The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete after replacement with ((Infobox settlement)). — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:27, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Infobox Helsinki subdivision (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Replace and delete

City-specific wrapper for ((Infobox settlement)), with limited transclusions, on pretty stable sets of articles. Subst:itution will reduce the maintenance overhead, reduce the cognitive burden for editors, and enable articles to benefit more immediately from improvements to the current parent template.

Very uncommon practice: The only city-specific template outside London. Used for different types of entities [neighborhoods, quarters, but not districts], so the type has to be specified anyway. ((Infobox settlement)) can be used directly.

Note: Despite being named "Infobox settlement" the template is not only used for settlements. Per its documentation, Infobox settlement is "used to produce an Infobox for human settlements (cities, towns, villages, communities) as well as other administrative districts, counties, provinces, et cetera—in fact, any subdivision below the level of a country". That is practice for over a decade, it is used on ~ 500000 articles. 77.13.104.62 (talk) 22:42, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Replace and delete - Seems inconsistent to have city-specific templates just for Helsinki and London. TerraCyprus (talk) 13:53, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:26, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Periodic table (p-block trend) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Delete. Not used in mainspace. No future use in vision: we don't do "trends in p-block" at WT:ELEMENTS nor in periodic table descriptions. DePiep (talk) 19:27, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Thanks for looking into this again. --Gonnym (talk) 19:54, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Also, Template:Periodic table (p-block) is identical except for images and period 7, and can serve the same functions, as no trend is explicitly and uniquely denoted here. ComplexRational (talk) 20:50, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete If the trend intended is the decreasing metallicity, the pix actually obscure what the this template claims to show, which is far better illustrated in ((Periodic table (p-block))) which makes no such claim. YBG (talk) 00:55, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:25, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:NYNH&H color (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:NYNH&H lines (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:NYNH&H stations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Superseded by New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad. All transclusions replaced. I've put the 22 S-line subpages within a collapsed section; they're wholly dependent on the three main templates and should also be deleted. Mackensen (talk) 18:30, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete all per nom. --Gonnym (talk) 19:54, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:24, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Fb Draw (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Fb Lose (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Fb win (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

no longer used or needed now that the various fb templates are using standardised colours provided by the various lua modules. Frietjes (talk) 16:00, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete all per nom. --Gonnym (talk) 19:55, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 09:19, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. GiantSnowman 09:21, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, templates are deprecated. BLAIXX 13:55, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, Yeah delete as the norm as they aren't really used anymore. Matt294069 (talk) 22:44, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 May 5. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:47, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:MoreInfo (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Notsure (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Investigating (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:LEG? (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Question (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:24, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:2015 Southeast Asian Games Vietnam men's basketball team roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and all players are redlinks so not really navigating between anything. Gonnym (talk) 12:54, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• delete. if there were more than one of these, then they could be merged them to create the article referenced in this section. but, it appears this is the only one, and the squad did not medal. Frietjes (talk) 15:14, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nominator....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:11, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).