- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 October 10. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 19:08, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Basnahira North current squad
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:08, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Used in a single article Basnahira North cricket team. Subst and delete. ಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ (talk) 16:22, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Basnahira South current squad
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:08, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Used in a single article Basnahira South cricket team. Subst and delete. ಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ (talk) 16:21, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Kandy Crusaders current squad
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:08, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Used in a single article Kandy Crusaders. Subst and delete. ಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ (talk) 16:18, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Kurunegala Warriors current squad
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:07, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Used in a single article Kurunegala Warriors. Subst and delete. ಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ (talk) 16:16, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Colombo Commandos current squad
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:07, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Used in a single article Colombo Commandos. Subst and delete. ಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ (talk) 16:15, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Galle Guardians current squad
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:07, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Used in a single article Galle Guardians. Subst into article and delete. ಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ (talk) 15:23, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Hambantota Troopers current squad
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:07, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Used in a single article Hambantota Troopers. Subst into article and delete. ಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ (talk) 13:16, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:2TeamBracket-MLB
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:58, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
All fail MOS:COLOR. Replace with the standard ((2TeamBracket)), ((4TeamBracket)), ((8TeamBracket)), ((10TeamBracket)), and ((16TeamBracket)) respectively. –Aidan721 (talk) 04:20, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:09, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. – Pbrks (t • c) 15:22, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Support delete Per Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Baseball/Archive 48#Accessibility issues with MLB brackets by Pbrks and discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Baseball#Template:12TeamBracket-MLB, this explains that background colors on a multi-team playoff bracket (red representing American League teams on upper bracket and blue representing National League teams on lower bracket) comes to accessibility issues and are questionable when I tried to make a 12-team playoff bracket with background colors from 16TeamBracket-MLB template on my sandbox page, and I don't know where to remove unnecessary lines between the first and second columns upon omission of unneeded boxes from the 16-team playoff bracket on the first column. In my opinion, I agree with both Aidan721 and Pbrks that multi-team bracket templates ending with -MLB containing background colors on a playoff bracket couldn't agree with MOS:COLOR, so I would support this deletion of multi-team brackets ending with -MLB. These templates ending with -MLB were prominently featured in every postseason article on the "Playoff bracket" section on Wikipedia with background colors. --Allen (talk / ctrb) 16:59, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 19:07, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Propose merging Template:Sonic the Hedgehog characters with Template:Sonic the Hedgehog.
Template:Sonic the Hedgehog characters is very small. It can rather easily fit into Template:Sonic the Hedgehog with little issue. The split was fairly recent as well. (Oinkers42) (talk) 04:10, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep and suggest speedy close. Seven links are more than sufficient for a navbox. This was also split as a result of Template talk:Sonic the Hedgehog#Freedom Planet's inclusion, where Sergecross73 and I (who maintain the Sonic template) decided splitting was warranted because of how bloated the template was becoming. JOEBRO64 12:12, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- I do think both the unofficial Sonic media and the Sonic mass media template splits were warranted, but I am unsure of this particular split. (Oinkers42) (talk) 16:38, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - We're trying to make the main template less overwhelming large. I believe the threshold for a template is 5 links, so it passes the bar there too. Sergecross73 msg me 12:37, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - surely, a merge can't be much worse than Template:Harry Potter? -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 02:38, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeah, that's awful too...? Sergecross73 msg me 00:23, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge or Keep as is It's a small number of links to move to the main template, but even though the STH navbox is quite large it's reasonable to oppose a move like this. The status quo of leaving as is can't do any harm. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:49, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).