The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.

User:South Philly[edit]

Suspected sockpuppeteer

South Philly (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Suspected sockpuppets

English Subtitle (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
Stonewall Revisited (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
Amnesia grrl (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
216.185.29.69 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Report submission by English Subtitle (talk) 19

21, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Stonewall Revisited (talk) 19

26, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Evidence

• I'm turning myself in at the request of some other users. English Subtitle (talk) 19:21, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Me too. I was only trying to have some fun. Stonewall Revisited (talk) 19:26, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

I would like to add this IP: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/216.185.29.69 who is clearly editing on behalf of banned user South Philly, e.g. [1] "I can't log into my account; but I wanted my comments to be heard." betsythedevine (talk) 20:55, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Those were mine. Ban me too if you must. Amnesia grrl (talk) 22:53, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Conclusions

Three are self-admitted socks, = indef. The IP is pretty obvious too, 3 month block. — Rlevse • Talk • 00:37, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]