- Previous nomination here.
Renominating for Periklis*; no comment on its quality. Kirill Lokshin 11:20, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Support for A class status although I found the article to contain some bias and POV for the Allied/Greek side with words like "brave" used in uncited passages to refer to the Greek forces. However, the article is well-cited and fairly easy to understand and follow. Cla68 05:18, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Kyriakos 07:40, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Support As per everybody else. Though each indiv section is rather small, and that tends to bug me, this article seems pretty thorough overall, and has lots of pics and citations and all the other goodies that I love to see in an article. LordAmeth 07:55, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Support oldwindybear Two things I would like to see improved though, there are a few weasel words, "brave," etc. And the sections could be a bigger. However it is well cited, and well written. So I will support.
- Support Medains Though I'm concerned about a wider issue that this article butts up next to... There's a link to the Battle of Leros, which provides a little idea of what happened later - but there's very little anywhere on the liberation and aftermath (Germany withdrew from Greece in 1944 AFAIK). Even the Axis_Occupation_of_Greece_during_WWII article has nothing... :(
- Support of course.--Yannismarou 19:13, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The review was closed at this point. Kirill Lokshin 22:35, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Support, though I've been involved in editing it and might be 'too close' to it. User:Buckshot06
- Support Good article.UberCryxic 17:54, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]