Halaman arsip Warung Kopi | |||||||||||
![]() |
Kebijakan Arsip · Terkini |
![]() |
Usulan Arsip · Terkini |
![]() |
Teknis Arsip · Terkini |
![]() |
Bahasa Arsip · Terkini |
![]() |
Berita Arsip · Terkini |
![]() |
Lain-lain Arsip · Terkini |
Hi everyone! Apologies for posting this in English. Translations are very welcome.
We're beginning the second part of the Community Tech team's Community Wishlist Survey, and we're inviting all active contributors to vote on the proposals that have been submitted.
Thanks to you and other Wikimedia contributors, 111 proposals were submitted to the team. We've split the proposals into categories, and now it's time to vote! You can vote for any proposal listed on the pages, using the ((Support)) tag. Feel free to add comments pro or con, but only support votes will be counted. The voting period will be 2 weeks, ending on December 14.
The proposals with the most support votes will be the team's top priority backlog to investigate and address. Thank you for participating, and we're looking forward to hearing what you think!
Community Tech via
MediaWiki message delivery (bicara) 1 Desember 2015 14.38 (UTC)
Permisi, saya mau tanya. Kelayakan peristiwa panduannya udah ada belum ya? Saya liat cuma ada biografi, album/lagu, web, sekolah, atau apa lah. Nah, barusan cek artikel tentang kecelakaan kereta di Angke, referensi sih banyak. Nah, bedanya dengan Wikinews apa ya? Mau dibuatkah Wikipedia:Kelayakan artikel/peristiwa? Rujukannya paling ya en:Wikipedia:Notability (events). Apa mau dicopy semuanya atau disesuaikan? Mohon kerja samanya. MRFazry (bicara) 6 Desember 2015 07.44 (UTC)
Hello Wikimedians!
The Wikipedia Library is announcing signups today for, free, full-access accounts to published research as part of our Publisher Donation Program. You can sign up for new accounts and research materials from:
Many other partnerships with accounts available are listed on our partners page, including EBSCO, DeGruyter, and Newspaperarchive.com. Do better research and help expand the use of high quality references across Wikipedia projects: sign up today!
--The Wikipedia Library Team 01:01, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
This is a message from the Wikimedia Foundation. Translations are available.
As many of you know, January 15 is Wikipedia’s 15th Birthday!
People around the world are getting involved in the celebration and have started adding their events on Meta Page. While we are celebrating Wikipedia's birthday, we hope that all projects and affiliates will be able to utilize this celebration to raise awareness of our community's efforts.
Haven’t started planning? Don’t worry, there’s lots of ways to get involved. Here are some ideas:
Everything is linked on the Wikipedia 15 Meta page. You’ll find a set of ten data visualization works that you can show at your events, and a list of all the Wikipedia 15 logos that community members have already designed.
If you have any questions, please contact Zachary McCune or Joe Sutherland.
Thanks and Happy nearly Wikipedia 15!
-The Wikimedia Foundation Communications team
Posted by the MediaWiki message delivery, 18 Desember 2015 20.58 (UTC) • Tolong bantu terjemahkan ke bahasa Anda • Bantuan
Hello
We have started an RFC on meta to increase password requirements for users that have accounts which can edit MediaWiki:Common.js, have access to checkuser or have access to Oversight.
These types of accounts have sensitive access to our sites, and can cause real harm if they fall into malicious hands. Currently the only requirement is the password is at least 1 letter long. We would like to make the minimum be 8 letters (bytes) long and also ban certain really common passwords.
By increasing requirements on passwords for accounts with high levels of access, we hope to make Wikimedia wikis more secure for everyone. Please read the full text of the proposal here, and make your voice heard at the RFC.
Thank you
Tolong bantu terjemahkan ke bahasa Anda
(On behalf of the WMF security team) BWolff (WMF) (bicara) 21 Desember 2015 07.59 (UTC)
Delivered using the distribution list
Hi everyone! Apologies for posting in English. Translations are very welcome.
The Community Tech team at the Wikimedia Foundation is focused on building improved curation and moderation tools for experienced Wikimedia contributors. We're now starting a Community Wishlist Survey to find the most useful projects that we can work on.
For phase 1 of the survey, we're inviting all active contributors to submit brief proposals, explaining the project that you'd like us to work on, and why it's important. Phase 1 will last for 2 weeks. In phase 2, we'll ask you to vote on the proposals. Afterwards, we'll analyze the top 10 proposals and create a prioritized wishlist.
While most of this process will be conducted in English, we're inviting people from any Wikimedia wiki to submit proposals. We'll also invite volunteer translators to help translate proposals into English.
Your proposal should include: the problem that you want to solve, who would benefit, and a proposed solution, if you have one. You can submit your proposal on the Community Wishlist Survey page, using the entry field and the big blue button. We will be accepting proposals for 2 weeks, ending on November 23.
We're looking forward to hearing your ideas!
Hello! Wikimania 2016 scholarships will soon be open; by the end of the week we'll form the committee and we need your help, see Scholarship committee for details.
If you want to carefully review nearly a thousand applications in January, you might be a perfect committee member. Otherwise, you can volunteer as "ambassador": you will observe all the committee activities, ensure that people from your language or project manage to apply for a scholarship, translate scholarship applications written in your language to English and so on. Ambassadors are allowed to ask for a scholarship, unlike committee members.
Wikimania 2016 scholarships subteam 10 November 2015 10.47 (UTC)
Tolong bantu terjemahkan ke bahasa Anda
The Community Advocacy team the Wikimedia Foundation has opened a consultation on the topic of harassment on Meta. The consultation period is intended to run for one month from today, November 16, and end on December 17. Please share your thoughts there on harassment-related issues facing our communities and potential solutions. (Note: this consultation is not intended to evaluate specific cases of harassment, but rather to discuss the problem of harassment itself.)
Apakah halaman yang resmi harus mempunyai beberapa referensi Arifys(Arifys)
This is a message regarding the proposed 2015 Free Bassel banner. Translations are available.
Hi everyone,
This is to inform all Wikimedia contributors that a straw poll seeking your involvement has just been started on Meta-Wiki.
As some of your might be aware, a small group of Wikimedia volunteers have proposed a banner campaign informing Wikipedia readers about the urgent situation of our fellow Wikipedian, open source software developer and Creative Commons activist, Bassel Khartabil. An exemplary banner and an explanatory page have now been prepared, and translated into about half a dozen languages by volunteer translators.
We are seeking your involvement to decide if the global Wikimedia community approves starting a banner campaign asking Wikipedia readers to call on the Syrian government to release Bassel from prison. We understand that a campaign like this would be unprecedented in Wikipedia's history, which is why we're seeking the widest possible consensus among the community.
Given Bassel's urgent situation and the resulting tight schedule, we ask everyone to get involved with the poll and the discussion to the widest possible extent, and to promote it among your communities as soon as possible.
(Apologies for writing in English; please kindly translate this message into your own language.)
Thank you for your participation!
Posted by the MediaWiki message delivery 21:47, 25 November 2015 (UTC) • Translate • Get help
Saya melihat Pembicaraan Wikipedia:Daftar pilihan/Kriteria/Pemungutan suara/2 telah disetujui. Namun, apakah proposal itu benar-benar disetujui? Masalahnya, di Wikipedia:Prosedur penetapan kebijakan dan pedoman#Prosedur konsensus, tertulis kriteria bahwa minimal jumlah suara setuju agar sebuah proposal dapat disetujui adalah 3 pengguna dan minimal disetujui juga oleh 2 pengguna pengurus dan untuk pengurus, jumlah suara setuju yang dibutuhkan adalah minimal 2/3 dari jumlah semua suara pengguna pengurus, sedangkan di pemungutan suara tersebut hanya tertulis "Minimal suara setuju adalah 3 pengguna terdaftar". Pembicaraan Wikipedia:Daftar pilihan/Sistem daftar pilihan/Pemungutan suara/2 juga mengalami hal serupa, namun diskusi masih berlangsung. Apalagi saya juga melihat penganvasan yang dilakukan oleh pengusul masing-masing pemungutan suara. Lihat ini dan ini. Terima kasih. Hanamanteo Halaman pembicaraan saya 10 Oktober 2015 14.11 (UTC)
Alhamdulillahi rabbil 'alamin. Kini, Wikipedia:Plagiarisme telah hadir dan Anda diminta untuk mengusulkan apakah halaman ini layak dijadikan sebagai kebijakan atau pedoman di Wikipedia. Silakan beri suara Anda untuk usulan ini. Masukan kepada saya apabila ada kekurangan materi atau perubahan kebijakan akan saya terima dengan tangan terbuka. Perubahan dapat diobrolkan di halaman pembicaraan saya. Nuwun.
Alqhaderi AliffianikoBicara 26 Oktober 2015 12.58 (UTC)
Hi everyone,
A while ago I announced a rollout date for enabling a feature here - access to arbitrary data from Wikidata. We encountered some issues and decided to delay the rollout to make sure we're not screwing things up. I'm sorry for this delay. We've now fixed the issues and have set a new date for the feature rollout. It'll be September 16th.
In case you want more background information what arbitrary access is or have questions please see d:Wikidata:Arbitrary access.
Hi all,
We are excited to introduce a new Wikimedia Public Policy site. The site includes resources and position statements on access, copyright, censorship, intermediary liability, and privacy. The site explains how good public policy supports the Wikimedia projects, editors, and mission.
Visit the public policy portal: https://policy.wikimedia.org/
Please help translate the statements on Meta Wiki. You can read more on the Wikimedia blog.
Thanks,
Yana and Stephen (Talk) 2 September 2015 18.12 (UTC)
(Sent with the Global message delivery system)
My apologies for posting this message in English. Please help translate it if you can.
Greetings! The Individual Engagement Grants program is accepting proposals until September 29th to fund new tools, community-building processes, and other experimental ideas that enhance the work of Wikimedia volunteers. Whether you need a small or large amount of funds (up to $30,000 USD), Individual Engagement Grants can support you and your team’s project development time in addition to project expenses such as materials, travel, and rental space.
Thanks,
I JethroBT (WMF), Community Resources, Wikimedia Foundation. 4 September 2015 20.52 (UTC)
(Opt-out Instructions) This message was sent by I JethroBT (WMF) (talk) through MediaWiki message delivery.
Hi everyone,
I have previously announced that your wiki will get arbitrary access. This has now happened. What does this mean? Previously you could only use the data in an article from an item on Wikidata that is directly connected to it. This means for example in the article about Berlin you could not get data about Germany. This has now changed and you can use all data from Wikidata in any article you wish. You can do this by using the property parser function or via Lua. For more information, usage and questions please see d:Wikidata:Arbitrary access.
I hope this will help you do great things here and ease your workload.
Hello Wikimedians!
The Wikipedia Library is announcing signups today for free, full-access accounts to published research as part of our Publisher Donation Program. You can sign up for new accounts and research materials from:
Many other partnerships with accounts available are listed on our partners page, including expanded accounts for Elsevier ScienceDirect, British Medical Journal and Dynamed and additional accounts for Project MUSE, DeGruyter, Newspapers.com, Highbeam and HeinOnline. Do better research and help expand the use of high quality references across Wikipedia projects: sign up today!
--The Wikipedia Library Team 19:42, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
(Apologies for using English below, please help translate if you are able.)
There is still one week left to submit Individual Engagement Grant (IEG) proposals before the September 29th deadline. If you have ideas for new tools, community-building processes, and other experimental projects that enhance the work of Wikimedia volunteers, start your proposal today! Please encourage others who have great ideas to apply as well. Support is available if you want help turning your idea into a grant request.
I JethroBT (WMF), Community Resources 22 September 2015 21.01 (UTC)
(My apologies for using English here, please help translate if you are able.)
Last month, we asked for community feedback on a proposal to change the structure of WMF grant programs. Thanks to the 200+ people who participated! A report on what we learned and changed based on this consultation is now available.
Come read about the findings and next steps as WMF’s Community Resources team begins to implement changes based on your feedback. Your questions and comments are welcome on the outcomes discussion page.
With thanks, I JethroBT (WMF) 28 September 2015 16.56 (UTC)
Proposal ini kelihatannya sudah lama mangkrak. Bagaimana kalau dibangkitkan (dan disempurnakan) kembali? Tampaknya ini bisa jadi solusi untuk menarik penyunting baru, karena bisa jadi salah satu cara memberi insentif bagi mereka yang sudah capek-capek menyunting. Salam, SpartacksCompatriot (bicara) 21 September 2015 14.09 (UTC)
(Sorry for writing in English)
When using data from Wikidata on Wikipedia and other sister projects, there is currently a limitation in place that hinders some use cases: data can only be accessed from the corresponding item. So, for example, the Wikipedia article about Berlin can only get data from the Wikidata item about Berlin but not from the item about Germany. This had technical reasons. We are now removing this limitation. It is already done for many projects. Your project is one of the next ones. We will roll out this feature here on August 18.
We invite you to play around with this new feature if you are one of the people who have been waiting for this for a long time. If you have technical issues/questions with this you can come to d:Wikidata:Contact the development team.
A note of caution: Please be careful with how many items you use for a single page. If it is too many pages, loading might get slow. We will have to see how the feature behaves in production to see where we need to tweak and how.
How to use it, once it is enabled:
Cheers Lydia Pintscher MediaWiki message delivery (bicara) 3 Agustus 2015 17.51 (UTC)
My apologies for posting this message in English. Please help translate it if you can.
Hello,
The Wikimedia Foundation would like your feedback about how we can reimagine Wikimedia Foundation grants, to better support people and ideas in your Wikimedia project. Ways to participate:
Feedback is welcome in any language.
With thanks,
I JethroBT (WMF), Community Resources, Wikimedia Foundation.
(Opt-out Instructions) This message was sent by I JethroBT (WMF) through MediaWiki message delivery. 19 Agustus 2015 00.41 (UTC)
Salam kepada pengurus Wikipedia Indonesia Saya menulis di wikipedia berjudul "Wawancara Kerja" pada 10 juli 15 pada tulisan tersebut saya membuat 7 sumber, 3 diantaranya pranala luar, satu diantaranya blogspot, sewaktu di approve saya pranala blogspot di hapus, saya ingin bertanya alasan kenapa dihapus??
beri saya alasan yang kongkrit, saya tidak melakukan SPAMMing, karena itu merupakan sumber utama dari tulisan tersebut. apa karena akun blogspot lantas di hapus?
apa admin tidak mencoba mengecek dulu? terus andai memang di anggap spam, apa batasan spam disini? saya tidak melakukan itu berulang-ulang, saya tidak cuma menambahkan url pada dead link,.
saya sering melihat komentar admin di pembicaraan, usahakan memasukan sumber pranala luar yang valid, ok, usahakan sumber setidaknya media nasional, haaa? seandainya sumber saya dari detik.com atau liputan 6 atau kompas.com, mungkin tidak di hapus? apa kalian pikir info dari situs media nasional tadi pasti berbobot?? bahkan terkadang ga ada isinya sama sekali.
klo memang alasannya krn pranala blogspot, gimana kalau kita bersihkan semua pranala-pranala yang berasal dari blog2 biasa, saya bisa tunjukan banyak sekali klo admin butuh bantuan, termasuk .com .net yang tidak media nasional kita hapus juga.
sudahlah, ga perlu gitu banget, wikipedia besar dari banyak kontribusi sejak bertahun-tahun, selama masih relevan kenapa tidak dimasukan, bukan blog jualan juga, semua berisi info, tujuan utama wikipedia jg sebagai ensiklopedia, saling lengkap melengkapi, jujur kita juga tidak mendukung adanya spamming, karena itu menyebalkan, tapi tolong jangan asal hapus pranala, klo memang tidak bisa jika bukan situs resmi, gimana kalau usulan saya membersihkan semua pranala yang bukan resmi di semua artikel Wiki, baik blogspot, wordpress, .com .net tolong beri jawaban secepatnya
Nama: Ricardo Simbolon email:ricardosimbolon17@gmail.com
ricardo_simbolon@ymail.com
Seobejo (bicara) 10 Juli 2015 12.09 (UTC)
Saya melihat ada perang suntingan pada halaman 26 Oktober 1988, apa penyebab Little Caprice tidak bisa masuk ke daftar? Saya lihat ia tidak menyalahi en:Wikipedia:Days of the year bab Birth and Death. Ia sendiri juga subjek di artikel kan ya? Justru tidak memasukannya ke dalam daftar menjadikannya artikel yatim dan hal itu tidak diinginkan di Wikipedia.
Saya tahu Little Caprice, dia sudah mendunia dan menjadi favorit saya. Tapi jika ia tidak layak masuk ke kalender hanya karena alasan yang subjektif, maka sangat mengecewakan sekali; saya memilih menghapus ID ini dan mundur dari Wikipedia. Dina Oktavia (bicara) 12 Juli 2015 12.16 (UTC)
siapa sih si little caprice itu mbak Dina?– komentar tanpa tanda tangan oleh Hen58dra (b • k).
There is a proposal at the Commons Village Pump requesting feedback about the thumbnails of static GIF images: It states that static GIF files should have their thumbnails created in PNG. The advantages of PNG over GIF would be visible especially with GIF images using an alpha channel. (compare the thumbnails on the side)
This change would affect all wikis, so if you support/oppose or want to give general feedback/concerns, please post them to the proposal page. Thank you. --McZusatz (talk) & MediaWiki message delivery (bicara) 24 Juli 2015 05.07 (UTC)
Hi,
The Community Engagement department at the Wikimedia Foundation has launched a new learning campaign. The WMF wants to record community impressions about what makes a healthy online community.
Share your views and/or create a drawing and take a chance to win a Wikimania 2016 scholarship!
Join the WMF as we begin a conversation about Community Health. Contribute a drawing or answer the questions on the campaign's page.
The world is changing. The way we relate to knowledge is transforming. As the next billion people come online, the Wikimedia movement is working to bring more users on the wiki projects. The way we interact and collaborate online are key to building sustainable projects. How accessible are Wikimedia projects to newcomers today? Are we helping each other learn?
Share your views on this matter that affects us all!
We invite everyone to take part in this learning campaign. Wikimedia Foundation will distribute one Wikimania Scholarship 2016 among those participants who are eligible.
Happy editing!
MediaWiki message delivery (bicara) 31 Juli 2015 23.42 (UTC)
Sorry for English, I hope someone translates this.
Pywikibot (then "Pywikipediabot") was started back in 2002. In 2007 a new branch (formerly known as "rewrite", now called "core") was started from scratch using the MediaWiki API. The developers of Pywikibot have decided to stop supporting the compat version of Pywikibot due to bad performance and architectural errors that make it hard to update, compared to core. If you are using pywikibot compat it is likely your code will break due to upcoming MediaWiki API changes (e.g. T101524). It is highly recommended you migrate to the core framework. There is a migration guide, and please contact us if you have any problem.
There is an upcoming MediaWiki API breaking change that compat will not be updated for. If your bot's name is in this list, your bot will most likely break.
Thank you,
The Pywikibot development team, 19:30, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
Pas saya baru ngecek halaman gambar pilihan (GP) saya menemukan lagi ada GP yang dihapus di Commons pada slot 60 2015. Trus harus begimana nih, bikin pengusulan istimewa lagi atau diganti aja sama GP saingannya (Berkas:Wroclaw-Most Grunwaldzki.jpg) ? Sekalian saya mau minta agar pranala Wikipedia:Daftar pilihan/Usulan mbok ya dicantumin lagi di Templat:Daftar diskusi donk soalnya sudah ada pengusulan baru lagi itu. Lagian kalo cuman sempet kagak keurus, kenapa pas kemaren-kemaren Kenrick kagak aktif & pengusulan GPnya berantakan kagak dicabut juga tuh pranala halaman pengusulan GP di templat tersebut. --Erik Fastman (bicara) 6 Juni 2015 04.53 (UTC)
Rekan-rekan, saya sudah buat proposal baru WP:ARTIS, sebenarnya sudah terpikir lama, dan sudah sangat kita butuhkan, namun tertunda hingga saat ini. Silakan dikomentari/dilengkapi. ꦱꦭꦩ꧀ ‑Bennylin 「rapat」 8 Juni 2015 - 23:37 WIB
Selamat siang semuanya, saya ingin berbagi pengalaman seputar masalah berkas di Wikipedia. Saya dan Calvin Wisanto telah memberi peringatan bahwa berkas yang diunggah ke Wikipedia harus berlisensi, namun setelah peringatan itu dijatuhkan, pengguna tersebut selalu mengunggah berkas tanpa lisensi, apalagi itu karya orang lain. Selain saya jelaskan prosedur menambahkan lisensinya, dia seperti tidak mau mengindahkan peringatan tersebut. Apa yang harus saya lakukan untuk itu ya?
Terima kasih. Alqhaderi AliffianikoBicara 9 Juni 2015 07.36 (UTC)
Hello Wikimedians!
Today The Wikipedia Library announces signups for more free, full-access accounts to published research as part of our Publisher Donation Program. You can sign up for new accounts and research materials from:
New French-Language Branch!
Many other partnerships with accounts available are listed on our partners page, including an expansion of accounts for Royal Society journals and remaining accounts on Project MUSE, JSTOR, DeGruyter, Highbeam Newspapers.com and British Newspaper Archive. If you have suggestions for journals or databases we should seek access to make a request! Do better research and help expand the use of high quality references across Wikipedia projects: sign up today!
--The Wikipedia Library Team 22:08, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
Apologies for writing in English.
Hi everyone.
Over the last few years, the Wikimedia Foundation has been working towards enabling HTTPS by default for all users, including unregistered ones, for better privacy and security for both readers and editors. This has taken a long time, as there were different aspects to take into account. Our servers haven't been ready to handle it. The Wikimedia Foundation has had to balance sometimes conflicting goals.
Forced HTTPS has just been implemented on all Wikimedia projects. Some of you might already be aware of this, as a few Wikipedia language versions were converted to HTTPS last week and the then affected communities were notified.
Most of Wikimedia editors shouldn't be affected at all. If you edit as registered user, you've probably already had to log in through HTTPS. We'll keep an eye on this to make sure everything is working as it should. Do get in touch with us if you have any problems after this change or contact me if you have any other questions.
19 Juni 2015 22.00 (UTC)
This is a message from the 2015 Wikimedia Foundation Elections Committee. Translations are available.
Voting has begun for eligible voters in the 2015 elections for the Funds Dissemination Committee (FDC) and FDC Ombudsperson. Questions and discussion with the candidates for the Funds Dissemination Committee (FDC) and FDC Ombudsperson will continue during the voting. Nominations for the Board of Trustees will be accepted until 23:59 UTC May 5.
The Funds Dissemination Committee (FDC) makes recommendations about how to allocate Wikimedia movement funds to eligible entities. There are five positions on the committee being filled.
The FDC Ombudsperson receives complaints and feedback about the FDC process, investigates complaints at the request of the Board of Trustees, and summarizes the investigations and feedback for the Board of Trustees on an annual basis. One position is being filled.
The voting phase lasts from 00:00 UTC May 3 to 23:59 UTC May 10. Click here to vote. Questions and discussion with the candidates will continue during that time. Click here to ask the FDC candidates a question. Click here to ask the FDC Ombudsperson candidates a question. More information on the candidates and the elections can be found on the 2015 FDC election page, the 2015 FDC Ombudsperson election page, and the 2015 Board election page on Meta-Wiki.
On behalf of the Elections Committee,
-Gregory Varnum (User:Varnent)
Volunteer Coordinator, 2015 Wikimedia Foundation Elections Committee
Posted by the MediaWiki message delivery 03:45, 4 May 2015 (UTC) • Translate • Get help
Apologies for writing in English, please help translate this into your local language. Hello Wikimedians!
Today The Wikipedia Library announces signups for more free, full-access accounts to published research as part of our Publisher Donation Program. You can sign up for new accounts and research materials from:
Many other partnerships with accounts available are listed on our partners page, including Project MUSE, JSTOR, DeGruyter, Newspapers.com and British Newspaper Archive. Do better research and help expand the use of high quality references across Wikipedia projects: sign up today!
--The Wikipedia Library Team 4 Mei 2015 22.12 (UTC)
This is a message from the 2015 Wikimedia Foundation Elections Committee. Translations are available.
Voting has begun for eligible voters in the 2015 elections for the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees. Questions and discussion with the candidates for the Board will continue during the voting.
The Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees is the ultimate governing authority of the Wikimedia Foundation, a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization registered in the United States. The Wikimedia Foundation manages many diverse projects such as Wikipedia and Commons.
The voting phase lasts from 00:00 UTC May 17 to 23:59 UTC May 31. Click here to vote. More information on the candidates and the elections can be found on the 2015 Board election page on Meta-Wiki.
On behalf of the Elections Committee,
-Gregory Varnum (User:Varnent)
Volunteer Coordinator, 2015 Wikimedia Foundation Elections Committee
Posted by the MediaWiki message delivery 17:20, 17 May 2015 (UTC) • Translate • Get help
Hello, I made a proposal on Meta to change the rules for the steward confirmations. Currently consensus to remove is required for a steward to lose his status, however I think it's fairer to the community if every steward needed the consensus to keep. As this is an issue that affects all WMF wikis, I'm sending this notification to let people know & be able to participate. Best regards, --MF-W 10 April 2015 16.12 (UTC)
This is a message from the 2015 Wikimedia Foundation Elections Committee. Translations are available.
Greetings,
I am pleased to announce that nominations are now being accepted for the 2015 Wikimedia Foundation Elections. This year the Board and the FDC Staff are looking for a diverse set of candidates from regions and projects that are traditionally under-represented on the board and in the movement as well as candidates with experience in technology, product or finance. To this end they have published letters describing what they think is needed and, recognizing that those who know the community the best are the community themselves, the election committee is accepting nominations for community members you think should run and will reach out to those nominated to provide them with information about the job and the election process.
This year, elections are being held for the following roles:
Board of Trustees
The Board of Trustees is the decision-making body that is ultimately responsible for the long term sustainability of the Foundation, so we value wide input into its selection. There are three positions being filled. More information about this role can be found at the board elections page.
Funds Dissemination Committee (FDC)
The Funds Dissemination Committee (FDC) makes recommendations about how to allocate Wikimedia movement funds to eligible entities. There are five positions being filled. More information about this role can be found at the FDC elections page.
Funds Dissemination Committee (FDC) Ombud
The FDC Ombud receives complaints and feedback about the FDC process, investigates complaints at the request of the Board of Trustees, and summarizes the investigations and feedback for the Board of Trustees on an annual basis. One position is being filled. More information about this role can be found at the FDC Ombudsperson elections page.
The candidacy submission phase lasts from 00:00 UTC April 20 to 23:59 UTC May 5 for the Board and from 00:00 UTCApril 20 to 23:59 UTC April 30 for the FDC and FDC Ombudsperson. This year, we are accepting both self-nominations and nominations of others. More information on this election and the nomination process can be found on the 2015 Wikimedia elections page on Meta-Wiki.
Please feel free to post a note about the election on your project's village pump. Any questions related to the election can be posted on the talk page on Meta, or sent to the election committee's mailing list, board-elections -at- wikimedia.org
On behalf of the Elections Committee,
-Gregory Varnum (User:Varnent)
Coordinator, 2015 Wikimedia Foundation Elections Committee
Posted by the MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of the 2015 Wikimedia Foundation Elections Committee, 05:03, 21 April 2015 (UTC) • Translate • Get help
Hi, this message is to let you know that, on domains like id.m.wikipedia.org, unregistered users cannot edit. At the Wikimedia Forum, where global configuration changes are normally discussed, a few dozens users propose to restore normal editing permissions on all mobile sites. Please read and comment!
Thanks and sorry for writing in English, Nemo 1 Maret 2015 22.32 (UTC)
Apologies for writing in English, please help translate this into your local language. Hello Wikimedians!
The Wikipedia Library is announcing signups today for, free, full-access accounts to published research as part of our Publisher Donation Program. You can sign up for new accounts and research materials from:
Many other partnerships with accounts available are listed on our partners page. Do better research and help expand the use of high quality references across Wikipedia projects: sign up today!
--The Wikipedia Library Team 2 Maret 2015 21.14 (UTC)
Sepertinya templat hari ini dalam sejarah yang muncul di Halanan Utama (kecuali peristiwa terkini) tidak bisa disunting oleh pengguna (kecuali admin) karena masuk dalam Halaman Utama/Perlindungan. Misal, entri bulan ini. Padahal isi bagian ini berubah tiap hari dan kadang-kadang ada informasi yang kurang akurat/outdated. Pada bulan Februari saya menemukan informasi yang kurang tepat atau outdated, dan mesti dibenarkan. Saya tuliskan koreksinya di halaman pembicaraan templat tersebut tapi tidak ada admin yang menanggapi, jadi tidak ada yang bisa membenarkan kesalahan-kesalahan tersebut, padahal muncul di halaman utama.
Jadi usul saya, bagaimana kalau bagian Hari Ini dalam Sejarah tidak usah dilindungi, jadi statusnya Peristiwa Terkini. Kalau masalahnya khawatir vandalisme, sepertinya Peristiwa Terkini tidak ada vandalisme yang signifikan :) Lagipula, dengan adanya "revisi tertunda", suntingan pengguna biasa tidak akan langsung muncul, kecuali kalau sudah ditinjau oleh seorang editor. HaEr48 (bicara) 4 Maret 2015 07.08 (UTC)
This March, we’re organizing an Inspire Campaign to encourage and support new ideas for improving gender diversity on Wikimedia projects. Less than 20% of Wikimedia contributors are women, and many important topics are still missing in our content. We invite all Wikimedians to participate. If you have an idea that could help address this problem, please get involved today! The campaign runs until March 31.
All proposals are welcome - research projects, technical solutions, community organizing and outreach initiatives, or something completely new! Funding is available from the Wikimedia Foundation for projects that need financial support. Constructive, positive feedback on ideas is appreciated, and collaboration is encouraged - your skills and experience may help bring someone else’s project to life. Join us at the Inspire Campaign and help this project better represent the world’s knowledge!
(Sorry for the English - please translate this message!) MediaWiki message delivery (bicara) 4 Maret 2015 20.01 (UTC)
Hi all,apologies for writing in English, please read this page for important information and an update involving SUL finalization, scheduled to take place in one month. Thanks. Keegan (WMF) (talk) 13 Maret 2015 19.45 (UTC)
Dengan semakin bertambahnya pengguna AWB di proyek ini maka sering terjadi suntingan seperti bot yang terlihat di perubahan terbaru.
Sehubungan dengan hal tersebut saya ingin berdiskusi mengenai kemungkinan ditambahkannya hak akses baru, yaitu flooder.
Jika memang hal tersebut memungkinkan maka selanjutnya akan kita bahas mekanismenya, yaitu siapa saja yang berhak mendapatkan hak tersebut, syarat-syaratnya dan oleh siapa.
Saran dan komentar dari teman-teman saya tunggu. Salam sejahtera. Wagino 20100516 (bicara) 2 Februari 2015 03.24 (UTC)
Dalam hal tersebut diatas kebijakan itu setahu saya hanya berlaku di tempat itu (Wikidata), sedangkan di WPID sepertinya belum ada. (maaf, pranala hanya untuk pengurus) Jika memang memungkinkan bagaimana jika kebijakannya langsung kita susun dan dibuat voting komunitas? Wagino 20100516 (bicara) 2 Februari 2015 05.07 (UTC)
Kembali ke topik diskusi, mana pendapat teman-teman yang lainnya? Wagino 20100516 (bicara) 2 Februari 2015 10.49 (UTC)
Ada yang bisa menjelaskan mengapa artikel Travel Fotografi dan PC Plus sesuai di Wikipedia Indonesia namun Wirausaha Muda Mandiri dan Indonesia Times tidak? Bukankah artikel tanpa referensi layak yang menjelaskan keberadaan dan informasi subjek terkait (misal tanggal bangun, pemilik, reputasi, peran dalam masyarakat, dan sebagainya) harus dihapus? Atau ini hanya kebijakan spesial di Wikipedia Indonesia saja? Atau Wikipedia Indonesia menggapai perjanjian dengan Gramedia sehingga artikel Travel Fotografi dan PC Plus serta artikel anak-anaknya yang lain diizinkan? Atau karena artikel rintisan boleh ada meski tanpa referensi layak? Atau hanya ditunggu sampai ada yang menjadikannya layak? Tapi apa syarat untuk "menunggu" tersebut, dan mengapa artikel Indonesia Times tidak memenuhi syarat "tunggu dulu" tersebut? Mungkinkah PC Plus di Indonesia memiliki sejaringan dengan tabloid PC Plus di United Kingdom sehingga layak? Tapi Travel Fotografi? Saya belum lama di Wikipedia Indonesia sehingga belum terbiasa, dan sejauh ini memang Wikipedia Melayu memang melakukan hal yang sama. Mungkin ini kebijakan regional? Saya senang sekali jika ada yang memberikan klarifikasi. Bagi saya, ini penting. Saya tidak ingin membuat artikel baru tanpa kejelasan tentang hal ini, khawatir dihapus mendadak karena sesuatu yang tidak saya ketahui sekalipun dengan referensi (karena artikel Wirausaha Muda Mandiri meski dengan referensi, dinyatakan akan dihapus :D ). Ada banyak artikel perusahaan di China Daratan yang ingin saya buat, terutama yang bergerak di bidang teknologi.
btw, sejak kapan China jadi Tiongkok? Lidah saya tidak nyaman, haha. Xiao Hua Lan (bicara) 19 Februari 2015 01.21 (UTC)
((noref))
saja untuk memancing pengguna lain agar menambahkan referensi, jangan memberikan tag ((hapus))
. Dua majalah tersebut notable di masyarakat, namun artikel tersebut membutuhkan referensi lebih banyak lagi. Salam! -- Bonaditya (bicara) 08.56, 19 Februari 2015 (WIB)
Anda tidak fair jika mempertahankan satu artikel tanpa referensi seperti Travel Fotografi dan anak-anaknya Kompas Gramedia tapi menghapus artikel RAHMAD RIZALDY yang juga tanpa referensi, padahal sudah saya kasih tag noref dan anda mengatakan lebih baik gunakan tag noref meski tidak layak. Ini membuat saya sedih jika tidak ada kejelasan tentang kriteria kelayakan artikel seperti ini. :( Xiao Hua Lan (bicara) 19 Februari 2015 02.09 (UTC)
Omong-omong kepada Xiao Hua Lan, sepertinya Anda belum memahami benar semangat kolaborasi dari Wikipedia. Alih-alih Anda mempertanyakan kelayakan artikel yang sudah jelas notabilitasnya sekelas majalah PC Plus, lantaran hanya karena ketiadaan referensi, mengapa tidak Anda coba berkontribusi dengan menambahkan referensinya agar artikelnya tidak dihapus? Lucunya lagi Anda malah membandingkan artikel tersebut dgn artikel vanitas seperti RAHMAD RIZALDY, ah Anda membuat saya tertawa di hari Imlek ini. Oh iya, selamat Imlek ya. Gong xi fa chai. ‹›
™
Kamis, 19 Februari 2015 - 14:44 wib.
Saya meminta pendapat, dikarenakan Wikipedia:Spam belum menjadi Pedoman ataupun kebijakan dan bisa ditambahkan ke dalam templat ((Kebijakan dan pedoman Wikipedia)) dan pada akhirnya orang sering melanggar dan beriklan di Wikipedia, sebelumnya sudah dianggap sebagai alasan untuk memblokir pengguna yang beriklan di Wikipedia bila berkali kali melakukan Spamming atau beriklan di wikipedia (per Wikipedia:Warung_Kopi_(Kebijakan)/Arsip/Desember_2014#Kebijakan_blokir), tolong berikan pendapat apakah pengguna WBI setuju atau tidak.-AldNonUcallin?♫☎☏♬ 17 Januari 2015 20.14 (UTC)
Sebentar sebelum divote, ada baiknya ditambahkan dulu aturan "Pengguna bisa diblokir jika melakukan lebih dari 2 kali spam dalam 24 jam atau 4 kali spam dalam seminggu (manapun yang tercapai lebih dahulu)." Supaya ada alasan untuk memblokir pelaku spam. Jika tidak, maka percuma dibuat jadi kebijakan, karena yang sekarang konsekuensinya hanya artikel diberi tag spam. Hariadhi - Ngobrol 21 Januari 2015 02.22 (UTC)
Karena adanya usul perubahan berupa syarat dan kriteria blokir terhadap pelaku spamming, bisakah kita buka ulang votenya untuk bagian tersebut saja? Terima kasih Hariadhi - Ngobrol 3 Februari 2015 18.54 (UTC)
Saya rasa regulasi pemilihan pengurus perlu dievaluasi. Seperti dalam penutupan sebuah halaman pemungutan suara, apakah tidak ada kriteria mengenai penutupan tersebut? Juga apakah ada aturan yang membolehkan membukanya kembali? Lalu, ketika seorang pengguna sudah memberikan suara, apalagi sudah terhitung, bolehkah ia mengganti suaranya? Anbu (bicara) 22 Januari 2015 00.05 (UTC)
Di sana hanya tertera ditutup berdasarkan waktu dan jumlah suara, tidak menjelaskan hal spesifik lainnya di luar prosedur pemilihan pengurus. Dan juga tidak menjelaskan aturan yang dapat membuka kembali halaman yang sudah ditutup. Kemudian juga tidak ada penjelasan tentang sistem mengganti suara seperti yang Anda katakan. Jangan samakan bersuara untuk usulan sebuah artikel dengan pemilihan pengurus, karena jelas berbeda perlakuannya. Anbu (bicara) 23 Januari 2015 00.41 (UTC)
Mengapa Anda jadi sewot? Saya kan hanya bertanya, bukan protes. Anda salah paham, sepertinya Anda tidak terbiasa berpikir kritis. Kalau tidak boleh mengemukakan aspirasi, ya sudah, saya cukup menerimanya sebagai pelajaran ke depannya. Anbu (bicara) 23 Januari 2015 01.25 (UTC)
Saya sengaja supaya tulisannya tidak selalu menyempit ke kanan, tidak enak dipandang, yang penting tulisan sebelumnya sudah begitu. Mohon gunakan bahasa yang sederhana kepada saya, dan juga sesuai tata bahasa Indonesia yang baik. Jujur, saya malah bingung bahasa dicampur begitu. Anbu (bicara) 23 Januari 2015 01.44 (UTC)
Ada kata disarankan kan? Coba Anda bayangkan jika percakapan kita ini panjang dan selalu menggunakan ":" hingga berlipat-lipat, mungkin hanya satu kata yang muat, kecuali Anda buka paragraf baru, tapi kalau begitu apa bedanya dengan yang saya lakukan sekarang? Saya sudah bilang bahwa "tidak selalu" menggunakannya, tergantung tulisan di atasnya. Kalau yang di atas tidak menggunakannya, maka saya yang menggunakannya. Kalau Anda menganggap itu sebagai pelanggaran aturan, silakan saja, kalau saya menganggap itu bukan aturan, hanya saran penulisan. Anbu (bicara) 23 Januari 2015 03.57 (UTC)
Haha, mau ikutan main mas Wagino 20100516? Bukan saya yang mulai mas, dan sebenarnya yang saya harapkan itu jawaban atas pertanyaan saya, bukan malah membahas kesalahan saya. Apakah orang yang bersalah atas aturan yang dibuat manusia tidak boleh mengemukakan aspirasi tentang aturan yang dibuat manusia itu sendiri? Toh aturan manusia itu tidak mutlak, hanya aturan dan ketentuan Tuhan yang tidak bisa dibantah. Anbu (bicara) 23 Januari 2015 04.58 (UTC)
Terhadap pernyataan Pengguna:Anbu tanggal 23 Januari 2015 00.41 (UTC) di atas:
dapat saya berikan respons sebagai berikut:
Semoga dapat membuat lebih mudah dipahami. Salam. JohnThorne (Bicara) 23 Januari 2015 05.58 (UTC)
Maksud saya bukan begitu bung, supaya tidak berputar-putar, langsung saja saya beritahu contoh kasusnya. Seperti bung Relly, halaman pemungutan suaranya pernah ditutup sebelum syarat penutupan terpenuhi dengan alasan "canvassing", padahal yang tertera di pedoman penutupan hanya dilakukan jika pemungutan suara telah dilakukan 2 minggu, atau mencapai 60 suara. Dan kemudian halaman pemungutan suaranya dibuka kembali dengan alasan sudah meminta maaf, padahal tidak ada pedoman mengenai pembukaan halaman yang sudah ditutup. Mohon bagian ini jangan dijawab dengan alasan lumrah/rutin terjadi, atau dengan pendapat pribadi, saya mengharapkan benar-benar ada kebijakan mengenai ini. Lalu mengenai usulan saya, tidak diterima juga tidak apa-apa. Saya hanya merasa dalam memberikan suara pada halaman pemungutan suara itu seharusnya berbeda dari menyunting di artikel. Anbu (bicara) 24 Januari 2015 00.18 (UTC)
Awalnya saya menganggap hal yang wajar untuk melakukan penutupan, tapi setelah dibuka kembali, saya ambil sudut berimbang untuk didiskusikan kebijakannya. Ngomong-ngomong, mengapa pembicaraan untuk pembukaan halaman tersebut tidak dilakukan di halaman pembicaraannya, bung Hariadhi? Anbu (bicara) 26 Januari 2015 23.40 (UTC)
Saya malah tidak tahu ada diskusinya di warung kopi, haha.. Baiklah, saya mengajukan beberapa perkara untuk dibuat kebijakan, diantaranya:
Itulah beberapa usulan saya, jika ada kekurangan, mohon ditambahi. Jika ditolak, tidak apa-apa. Salam. Anbu (bicara) 27 Januari 2015 17.42 (UTC)
Saya akan mengomentari yang perkara 1 saja. Saya ingin bertanya, apakah aturan untuk bisa melakukan pemblokiran itu tidak jelas? Saya rasa tidak dapat dianggap mencari kesalahan, karena seharusnya aturan pemblokiran sudah jelas. Jika tidak jelas, berarti selama ini pemblokiran dilakukan sewenang-wenangnya? Anbu (bicara) 28 Januari 2015 00.06 (UTC)
Saya rasa pemblokiran bukan pencegahan, melainkan hukuman. Mungkin masing-masing dari kita berbeda dalam memaknai hukuman, dan saya tidak menyinggung lama pemblokiran dilakukan. Pencegahan itu lebih tepatnya adalah teguran kepada yang bersangkutan. Mengenai calon pengurus yang sebelumnya harus berstatus editor, yang perlu saya tegaskan adalah agar semua proses berjalan sesuai mekanisme, bukan untuk ajang kompetisi dan pendapat pribadi. Tentunya jika punya niat baik untuk berkontribusi lebih, tidak menganggap hal itu sebagai "kerja keras" untuk mendapatkannya. Saya mengusulkan perkara 1 dan 2 dibuat voting, bagaimana? Anbu (bicara) 28 Januari 2015 17.23 (UTC)
Baiklah karena usulan saya tidak ada yang disetujui, maka diskusi ini ditutup. Terima kasih atas perhatiannya, wassalam. Anbu (bicara) 11 Februari 2015 09.19 (UTC)