Thank you for trying things out on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it is now gone. Please use the sandbox if you want to do any more tests, and see the welcome page if you want to learn about helping Simple English Wikipedia. Archer7 17:00, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your sense of humour is vandalising a valuable learning resource? Archer7 17:00, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This site is laughed at. A valuable resource of knowledge? This is simply a source of entertainment. You cannot really think that the entries on "shaving" and "hobos" are serious. Even in the real Wikipedia is simply laughed at.

You may laugh, but those articles can be useful sometimes. Wikipedia is useful to thousands of people every day. The reason it is laughed about is because there are many people (like you) that set out to ruin it. Only what the patrollers miss is publicised, not our good work. Archer7 17:05, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

lol. I don't set out to ruin it. I'm just goofing off. People can't rely on this site BECAUSE it is so frely editable. And thus, it is also a lot of fun in other ways.

It needs to be freely editable to enable everyone to contribute what they know. And it isn't fun for me, I've got better things I could be doing. Archer7 17:09, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well done, keep it up! Archer7 17:10, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I helped you with the Daffy Duck article you created! I hope you like my help! :D —This unsigned comment was added by DogPog1000 (talk • changes) 06:09, 15 December 2015‎ (UTC)

Interesting that you were able to determine that this user created an article about Daffy Duck nearly ten years ago, but you claim not to be able to sign your posts or follow other guidelines. Etamni | ✉ | ✓  15:52, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]