30, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
When labeling articles for quick deletion, please do not blank the articles. That makes it harder for admins to know what content was there previously that is worthy of deletion. The only time we do blank when tagging is if there's an attack against someone in the article. Please also remember to warn users when you revert vandalism. Only (talk) 13:26, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Wwikix. As you may have seen, there is a discussion at Wikipedia:Simple talk#Problem with User:Wwikix and categorization about the category work you do. Because of that, I have removed your patroller right so that categories you create will need to be patrolled. This is not to say that there is necessarily anything wrong with the categories, just that I'd like your work to be patrolled for the time being. Thanks for your understanding. --Auntof6 (talk) 19:21, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
Please note that to categorize people by ethnicity, gender, religion, or sexuality, a reference is required. This applies whether the information is mentioned in article text, an infobox, or in categories. I just removed this information from some articles you created (Tom Lanoye and Tom Lanoye). Please include this information only if there is a reference for it. You can see en:Wikipedia:Categorization/Ethnicity, gender, religion and sexuality for more information. Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 21:50, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
Even if Begin was a member of an organization that some saw as terrorist, we don't categorize him as a terrorist. Please stop categorizing him that way. --Auntof6 (talk) 15:09, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi, Wwikix. I noticed that you removed the defaultsort from List of settlements in Trinidad and Tobago. Please leave the defaultsort in "List of" articles even if none of the current categories is using it. That's so that it will be there if other categories are added, such as with HotCat, and the editor adding them either doesn't think to check the defaultsort or they expect the standard list article defaultsort to be there. Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 12:20, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi, again. You might not have known, but here we categorize settlements of a place (for example, of a country or continent) directly under the category for the place, not under its geography or subdivisions. Settlements are different from subdivisions, which are usually things that a place is divided into (hence the term "subdivision"). For example, Brazil is divided into states,meaninng that every part of its area is in one state or another. Not all the area of a place is usually covered by settlements; there are usually areas that are outside of all defined settlements. --Auntof6 (talk) 13:02, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
I noticed that you categorized a couple of musical groups under Category:Costa Rican people. Organizations, including musical groups, don't go in people categories. Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 13:26, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Since the issues for these categories are the same, it was disruptive to create sixteen separate discussions. It would have made it much easier on your fellow editors if you had combined them somehow. Would you object to combining them? I could do the combining, if you're OK with that. --Auntof6 (talk) 04:38, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
If you want to characterize Likud as a conservative liberal party rather than a conservative party, I think you need to back that up with a reliable source. (The article conservative liberal really needs a source itself.) Note: I don't necessarily disagree. But I do think you need a source, since I don't think that Likud itself thinks of itself that way, or at least does not articulate what it thinks of itself that way. StevenJ81 (talk) 18:24, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
Would you please explain the purpose of this edit and similar ones you made? It appears that the change was only to put the categories in a different order. Am I missing something? If that was the purpose, then please note:
If you have any questions, feel free to ask. --Auntof6 (talk) 09:30, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi, Wwikix:
I noticed in doing some new page patrolling today that you have generally given all of these articles their transliterated Hebrew names. It seems to me that per en:WP:COMMONNAME (ours is just a soft redirect to that), the following should probably list under their English names, because that's how they are generally described in English media:
I appreciate that you included redirects in all cases. But is there a reason you did it this way? StevenJ81 (talk) 19:31, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
Although I would prefer the Hebrew names I understand that certain Hebrew party names can be a problem because they are not often used and very long, and therefore not very clear to the reader.
For that reason I would like to propose the following:
To be changed:
Reason: not often used and very long.
Not to be changed:
Reason: more or less used and not (so) long.
It is according how I drew up the Template:Israeli political parties. Wwikix (talk) 10:12, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
I would make an exception for HaAvoda and maintain this name.
I am not able to rename the other three parties.
Wwikix (talk) 15:16, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi. I've been going through your recent Israel politician articles. I'm not finished yet (and won't tonight), but I'm marking them as patrolled as I see them. However, the articles on Tzipi Livni and Zehava Gal-On (so far) really need to be simplified—especially the Livni article.
Also, the Livni article and the one about Avigdor Lieberman describe the parties they created as having been "erected". This would be an awkward construction even in a non-limited English, like regular English Wikipedia. (Does Hebrew use הוקם in a setting like this?) In Simple English Wikipedia you need to use a different verb ("started" is probably best, though "created" might work, too). StevenJ81 (talk) 23:01, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
I removed Category:German Lutherans which you added to this article. To indicate a person's religion, even just in a category, there needs to be a reference for it in the text (required for living people) or indication of the relevance of the person's religion. Please keep this in mind when categorizing people. Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 16:54, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
An editor has requested deletion of Template:Limburg, an article you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Please comment on the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2017/Template:Limburg and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also change the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much. Auntof6 (talk) 06:05, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
If it ever comes up again, please don't move something that's currently at RfD. It messes up the links in the RfD and makes for messier cleanup. Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 09:30, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
I have noticed that you have been making lots of edits like [1] recently - it is generally unhelpful as if you now go to that category everything will be categorised under U (for university), rather than by their actual name. I am happy to revert this if you have got other stuff to do - but it does need to be reverted. MiloDenn, Talk, Contribs 10:26, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar | ||
While not everything you do is perfect, generally you make lots of helpful changes and don't seek any recognition for it so here is a Barnstar for you! MiloDenn, Talk, Contribs 15:53, 13 July 2017 (UTC) |
Thanks. Wwikix (talk) 15:54, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi, Wwikix. I noticed that you moved Ardennes to Ardennes (disambiguation) about a month ago, leaving a redirect. You might not have known, but when both pages exist like this and the page with the unqualified name is not an article, the article with the qualified name (in this case, Ardennes (disambiguation)) should be the redirect, not the other way around. That is so that the qualified name can be used for deliberate links to the dab (to make it obvious that the link is intentional), and so that we know that links to the unqualified name need to be disambiguated. It also helps with disambiguating, because the page with the unqualified name, which is the one articles might link to, contains the possible meanings. I have reversed the move you did, so that Ardennes (disambiguation) is now the redirect. --Auntof6 (talk) 08:13, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
Are you the same pe rson who operates WIKIASITE:c:User:Timmypizza
No. Wwikix (talk) 15:21, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
Could you put a description on this category? Without it, it can be interpreted as models who are not children. Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 07:46, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi, Wwikix. I noticed that you created Rosen, and tagged it as a disambiguation page (also known as "dab page"). That page is not a dab page, because all the links in it are to articles about people whose given name or surname is Rosen. Those kinds of links can be on dab pages, but only if there are also other links of the proper type. An example of this is Leon. If you have any questions about this, feel free to ask. --Auntof6 (talk) 18:51, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
An editor has requested deletion of Category:Lists of Nobel Prize scientists, an article you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Please comment on the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2017/Category:Lists of Nobel Prize scientists and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also change the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much. Auntof6 (talk) 06:38, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
FYI, I removed adultery and prostitution from this category because they aren't necessarily crimes. --Auntof6 (talk) 09:51, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
I don't agree, because they can also be crimes (not in all cases and countries) and therefore should be categorized in this category.
Furthermore I want to emphasize that they had already been categorized in the Category:Types of crime.
Wwikix (talk) 15:02, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Please see en:WP:COPDEF: we don't want to categorize people under a potentially controversial or derogatory category like this unless it was a defining aspect of their life. I have added the enwiki category's explanation to our cat as a reminder. Please keep this in mind for other similar categories. Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 11:05, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
Please stop moving categories out of the proper alphabetical order we use here. Thanks. -DJSasso (talk) 14:15, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
They were categorized: 1. Nobel Prize winners by nationality. 2. People of the country. Please respect this. Wwikix (talk) 14:17, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello! I have removed your changes from Template:Did you know. Hooks need to first be brought to Wikipedia:Did you know for community review. Once approved they go into one of the Queues. Then there are some technical things which need to happen to make the facts appear on the main page, archive the information, and some other things. I'm glad you want to contribute to the page! --Tbennert (talk) 20:25, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi Wwikix,
Firstly, thanks for all the help you have provided on pages that I started.
I am just curious why you changed the lede of Venkatraman Ramakrishnan from Indian biochemist to Indian-born American-British biochemist and biophysicist? Specifically, why is he a British-American biophysicist?
Would you kindly respond on my talkpage, Thanks in advance Ottawahitech (talk) 16:44, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Yes, he was a planter and had slaves. However:
Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 17:07, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
An editor has requested deletion of Category:People accused of sexual abuse, an article you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Please comment on the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2017/Category:People accused of sexual abuse and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also change the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much. Auntof6 (talk) 09:00, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
As I've mentioned at least twice before (see above), you need to be careful when mentioning a person's religion or categorizing a person by religion. Here is the guideline on this:
An example of where you did not follow this is John Ashcroft. I know you just combined two categories that were already there, but any time you touch religion categories in a biography you need to evaluate them per the above. Another example is John Ensign.
Before categorizing people by religion, please make sure you have checked all the above. Before you categorize any more, please go back and check the ones you have already done to make sure these guidelines are followed. I realize that might be a big job, but it's a requirement --Auntof6 (talk) 08:25, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Shalom, W. I hope you agree with my recent change to Shabbath, making it redirect to Shabbat rather than to Sabbath. I documented my reason on the Talk:Shabbath page. But if I misunderstood your intention, please write in the Edit summary if you undo or or on that Talk page if you rollback. By the way, I'm delighted that you've got a Sandbox draft going for Meretz MK Ilan Gilon, he's one of my local heroes. (I don't create new pages myself.) Happy Chanukah! -- Deborahjay (talk) 16:40, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
A sandbox page should not appear in any categories. To correct this: After you test the categories you want to appear, deactivate the Sandbox page from each of those categories by placing a colon to the right of the left-hand pair of square brackets. You'll see I've just done this on User:Wwikix/Sandbox. When the page becomes a mainspace article, you'll remove those colons manually - the admin who answered this query on Simple talk (Jan. 15) says that's how it's done. Let me know if you have any questions about this. -- Deborahjay (talk) 11:29, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
It's only for a short time that the sandbox page appear in several categories. Wwikix (talk) 11:31, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
Treating people in this way is beyond anything that can be called "fair". You shouldn't behave like this towards serious volunteers who made a great effort to make Wikipedia better! Last but not least it isn't an advertisement for (the Simple English) Wikipedia!! Go on like this and after some time nobody is doing anything anymore at all!!!
Wwikix (talk) 11:43, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.
You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.
Thank you!
I am not a disruptive editor, that is nonsense. I try to avoid edit wars etc. but one is not perfect. So it is not reasonable to block for indefinite time a serious, hard working user because this user was involved in one single, little 'edit war'. Wwikix (talk) 11:12, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
I am blocked here because of a so-called "one-strike rule", because of one single, little edit war I am blocked for indefinite time. And after I had been blocked you came with other accusations to justify your blocking of me. That is not reasonable. That is not the way how serious users who do a lot of good work should be treated!!! Wwikix (talk) 11:55, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
It is not reasonable to block me for indefinite time! Wwikix (talk) 17:57, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
I have been working on this Wikipedia since January 2017 and performed nearly 34,000 edits. I made a lot of articles, elaborated many articles, elaborated and created many categories and combatted vandalism. Wwikix (talk) 11:34, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.
If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.
If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.
An editor has requested deletion of Christianity and homosexuality, an article you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Please comment on the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2019/Christianity and homosexuality and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also change the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much. --Gotanda (talk) 06:12, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
An editor has requested deletion of Stephen Paddock, an article you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Please comment on the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2019/Stephen Paddock and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also change the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much. IWI (chat) 23:49, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
An editor has requested deletion of Category:Subdivision of the United Kingdom, an article you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Please comment on the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2020/Category:Subdivision of the United Kingdom and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also change the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much. ~Prahlad balaji (t / c) 18:16, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
An editor has requested deletion of Template:Dutch political leaders, an article you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Please comment on the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2022/Template:Dutch political leaders and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also change the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much. --Ferien (talk) 14:35, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
An editor has requested deletion of Category:Aldermen of Belgium, an article you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Please comment on the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2022/Category:Aldermen of Belgium and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also change the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much. --Ferien (talk) 21:37, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
An editor has requested deletion of Category:Former members of the House of Representatives of the Netherlands, an article you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Please comment on the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2022/Category:Former members of the House of Representatives of the Netherlands and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also change the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much. MathXplore (talk) 07:00, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
An editor has requested deletion of Category:Israeli-Palestinian people, a page you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Please comment on the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2023/Category:Israeli-Palestinian people and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also change the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much. --Ferien (talk) 16:00, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
An editor has requested deletion of Category:Former rural districts of Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, a page you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Please comment on the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2023/Category:Former rural districts of Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also change the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much. --Ferien (talk) 10:36, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
An editor has requested deletion of Category:Former Members of Knesset, a page you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Please comment on the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2023/Category:Former Members of Knesset and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also change the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 22:17, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
An editor has requested deletion of Category:Former leaders of political parties in the Netherlands, a page you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Please comment on the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2023/Category:Former leaders of political parties in the Netherlands and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also change the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much. MathXplore (talk) 07:27, 15 July 2023 (UTC)