The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.
Suspected sockpuppeteer

Kaiser1877 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Suspected sockpuppets

Piononno (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)


Report submission by

Darkspots 21:40, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence

The violation here is that both have argued on Talk:Fräulein in the same way, backing each other up: [5]

Comments

I agree 100% with the findings listed above. I reviewed all the diffs, and the evidence seems irrefutable.

However, since one of the users has unrelated edits, and they legitimately appear to be newbies (and not a sock of a third, unknown editor), I would recommend against the death penalty. Instead, indef-block Piononno, and temporarily block Kaiser (three days should be enough) and warn him to steer clear of Fraulein or else. Just a suggestion. Shalom Hello 02:55, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would think this might be an innocent case of a new user not knowing the rules. Justg put a warning on the page with a link to sockpuppet rules. Don't bite the newcomers. Basejumper 18:24, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Conclusions

I've chosen to block User:Kaiser1877 indefinitely, as it appears more single-purpose, and view User:Piononno as the puppeteer. I've given him a 48-hour block. MastCell Talk 21:23, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]