Zsfgseg

Zsfgseg (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Report date April 29 2010, 22:43 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets
Evidence submitted by Jéské Couriano

Vandals attacking admins and AN/I; are there sleepers and a blockable IP? —Jeremy (v^_^v Dittobori) 22:43, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Comments by accused parties

See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Checkuser request – code letter: B (Ongoing serious pattern vandalism )
Current status – Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below.    Requested by —Jeremy (v^_^v Dittobori) 22:43, 29 April 2010 (UTC) [reply]

 Clerk endorsed To look for some underlying IP to stop this nonsense. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 01:12, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Too much collateral damage, I fear. --jpgordon::==( o ) 19:34, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.
Report date 01:00, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets
Evidence submitted by NerdyScienceDude

See this talk page thread and this edit. Edit are very similar. ~NerdyScienceDude (✉ message • changes) 01:00, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Comments by accused parties

See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

Obvious socks are obvious. –MuZemike 01:04, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.
23 May 2010
Suspected sockpuppets


Evidence submitted by NerdyScienceDude

Trolling and sending emails with random gibberish. Would recommend a CU sweep to find possible sleepers. ~NerdyScienceDude (✉ • ✐) 17:23, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by accused parties

See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Checkuser request – code letter: E (Community ban/sanction evasion )
Current status – Declined, the reason can be found below.    Requested by ~NerdyScienceDude (✉ • ✐) 17:23, 23 May 2010 (UTC) [reply]

 Clerk declined I'm pretty sure that the only sleeper here is Zsfgseg123456789 (talk · contribs) (as revealed by listusers and this edit), if an admin cares to block then we can call this done and dusted, for now. Thanks, SpitfireTally-ho! 09:38, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

information Administrator note Remaining sock, Zsfgseg123456789 blocked. It looks like we're not tagging Zsfgseg anymore per Zsfgseg12345678 so I'm not tagging these socks unless any other clerk wants to. Elockid (Talk) 11:14, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.
06 June 2010
Suspected sockpuppets
Evidence submitted by NerdyScienceDude

He's back... ~NerdyScienceDude (✉ • ✐) 22:30, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by accused parties

See Defending yourself against claims.

Comments by other users

I just bagged User:Zsfg656456456 as well. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 22:34, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

Apparently all indefed. Amalthea 23:36, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.
08 September 2010
Suspected sockpuppets


Evidence submitted by NerdyScienceDude

Sock is already blocked, but he stated in an email that he has more sock puppets. I wonder if this is true. ~NerdyScienceDude 01:56, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by accused parties   

See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

Already checked, no sleepers. There's not much we can do at this point right now as he abuses over very, very busy ranges. –MuZemike 01:58, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

10 September 2010
Suspected sockpuppets


Evidence submitted by 71.249.64.163

This IP address is used my me, a user the community previously banned. 71.249.64.163 (talk) 22:17, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by accused parties   

See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

Thanks for sharing. Marking for close. TNXMan 22:37, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

07 December 2010
Suspected sockpuppets

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

For a few months this user has been socking to the point of insanity, why not check the above IPs and ranges for sleepers? access_denied (talk) 04:21, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
31 January 2011
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Blocked by Elockid; fits the description. (I also assume that is why he's asking for the collateral damage check.) Any more kobolds hiding in the darkness? —Jeremy (v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.!) 21:52, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
16 November 2012
Suspected sockpuppets

Obvious self-declared sock. CU should be done to root out sleepers. Jasper Deng (talk) 03:48, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

No sleepers. Elockid (Talk) 04:36, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Account tagged, marking for close. Jafeluv (talk) 07:21, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

09 December 2012
Suspected sockpuppets

Based on username and attempted edits which were blocked by the edit filter. Also User:RedZsfgseg was blocked a week ago. Sleeper check requested. Legoktm (talk) 00:17, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

No other accounts found. Elockid (Talk) 00:47, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

22 March 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

Reporting based on their suspicious usernames. The other socks are way stale, but these are obvious enough. GABHello! 19:41, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

08 June 2016

Suspected sockpuppets


See below. Elockid Message me 16:12, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Already  Confirmed and blocked by me. Adding for reference so that things don't go stale. Elockid Message me 16:12, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

10 June 2016 (2nd)

Suspected sockpuppets

My suspects, related to Block me if you hate Pakis, originates from the article Baithakata College. It was created yesterday as pure advertising and deleted. Today, in spite of warnings, Lazukshiplu created it again (with the title Baithakata College, Pirojpur, Barisal) with the same text. Btw, I moved the article to the correct title and "saved" (standardized) it. My suspects are due to the fact that, in the user talk of "Block me if you hate Pakis" it appears that the page was created (and deleted) this night, between the 1st and the 3rd (the current one) creations. Btw, another suspect is due to user's behavior: Lazukshiplu seems interested to spam Facebook pages of "his" articles: Baithakata College (before my cleanup), Mugarjhor High School (before cleanup by OnionRing and, after, me), and Baithakata (a village): this is a normal 1st edit by a newcomer but, while I was checking the page, he did this (and again). So, as Block me if you hate Pakis had promotional purposes, Lazukshiplu also seems to be a spammer. The creation of Baithakata College (by Block me if...) 21 hours after first creation, and 12 hours before the 3rd one (by Lazuk), is really suspect. I'm far from being sure of my suspicion, but I think it's my duty: I'm noobsitting Lazukshiplu's creations from 2 days, and the coincidence of his promotional purposes mixed to this is really strange. It's just to remove any doubt. Regards. --Dэя-Бøяg 20:23, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

information Administrator note Case merge. Elockid Message me 00:14, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

26 September 2017

Suspected sockpuppets

So they claim here and here. Already blocked, but I'd like confirmation. Chris Troutman (talk) 03:21, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

More