May 5
Template:Indefblockedip
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Keep one, get rid of the other. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:53, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This template should be deleted for the same reason the standard blocked user template was deleted. Namely, it serves no real purpose. IP addresses get blocked all the time, sometimes indefinitely; there's no need to mark up userpages with it. Rockstonetalk to me! 07:27, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete ((Indefblockedbecause)) as it is basically the same as the one that was just deleted, but keep ((Indefblockedip)) for now as it is very uncommon for IP addresses to be indefed. funplussmart (talk) 00:31, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — JJMC89 (T·C) 20:16, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Indefblockedip at this time. Most of the reasons which apply to the standard blocked user templates don't apply to this one. I mentioned a few things in the previous TfD, including its main purpose which is to contain the category CAT:INDEFIPs. The template and category both exist because this is something which shouldn't happen and needs to be fixed. That's its real purpose - not very efficiently done, but a real purpose nonetheless. The organisation of indef'd IPs is undergoing a bit of change at the moment, where we're about to unblock the majority of them, but I don't think now's the time to remove the category or template. Oh, and subst and delete the Indefblockedbecause template. -- zzuuzz (talk) 22:49, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep indefblockedip. We don't outright prohibit indef blocks on IPs, and in the rare case that one is properly indefinitely blocked, we ought to have a template to demonstrate that this really is one of those rare cases. Nyttend (talk) 23:24, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Adirondack Scenic Railroad s-line templates
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 23:57, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Adirondack Scenic Railroad. All transclusions replaced. Mackensen (talk) 18:31, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Metroway s-line templates
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 23:56, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Metroway. All transclusions replaced. Mackensen (talk) 15:05, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Washington Metro s-line templates
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 23:55, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Washington Metro. All transclusions replaced. Added 12 s-line data modules in the collapsed section; they're dependent on the four main templates and should also be deleted. Mackensen (talk) 14:44, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Sad to see these ones go, but adjacent stations is so much better. –Daybeers (talk) 06:17, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 May 15. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:54, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Military list
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 23:58, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Template is unused, undocumented, has fostered content lint errors, and has no apparent utility in Wikipedia. Anomalocaris (talk) 12:41, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).