Report submission by: Glen S (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) 04:27, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

LorenzoPerosi1898 was blocked indefinitely by admin Gwernol at 04:29, October 20, 2006
GiovaneScuola2006s account was formed at 21:01, October 21, 2006 - the following day.

The reason for LorenzoPerosi1898's block was a "dispute" with several editors (myself included) regarding claims LorenzoPerosi1898 was inserting without referencing on the Don Lorenzo Perosi article. The "feud" obviously got so bad in this users eyes that he falsified email accounts in my own and another editors name, claimed we were sending him threats and that we were the same person. To settle it once and for all we agreed to a checkuser which showed Not related. LorenzoPerosi1898 was subsequently blocked indefinitely.

They say the criminal always returns to the scene? GiovaneScuola2006's fourth edit was to the Don Lorenzo Perosi article.

It was also an edit to change back the exact two words that the original dispute was over.

I dont feel I need to continue, however briefly, "they" have both contributed many many times to the exact same articles - most specifically Beniamino Gigli Pope Pius XII Leonardo Ciampa and of course the Perosi article.

Their usernames follow the same format (presumably Italian name followed by four numbers)

Their edit summaries are of the same style, with the same use of UPPER CASE of various words in an identical fashion [1] [2]

Finally

Apparently, they not only know of each other, but have just admitted that coincidentally they even use the same IP!

I just declined the unblock. Honestly, they don't get more obvious than this. It's Leonardo Ci... oh, I mean LorenzoPerosi1898. Antandrus (talk) 05:00, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There can be only one (literally) Glen 04:27, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]