The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions. Not interested in this complaint, take it to WP:RFCU. Format cases correctly next time, the SSP page looks horrid. Iolakana•T 17:28, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Came around september 6. his second edit was sept 12th, his third was on the 13th it basically seems as if his whole existance was to sign this RFC. I believe him to be a sockpuppet

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Robotam&limit=500&action=history Mykungfu 09:16, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Robotam has made it a pesonal mission to destroy pages created by ninjanubian as can be documented by his actions

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Sigma_Pi_Phi

and

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Alpha_Kappa_Nu

he opens up dispute pages for the sake of wasting everyone times..

he is also reverting pages twice in the past 90 minutes

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alpha_Phi_Alpha&action=history

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/NinjaNubian

Mykungfu 08:07, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RR&oldid=75463808

User:Ccson reported by User:Errabee (Result: warning) Three revert rule violation on

Alpha_Phi_Alpha (edit|talk|links|history|logs). Ccson (talk • contribs • page moves • block user • block log):

Previous version reverted to: difficult to say, several minor additions, wikifying has been done as well. 1st revert: 11 September, 04:30 2nd revert: 11 September, 06:19 3rd revert: 11 September, 12:00 4th revert: 11 September, 15:40 Three revert rule warning diff from before this report was filed here (necessary only for new users) :

not done, only after 4th diff warning was given: [19] However, user seems to know about WP:3RR: 30 August, 05:12 Comments: User:Bearly541 reverted the other two additions/reversions from User:NinjaNubian. Errabee 15:55, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

User:Ccson reported by User:NinjaNubian (Result:) Three revert rule violation on

Alpha Phi Alpha (edit|talk|links|history|logs). Ccson (talk • contribs • page moves • block user • block log):

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RR&oldid=76160415

Previous version reverted to: 02:43, 30 August 2006 1st revert: 04:11, 30 August 2006 2nd revert: 04:11, 30 August 2006 3rd revert: 04:16, 30 August 2006 4th revert: 04:28, 30 August 2006 Time report made: 21:52, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Comments: As can be seen above, this is his second 3rr violation in under two weeks. I want a documentation of Ccson's reversion as well as the on going edit war between users.

These diffs are back in August and even earlier than the above warning? --WinHunter (talk) 07:40, 13 September 2006 (UTC) yes this user has a constant history of 3rr behavior

Response

• This is a retaliatory flame by Mykungfu after being reported.[1] His/Her allegations are disproved by a reading of the links S/he listed above and below. -Robotam 16:04, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ongoing revert war on multiple topics and boards as well as filing for RFC's and AFD's

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alpha_Phi_Alpha&limit=500&action=history

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kappa_Alpha_Psi&action=history

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alpha_Kappa_Nu&action=history

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/NinjaNubian

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Alpha_Kappa_Nu

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sigma_Pi_Phi&oldid=75715627

Bearly541

Bearly541 the co author has also been problematic in that he has posted things such as Ninja Nubian

Please do not accept edits by Ninja nubian. He/she is putting irrelavent facts without discussing them on the discussion page. Bearly541 14:49, 11 September 2006 (UTC) REVERT AT SIGHT. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Kappa_Alpha_Psi&oldid=75102668

reverted edits on kappa alpha psi http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kappa_Alpha_Psi&action=history

over here

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kappa_Alpha_Psi&oldid=75102453

and here

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kappa_Alpha_Psi&oldid=75056898

both on september 11th

over here as well

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kappa_Alpha_Psi&oldid=72767067

on the alpha phi alpha article twice on september 11th

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alpha_Phi_Alpha&action=history

as can be seen here

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alpha_Phi_Alpha&oldid=75056228

and here

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alpha_Phi_Alpha&oldid=75053784

as well as here on another day

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alpha_Phi_Alpha&oldid=72533713

Response

• This is completely ridiculous. I am a user in good standing with over 3000 edits to the English Wikipedia, and User:Mykungfu is acting in very bad faith by drawing me into some edit war in which I'm not even involved, over an article I haven't edited in weeks. I see no evidence above to support this accusation. | Mr. Darcy talk 14:22, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• User Mykungfu is flaming users that have reported him for various violations, by cutting and pasting their reports into ridiculous claims against them. The links that he offers as evidence impugn his own allegations. If it will help stop his misuse of wikipedia, I welcome any administrator investigation. -Robotam 14:51, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]