This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 35 | Archive 36 | Archive 37 | Archive 38 | Archive 39 | Archive 40 | → | Archive 45 |
Hey there. I nominated "European Imperialism" and "European imperialism" for discussion. Then the pages got relisted twice, so the nomination is currently at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 18, where I'm inviting you to improve consensus. George Ho (talk) 07:41, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Ongoing WP:Rfc on an article tagged as of interest to this project. Please comment there, thanks, Johnbod (talk) 02:30, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Ian Smith has been nominated for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 23:44, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
I've added some sources. More are out there. Important literary device. Important list for some of our readers. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 15:25, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Hello, |
There is a noticeboard discussion on the reliability of The Logical Indian (thelogicalindian.com) for the Jai Shri Ram article. If you are interested, please participate at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard § The Logical Indian for Jai Shri Ram. — Newslinger talk 07:45, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Kyle Kulinski, whose current draft article is in userspace, is a New York City radio talk show host who has come to greater prominence on YouTube, where he has 831 thousand subscribers and 689 million views and over 4,000 Patreon supporters. His article was nominated for deletion four times since 2017, with the first three results reaching no consensus, and the most recent resulting in deletion on February 1, 2020.
During the AfD, Kulinski asked Jimmy Wales about securing evidence of notability on Twitter, which greatly raised visibility of the AfD among new editors, and resulted a deletion review closed March 5 endorsing the deletion but reaching no consensus on re-creation. About that time, I worked on the article in draft space, submitting it to AfC twice after adding sources. Unfortunately, a number of new and IP editors copied my effort and re-submitted the draft without any improvements, just arguments against the AfC denial rationale, which resulted in a MfD on the draft closed in favor of keeping it, but the disruption from new editors caused administrators to fully protect the draft and salt the deleted article.
Since these disruptions, a number of new reliable sources have come to light, including a March 3 profile in Jacobin which Jimmy Wales says causes Kulinski to meet the GNG, and a January 9 profile in the Santa Clarita Gazette which also had been overlooked at the AfD, DRV, and MfD discussions and is considered significant, independent, reliable, and secondary by the only editor to evaluate it, along with a number of new stories on The Hill TV referencing Kulinski as a headliner authority and excerpting lengthy clips as part of their WP:RSP-approved source publications which were also overlooked at AfD, RDV, and MfD, such as these from July, September, November, and December 2019, and March 6, and April 10, 2020.
Moreover, a request for objections as to whether Kulinski meets WP:ENTERTAINER over a month ago and an RFC opened and closed today resulted in three endorsements that he meets the WP:ENTERTAINER criteria with no dissent. EllenCT (talk) 22:15, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
Because of the troubled history of the draft, we should obtain clear consensus for notability before asking it to be re-created. Therefore, in light of these new and overlooked sources, should Kyle Kulinski be considered notable? 22:15, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
((rfc))
tag to the next timestamp) is far too long for Legobot (talk · contribs) to handle, and so it is not being shown correctly at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Media, the arts, and architecture. The RfC will also not be publicised through WP:FRS until a shorter statement is provided. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 17:12, 13 April 2020 (UTC)At the moment, No party affiliation is a redirect to Independent voter while No Party Affiliation is a redirect to Independent politician. I think both should have the same target. Which one will need to change? Other relevant pages include the article Nonpartisanism and the dab page Unaffiliated. – Uanfala (talk) 01:46, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
There is a RfC taking place at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Elections and Referendums concerning elections infoboxes and the inclusion of second place finishers. It may concern or overlap with this project.--Darryl Kerrigan (talk) 21:11, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
Hello all! I've finished updating the article on the History of democracy in Mexico per my university assignment. If you're free, please head over to check out the re-organization, and the new content under various sections. I've left started off some topics for others to expand on, so feel free to do that or leave any comments on the talk page. Cheers! Claudia Paine22 (talk) 18:40, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
Category:British and Irish political parties has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. You are encouraged to join the discussion on the Categories for discussion page. Place Clichy (talk) 15:11, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
Joe Biden, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. AIRcorn (talk) 23:39, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
Given that we have a bit of a problem with smaller cities getting unmaintained, short mayoral election articles (as illustrated in this AfD), I propose that they be massively consolidated on a state-by-state basis. For cities that fail to meet the principal city criteria set by the U.S. Census Bureau (generally, being listed first in their MSA or CSA name) and are not reasonably important on their own (e.g. by being a major city in a separate state from the principal city), the mayoral elections should be merged into a statewide list article created for each year's local elections. There are already pages like this (2016 Washington elections, 2000 California elections) where the mayoral elections can be easily added. SounderBruce 04:21, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
I have nominated Robert Garran for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:35, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Hello WikiProject Politics. Is there anyone with knowledge of political theories who could help me reviewing this draft article please? The subject also has with servings of mathematics and philosophy perhaps.
The draft's editor has published a book called Mathematical theory of democracy so I am a bit hesitant to judge whether the topic is notable and the article is in a NPOV state. Regarding notability, author advises that the 3 best sources are #12 (Lang), 14 (Tangian) and 16 ("Turning a political education instrument..."). Thanks, 1292simon (talk) 09:44, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
This RfC may be of interest to the members of this project. Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:12, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
Myself & @Butwhatdoiknow: are having a dispute over how the 2020 party primaries should be named (see for example 2020 Hawaii Democratic primary article). Should they follow the current version 2020 State Democratic or Republican primary or instead 2020 state Democratic or Republican presidential primary? GoodDay (talk) 22:49, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
I recently made the article 1960 Cypriot by-elections and the draft was accepted with a C-Class rating. I am trying to expand the article and am interested in knowing how it could reach B-Class i.e what criteria there are and what changes need to be made. KnolGua (talk) 20:42, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback would be appreciated at this split proposal at Philippe Pétain. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 02:52, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
Just in case there are folks here who might be interested in reviewing drafts awaiting article status that are particular to this WikiProject. MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:24, 27 May 2020 (UTC)