This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators said no to this unblock request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not unblock the user without a good reason. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I did not do anything wrong. Rowde (talk) 12:02, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Well being that you were doing the same stuff here as on en, I can't say your reasoning shows you understand what you did wrong so I have to decline. -- DJSasso (talk) 13:50, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
As I said on your unblock request on one of your many IPs, you've been blocked for committing the same pattern of behaviors on Simple English Wikipedia as you did on the English Wikipedia. Only (talk) 12:12, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
note: per policy, you MUST keep any declined unblock requests on your page for the duration of the block. You cannot remove them and replace with a new one. You must put any new ones below previous declines and discussions. Only (talk) 13:12, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators said no to this unblock request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not unblock the user without a good reason. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I did not do anything wrong, I was on the right all the time and I'm still am. Rowde (talk) 13:01, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You are logging this with both an IP and a User, that is in itself block evasion, and sock puppetry. Therefore your talk page access is also being removed. -- Enfcer (talk) 23:45, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
if you delete the previous unblock request and my responses again, you will have your talk page access removed. They must stay here for admins to see in considering your unblock. Only (talk) 13:17, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]