The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.

Suspected sockpuppeteer

Ekajati (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Suspected sockpuppets

Chai Walla (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
Baba Louis (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Report submission by

--Pigman^{talk • contribs} 01:58, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence

Ekajati (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is under a two month ban for sockpuppetry. Currently confirmed sockpuppets of Ekajati are Hanuman Das (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), A Ramachandran (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), and Tunnels of Set (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Hanuman Das changed his account name and was previously under the user name Adityanath (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). While still under the Adityanath account, two accounts were found to be sockpuppets of the Adityanath account: Baba Louis (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and Chai Walla (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). See here for findings.

Since Hanuman Das is a sockpuppet of Ekajati, then accounts found to be sockpuppets of Hanuman Das are therefore socks of Ekajati.

As of 1/29/2007, Chai Walla is working on Yogiraj Gurunath Siddhanath [1]. This means Ekajati is using this sock to evade the ban.

However there is also this: [2]. They claim the shared IP was because they were all using the same laptop on a trip together.[3] --Pigman^{talk • contribs} 03:57, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: User:Ekajati is currently participating in the Starwood Arbcom case. Investigation into these allegations is also proceeding there. Some analysis can be found at these links: Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Starwood/Evidence#Evidence_presented_by_Blnguyen Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Starwood/Workshop#Checkuser_results_on_Ekajati Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Starwood/Workshop#Sockpuppetry_by_Ekajati. --Pigman^{talk • contribs} 17:07, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Conclusions

Chai Walla and Baba Louis have both been blocked as sockpuppets, per this checkuser case: Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Adityanath. --Akhilleus (talk) 05:43, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---