Moved per Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2007/Vote by uninvolved user (in turn derived from consensus on election talk pages): "Users are requested to keep additional comments short, if they need to be made at all. Extended comments should made at each candidate's vote talk page".

oppose I hope Mercury will forgive me my comments and take them in the spirit in which they are meant. It's not just the durova thing, this editor doesn't think things through before he impliments the will of those of which he is a fan- unless he does think things through but doesn't mind. Something was oversighted while he and I were editing (not an edit of mine, but meant the bit I was replying to had gone.) He either didn't bother to find this out or didn't care, and reverted me. I explained what I thought had happened but he didn't bother to apologise (erm...might sound a bit familiar.). I don't mind about this personally now and don't need to discuss it further with him, but don't think it's a good sign that he would be courteous and friendly to those who are unfortunate enough to face the stress of having to face or be a party to an ArbCom.(forgive me everyone if this is long.)Merkinsmum 01:11, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just a note. I don't really recall actually supporting the block other than my comment that I did not believe her request to refer to AC was unreasonable. My concerns were mostly with the behavior during the discussions. Mercury 03:01, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]