Help desk | ||
---|---|---|
< October 11 | << Sep | October | Nov >> | October 13 > |
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
2401:4900:1C09:FA93:7D75:174D:C892:1A96 (talk) 08:30, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
I want to know why the article was striked down for having no reliable sources. I thought Bloomberg was a reputable organization, and I also think Techcrunch is decently reputable. I do understand about the other two sources not being as reputable, but I thought the Bloomberg and TechCrunch sources covered the basic factual information. RPI2026F1 (talk) 13:52, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
I have been working on a new entry, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:James_T._Andrews I think I have followed the guidance I have been getting however, I am wondering if anyone can look it over before I submit it again? As I understand it, the article in question meets three of the criteria outlined for notability for academics. As I read the guidelines for notability for academics, I see at three areas that would qualify for inclusion. These are points 1, 3, and 5 listed on the notability page for academics. "1. The person's research has had a significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources." The submission lists several examples of other important scholars commenting on the impact of his books. "3. The person has been an elected member of a highly selective and prestigious scholarly society or association (e.g., a National Academy of Sciences or the Royal Society)" He is a member of the Russian Academy of Arts and Sciences. "5. The person has held a named chair appointment or distinguished professor appointment at a major institution of higher education and research, or an equivalent position in countries where named chairs are uncommon." He is a "University Professor" which is a type of distinguished professor. Any advice or just another person to look the article over is appreciated.
Rushistoriia (talk) 17:40, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
I am requesting a re-review because I think that One Knoxville SC is notable enough for an article. The league they are in currently (USL League Two) has Wikipedia articles for majority of their teams. 95 of the leagues 115 teams have a Wikipedia article, which is 82.6%.
One Knoxville SC in the latest season:
- Won the South Central Division - Hosted three rounds of the playoffs - Got to the Southern Conference Finals
The team was one of two teams that made the playoffs, that also didn't have a Wikipedia article. The only other team was NONA FC.
Looking at the team's division (Deep South Division), the average amount of reference regarding each team was 6.44. This draft has 14 references. All references except one (the team's website) are independent, reliable, and secondary.
Slywriter wrote a comment saying that it will become notable once the season starts. One season has passed since that comment was made Dege31 also said it was too soon before the season started. RJMcBug (talk) 17:43, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
What problem caused my article to be decline?
Can any experienced editor help me please?
Prince Tuhin13 (talk) 19:27, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
I created a biography of Alexandre Lessertisseur via wikipedia and it was rejected. The English version is a translation of the French one that I also modified. What is the problem and what can I do to publish the article?
Krystofia (talk) 22:12, 12 October 2022 (UTC)