This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Political parties and politicians in Canada and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 365 days |
Canada: Politics Project‑class | ||||||||||
|
Politics Project‑class | |||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
This is a notice to let you know about Article alerts, a fully-automated subscription-based news delivery system designed to notify WikiProjects and Taskforces when articles are entering Articles for deletion, Requests for comment, Peer review and other workflows (full list). The reports are updated on a daily basis, and provide brief summaries of what happened, with relevant links to discussion or results when possible. A certain degree of customization is available; WikiProjects and Taskforces can choose which workflows to include, have individual reports generated for each workflow, have deletion discussion transcluded on the reports, and so on. An example of a customized report can be found here.
If you are already subscribed to Article Alerts, it is now easier to report bugs and request new features. We are also in the process of implementing a "news system", which would let projects know about ongoing discussions on a wikipedia-wide level, and other things of interest. The developers also note that some subscribing WikiProjects and Taskforces use the display=none
parameter, but forget to give a link to their alert page. Your alert page should be located at "Wikipedia:PROJECT-OR-TASKFORCE-HOMEPAGE/Article alerts". Questions and feedback should be left at Wikipedia talk:Article alerts.
Message sent by User:Addbot to all active wiki projects per request, Comments on the message and bot are welcome here.
Thanks. — Headbomb {ταλκκοντριβς – WP Physics} 09:34, 15 March, 2009 (UTC)
I have nominated Accurate News and Information Act for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Z1720 (talk) 14:55, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
Quality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a |class=
parameter to ((WikiProject banner shell)), which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.
No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to ((WikiProject banner shell)), and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.
However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass ((WPBannerMeta)) a new |QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom
parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 20:49, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Content assessment#Proposal: Reclassification of Current & Future-Classes as time parameter, which is within the scope of this WikiProject. This WikiProject received this message because it currently uses "Current" and/or "Future" class(es). There is a proposal to split these two article "classes" into a new parameter "time", in order to standardise article-rating across Wikipedia (per RfC), while also allowing simultaneous usage of quality criteria and time for interest projects. Thanks! —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 06:53, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
The following MLA/MPPs are missing articles: 3rd Parliament of Ontario (1875-1879)
4th Parliament of Ontario (1879-1883)
5th Parliament of Ontario (1883-1886)
6th Parliament of Ontario (1886-1890)
7th Parliament of Ontario (1890-1894)
8th Parliament of Ontario (1894-1898)
9th Parliament of Ontario (1898-1902)
10th Parliament of Ontario (1902-1904)
11th Parliament of Ontario (1905-1908)
12th Parliament of Ontario (1908-1911)
13th Parliament of Ontario (1911-1914)
14th Parliament of Ontario (1914-1919)
15th Parliament of Ontario (1919-1923)
16th Parliament of Ontario (1923-1926)
17th Parliament of Ontario (1926-1929)
18th Parliament of Ontario (1929-1934)
Wellington Bay (talk) 03:21, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Good day. I'm not familiar with Canadian politics, so I would like some input on whether being a Parliamentary Assistant to a minister in the Legislative Assembly of Ontario is considered significant enough to warrant a mention in the infobox and the article body. I was working on the Sam Oosterhoff article and it appears that he has been Parliamentary Assistant on three different occasions (per [1]: Parliamentary Assistant to the Minister of Education, Parliamentary Assistant to the Minister of Red Tape Reduction, Parliamentary Assistant to the Minister of Tourism, Culture and Sport). Including them all might bloat the infobox a bit, but wouldn't be totally unmanageable. Liu1126 (talk) 16:55, 11 June 2024 (UTC)