This page is currently inactive and is retained for historical reference. Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose has become unclear. To revive discussion, seek broader input via a forum such as the village pump. |
The peer review department of the rugby league WikiProject. Requests for article reviews are encouraged in order to supply editors with feedback, and can be made by following the instructions below.
WikiProject peer reviews
This inactive or historical peer review page has had its instructions updated for posterity's sake. That's because there is now a Wikipedia Peer Review that peer reviews can be listed at, and the old instructions were out of date and may cause problems (or disappointment as not many people may see your review). If this page ever becomes active again, see here for a way to keep reviews up to date.
To change how your project's peer reviews are managed, see here.
Here is a list of people who have expressed an interest in reviewing rugby league articles: